Share

German brands get hammered in engine reliability report

 German brands get hammered in engine reliability report
New Mercedes-Benz 3.5 liter V6 engine assembly 07.05.2010

Japanese brands come out on top

UK-based Warranty Direct has gone over their data and released a report that details which companies build the most reliable engines.

According to their warranty claims, Honda builds some of the most durable engines as their failure rate is just 0.29%. Toyota and Mercedes weren't far behind as their failure rates were just 0.58% and 0.84%, respectively. Rounding out the top five were Volvo with 0.90% and Jaguar with 0.98%.

At the other end of the spectrum with the worst manaufacturers, MG Rover took the crown for building lackluster engines with an astounding failure rate of 7.88 percent. Audi and MINI fared slightly better as failure rates were clocked at 3.71% and 2.51%, respectively. Booby prizes were also awarded to Saab (2.49%) and Vauxhall (2.46%) for a less than stellar showing.

While all engines aren't created equal, neither is the cost to repair them. Warranty Direct says an engine failure in a Range Rover Vogue recently set them back £13,000 ($20,640 / €15,515).

Source: Auto Express

Add comment

Comments (54)

 raduq raduq
I'm curious where BMW is in these charts, seeing that you mentioned some of its competition's scores.
+2
January 18, 2013 5:11 pm
 SnakesInMyPants SnakesInMyPants
go ahead BMW/Audi, sell more cars. Mercedes still makes better cars
+6
January 18, 2013 5:18 pm
 afterace2 afterace2
Sadly engine durability doesn't equal a durable car, as electrics tend to be a pain in the ass much more often.
+8
January 18, 2013 5:30 pm
 Bozzor Bozzor
I have to give full respect to the Honda S2000: my friend has just passed on his old one to his daughter as her first car. It's done almost 168,000 km - and the only issues have been a loose parking brake and a split exhaust system. For 2.0 litre sports car putting out 240 hp without any forced induction, that is simply mind blowing.
+5
January 18, 2013 5:37 pm
 Microice Microice
Curious to know how they came up with the percentages and the population stats of their clients. if it's number of engine failures divided by total number of claims per make doesnt it figure that if their clients drive more of a certain type of make then the engine failure rates are likely to be lower. coz i'm thinking how many toyotas vs saabs do they cover and one bad saab can ruin the percentages since they are likely to be lower numbers of saabs than toyotas. just saying %s may not be the best way for this sort of data.
+6
January 18, 2013 6:03 pm
 Microice Microice
And what was the most common claim for each make or overall? Cars are not simple these days, a lot of s**t can go wrong.
+2
January 18, 2013 6:08 pm
 hunker7 hunker7
My .94 Audi has done 415 000 km without any major issues. Test is stupid, as it shows which car owners service their cars properly.
+1
January 18, 2013 6:10 pm
 termigni termigni
wow honda, i thought it was myth! great job!
-2
January 18, 2013 6:16 pm
 Microice Microice
warranty direct provides cover after the original manufactures warranty has run out... just how old are the cars they cover? coz if my toyota warranty is 3 years and my volvo warranty is 5 years by the time i go to these guys in my volvo its older than the toyota... this data is unreliable, so many variables
+4
January 18, 2013 6:33 pm
 Garais877 Garais877
:D only brits can make report like this, lets keep in mind that 80% Hondas in britain are owned by old people who drives only once a week and not more then 5 miles... and also we now how brits look after they cars, some of them even does not now that engine needs oil... P.S. @MachinaeSupremacy absolutly right...
-5
January 18, 2013 9:39 pm
 Garais877 Garais877
Just try google this - Audi A4 Best of All Classes in DEKRA Used Car Report
-3
January 18, 2013 9:44 pm
 vasgko2 vasgko2
Perhaps this percentage is also affected by the treatment a car gets from its owner. In my country mercedes, volvo and jaguars are far more expensive than opel (vauxhall) and so their drivers are more careful not to "hurt" their car. Besides all three brands are almost exclusively driven by older people ;-) Audis and BMWs on the other hand are expensive but they tend to end up in "heavy footed" drivers.
+1
January 19, 2013 3:43 am
 TrevorSpecht TrevorSpecht
I know a work colleague who destroyed an engine because he did not put oil in it. Is that the manufacturers fault?
-1
January 19, 2013 4:24 am
 GRAVE GRAVE
Ok every one here must have a car in the list which has 150k miles but that doesn't mean the whole brand is reliable. You have an 8 years old Aude A6 which done 250k miles yes it did not break down but Audi doesn't only build an A6.
January 19, 2013 4:58 am
 GRAVE GRAVE
Kudos to MB for the third place
+6
January 19, 2013 5:01 am
 CanOzcivelek CanOzcivelek
I own a Honda Civic and I could've never thought that Honda could top these brands by any means. Also I'm a Mercedes fan, so this is good news for me hahah! BMW is a disappointment though.
+1
January 19, 2013 5:43 am
 2nice 2nice
I have Volkswagens for 44 years in my family (my father, brother and me), from Beetle to New Beetle and 6 Golfs, no problems at all ..
+2
January 19, 2013 5:50 am
 docstef75 docstef75
it's interesting that only 1 honda in 344 had engine failure, but how you can compare this to 1 MG in 13 or 1 bmw in 45?. From a scientific and statistic point of view this study has almost two big bias: samples are not homogeneous and results are not standardized. so those numbers PROVES NOTHING
+1
January 19, 2013 6:48 am
 ElioBorrero ElioBorrero
MINI has nothing to fear, BMW is making a new 3 cilinder Engines for them so they stop getting Peugeot Engines for their cars, ones BMW passes the first 24 months of test with the new Engine most of the problem will be sold.
January 19, 2013 9:46 am
 BeEmWe BeEmWe
A British report in which Jaguar & Land Rover are in the top 10!!! Sounds like a joke!
+3
January 19, 2013 10:04 am
view more comments