Honda Hybrid Spied in the U.S. Desert

by Brian Potter
July 24, 2008 9:00 PM
Filed Under: Honda, Japanese, Spy Photos

Caught in the U.S. southwest, this wrapped-up Honda prototype is a 5-door hatchback hybrid which uses a body almost identical to the FCX Clarity fuel cell vehicle. Honda recently announced this vehicle would be the first of three new hybrid models arriving in early 2009.

Although unnamed at this point, the 5-door hatchback will be made at Honda’s Suzuka factory in Japan. Honda plans to sell 200,000 units per year, of which 100,000 will be allocated to North America.

Including the Civic Hybrid, Honda hopes to reach combined annual global sales of approximately 500,000 units for all four hybrid models.

Source: AUTOMEDIA
share  |   email to a friend  |   print  |   add a comment

Comments

Looks like a Prius.. :P

by wolff | July 24, 2008 9:05 PM
Heh, same thoughts ;D

by Kepe | July 24, 2008 9:15 PM
yeahh i thought nextgen prius...

by BabyMilo | July 25, 2008 10:34 AM
this is not a honda this is a toyota, guys look at the front logo do you anything looked like the honda logo, this is a prius facelift not a hybrid honda

by fr3dy | July 26, 2008 12:59 AM
Hmm, it looks just like the Prius :D

by Kepe | July 24, 2008 9:14 PM
WTF? Prius copy!

Mayybe this is Toyota being geniuses and tricking us

by nadster | July 24, 2008 9:23 PM
+10000 for the guy that said this car looks like a Prius. Now Honda is producing a new car thats gonna be hated all over the internet.

by Tuner_Mad | July 24, 2008 9:39 PM
thanx man!! :P

by wolff | July 24, 2008 10:56 PM
Looks like WCF is not disappointing with its usual quotient of uninformed knee-jerking.

Y'all know why it looks like a Prius? Or, more accurately, why the Prius and new Honda hybrid both look like the Citroen CX, Audi A2, various Alfas and Lancias, and the Honda CRX?

Because the basic shape of all those cars, a kammback five-door hatch, is the most aerodynamically efficient shape that will also accept four doors and reasonable room for cargo. The shape is intended to cut fuel consumption through reduced drag. Any manufacturer making a hybrid that seats four and has minimum drag is, through the laws of aerodynamics, going to have to produce a car of that basic shape. Any other shape tends to increase drag, which is a bad thing.

Calling this a Prius copy is like calling an Airbus a Boeing copy because both are big tubes with engines on the wings. Pretty dumb. Get educated before you start slagging on that which you don't understand.

by Snark21883 | July 24, 2008 9:53 PM
Snark's right on target. Certain shapes work and it's hard to depart from them if the car's to have some semblance of usability. Like Snark, I'd hope its dynamic performance is better than the Prius which is so devoid of feel as to be anaesthetized.

by Gubbins | July 24, 2008 11:14 PM
uhm, the worlds most aerodynamic production vehicle is the 2000ish ford taurus. It is a 4 door with tons of cargo room and doesn't look a thing like this.

by joe_limon | July 24, 2008 11:18 PM
F**k off. If it looks like a Prius, it does. It has nothing to do with aerodynamics. We were talking about they way this vehicle looks like. Ok?

by Kepe | July 24, 2008 11:24 PM
That was for Snark.

by Kepe | July 24, 2008 11:25 PM
Snark's dead right! Certain shapes work. To say that something's a "copy" out of hand is ignorant. Oh, and Monty--there's a good chance that the badge shape is also part of the camouflage too, so that people would think it's a Toyota. I've been in this business for a while and we do that as a matter of course.

by Gubbins | July 24, 2008 11:40 PM
"We were talking about they way this vehicle looks like."

So was I.

"It has nothing to do with aerodynamics."

So why else would they make the vehicle, which is intended to be high-mpg, in a shape that just so happens to have the best aerodynamic properties possible?

by Snark21883 | July 24, 2008 11:53 PM
but it isn't the best aerodynamic shape possible! don't you listen? Its a feakin box with a wedge shaped front.

by Joe_Limon | July 25, 2008 7:10 AM
100% in agreement with Snark ... good to hear from someone with knowledge and understanding instead of a "no brainer" comment ... this is the most efficient shape by far ... clearly this is a much much larger platform than the Prius and looks a lot like a Honda FCX with a disguised rear end ... it would also make economic sense to build volume by creating a hybrid on the same platform as the FCX will be a low volume expensive vehicle.

by daviepops | July 25, 2008 2:42 PM
"but it isn't the best aerodynamic shape possible! don't you listen? Its a feakin box with a wedge shaped front."

Yes. It also has a kammback, the truncated teardrop shape calculated to have the best aerodynamic properties for a space-efficient car. It's quite plainly not a box, as the rear glass slopes down to about 50% of the maximum height of the car - one wonders if we're even looking at the same car, or if you bothered to look at the pictures at all. That wedge-shaped front end that you somehow managed to notice is also designed for maximum

I love how you're lecturing an engineer about aerodynamics. Please continue. I always enjoy dumb opinions expressed with great force. It lets me know who should be ignored.

by Snark21883 | July 25, 2008 6:28 PM
"uhm, the worlds most aerodynamic production vehicle is the 2000ish ford taurus. It is a 4 door with tons of cargo room and doesn't look a thing like this."

Actually, it had a rather decent .30 Cd, which is comparable to most production cars, and much worse than the Insight, Prius, and FCX Clarity, all of which are in the mid-to-low .20's. However, it had a larger frontal area than most modern hybrids, which led to an overall mediocre CdA (Coefficient of drag with frontal area figured in.) This is where the Prius, A2, Insight, and other Kammback cars also rule, as they tend to minimize frontal area and are therefore far more aerodynamically efficient than a larger car with a low coefficient of drag - the measure of which is only part of the aerodynamic efficiency of a car. The Ford Flex has a Cd around 0.3 too, but its high frontal area means it's not as good as a car with a smaller frontal area and the same Cd.

Also, note the effective debate strategy of actually including real facts, instead of random crap you pull out of your ass, in a debate. Consider it sometime.

by Snark21883 | July 25, 2008 6:42 PM
haha don't get me started on your facts. The only real fact that I was able to find was about the 1985/86 taurus having a coefficient of friction of about 0.29 and that was publically released by ford. All the other numbers you might find on the web were originated by a website that felt the need to fill in the number on there specs sheet. other sites copied and now we have several sites displaying the same wrong data. I am sorry, but how after 15 years of improving aerodynamics on a car does it get 0.01 worse then the year it started out? Please, if you want to use numbers cite your sources and make sure they are credible (aka from ford or sae or any other similar body)

by Joe_Limon | July 25, 2008 9:41 PM
this is prius #3

by coopergt | July 24, 2008 10:07 PM
Its going to look like the Honda FCX Clarity Advanced Fuel Cell Vehicle.

by C-KING | July 24, 2008 10:08 PM
I, personally, will be interested in this as a daily driver if it's got decent driving dynamics.

by Snark21883 | July 24, 2008 10:09 PM
Its A Toyota Prius...Look at the grill it has a round part for the toyota badge unlike the slightly square shape for the honda badge

by Monty | July 24, 2008 11:06 PM
actually the front has the jellybean face of a volkswagen and the back has the profile of a prius. In fact the front is also pudgy like a jetta and the back is visually narrow. ALA EV1, but with 4 seats and cargo. Seriously, Honda needs to hire better designers and engineers, not just overworked underpaid number crunchers.

by archytype | July 25, 2008 5:51 AM
Looks a lot like current Prius, but i know next-gen Prius will look a lot better then this, so no worries about Honda copying old models, lol

by mc959 | July 25, 2008 11:32 AM
I also thought it had a VW front end. that grill can be easily recognised.

by Tuner_Mad | July 25, 2008 1:39 PM
i think it is the next gen pri-ass! is the "acura" sign oval? if so then i could be wrong, but honda, as someone mentioned earlier, has a squarish logo

by si1982 | July 26, 2008 1:00 AM
To snark....for such an aerodynamic shape isn't it strange how at 100km/h a BMW 520d is more fuel effiecient than the Prius with its fancy schmancy shape and hybrid drivetrain?

Shows the aerodynamics have less impact than the engine wouldn't you say? Therefore why doesn't Honda design a car that doesn't look like a carbon copy of the Prius?

by Homerlovesbeer | July 26, 2008 3:40 AM
It certainly shows the choice of fuel is more important, yes. Do not doubt how important aerodynamics are to fuel consumption.

by Bremen_Koenigsegg | July 26, 2008 6:32 AM
"Therefore why doesn't Honda design a car that doesn't look like a carbon copy of the Prius?"

Honda designed a car that looks like Insight (which looked like CRX). The difference is, Insight wasn't as big and had only two doors.

Prius follows the same design basics as CRX, Insight (and many other cars), hence the similarities.

by RobertsMx | July 28, 2008 11:38 PM
The problem is not simply the striking resemblance this vehicle has to the Prius. Consider it, how many gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles are there in the world? A dozen, maybe; I can't be bothered to count, seeing as how I despise the lot of them. Why the hell is Honda being so obtuse? They develop a ground-up hybrid vehicle and it ends up sharing the same general shape as the archetypal hybrid, the "green" poster child, the Toyota Prius! What foolishness! How many economy-minded ground-up designed-to-be-hybrid vehicles are there in the world, since we're on the topic? The Honda Insight, the Toyota Prius... and now this. I understand it is a functional shape, but honestly... it is a pathetic attempt.

by Bremen_Koenigsegg | July 26, 2008 6:46 AM
Speaking of which, isn't the Prius due for a new generation next year?

by Bremen_Koenigsegg | July 26, 2008 6:50 AM
It just looks too much like a Prius to be anything else. Out of strange curiosity, googling "California DST 3421", the license plate, results in other Honda prototypes, so there you go.

by panuzzi | July 26, 2008 8:12 AM
This could be one of Honda's hybrid exclusive model. Although styling is quite similar to Prius, the major argument is its cost. Honda is struggling to develop cheaper hybrid of which target cost is less than 10% higher than petrol in the same class. I am pretty sure that this vehicle is the first comer in Honda range that realize this target cost

by hiromichi | July 26, 2008 4:21 PM
This is definitely a Honda even if it looks very similar to the Toyota Prius. Just looking at the face alone, it shares many design cues with the FCX Clarity from the grill design to the continuous headlight treatment that extends all the way close to the wheel wells. The masking attempts to blur the defining lines. The oval emblem shape is a simple yet ingenious attempt to make people think it's a vehicle other than a Honda. Even the door handles resemble the Clarity/Fit/Jazz handles, and not the typical grab handles of Toyota models. So sorry but the insistent "this-is-a-Prius people" here will have to eat their words when the production version is finally unveiled.

by daimlerz | July 26, 2008 4:45 PM
Looks better than the Prius...

http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2008/08/renderings-hondas-hybrid-prius-fighter.html

by Car_Nut | August 3, 2008 2:46 PM

Add Your Comment

Existing Users

Username
Password
remember me on this computer

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment
Subscribe to WorldCarFans Newsletter
Please enter your email in the following box and click subscribe to receive our daily email