German brands get hammered in engine reliability report

 German brands get hammered in engine reliability report
New Mercedes-Benz 3.5 liter V6 engine assembly 07.05.2010

Japanese brands come out on top

UK-based Warranty Direct has gone over their data and released a report that details which companies build the most reliable engines.

According to their warranty claims, Honda builds some of the most durable engines as their failure rate is just 0.29%. Toyota and Mercedes weren't far behind as their failure rates were just 0.58% and 0.84%, respectively. Rounding out the top five were Volvo with 0.90% and Jaguar with 0.98%.

At the other end of the spectrum with the worst manaufacturers, MG Rover took the crown for building lackluster engines with an astounding failure rate of 7.88 percent. Audi and MINI fared slightly better as failure rates were clocked at 3.71% and 2.51%, respectively. Booby prizes were also awarded to Saab (2.49%) and Vauxhall (2.46%) for a less than stellar showing.

While all engines aren't created equal, neither is the cost to repair them. Warranty Direct says an engine failure in a Range Rover Vogue recently set them back £13,000 ($20,640 / €15,515).

Source: Auto Express

Add comment

subscribe to comments
comment rules Add comment

Comments (54)

Talk about hot topic! If you are a self-respecting worldcarfan, then you must know something called JD Power Satisfaction Survey! If the car brand you drive isn't at least in the Top 10, chances are you may have ended up with a liability! That's why a year ago, I advised my wife to buy a Honda Civic; she hasn't regretted it ever since! Hence it comes as no surprise why Honda STILL rule the roost! Great surprises from Fiat and Land Rover making Top 10! However, something isn't quite right about the positions of VW and Audi engines on the list. Since this is a British company, an element of bias in the statistics could be at play here! My MKIV Golf has hardly ever let me down except once in 7 years of ownwership! That engine starts first time and it's protecting my family in the current snowy weather conditions.
Jan 19, 2013 9:29 pm
3 0
try google - Audi A3 Takes - Gelber Engel - for Outstanding Quality, A6 is Runner-Up.
Jan 21, 2013 11:16 am
0 0
Lol Audi is second worst! Another reason I would ever buy one. 1.5 percent worse than BMW and 3 percent worse than mercedes.
Jan 19, 2013 6:33 pm
1 3
I don't care cor this tests, because I had a lot of German cars, and the quality is superb.
Jan 19, 2013 3:39 pm
3 2
alright, well done Toyota! and that's why i own one!! :D and as usual VAG and french sucks...
Jan 19, 2013 1:54 pm
1 2
try goolge - The Facts About Oil Changes For Your Car, as i said british don't know any of this :D but still like to see what models were tested, what year, what milage??? looks that's secret...
Jan 19, 2013 11:03 am
1 4
A British report in which Jaguar & Land Rover are in the top 10!!! Sounds like a joke!
Jan 19, 2013 10:04 am
4 2
MINI has nothing to fear, BMW is making a new 3 cilinder Engines for them so they stop getting Peugeot Engines for their cars, ones BMW passes the first 24 months of test with the new Engine most of the problem will be sold.
Jan 19, 2013 9:46 am
2 2
it's interesting that only 1 honda in 344 had engine failure, but how you can compare this to 1 MG in 13 or 1 bmw in 45?. From a scientific and statistic point of view this study has almost two big bias: samples are not homogeneous and results are not standardized. so those numbers PROVES NOTHING
Jan 19, 2013 6:48 am
2 1
Bang on, the only way a study like this could be completed would be using the same sample size for each brand. This means you would have to monitor at least 1000 cars, each from the point they left the assembly line. You cannot select them after that because your selection process might skew your data. Again though 1000 is not a large enough sample, it would be more than 10,000 to get an accurate result. Then you run into a problem where Honda has a very limited engine range in comparison to something like BMW/Merc/VW, so which engines do you choose to monitor? You'd have to put a 2.0L I4 from honda vs a 2.0L I4 naturally aspirated from the competition. The one thing this study leaves out is the most important part of any statistical study, their sigma....
Jan 19, 2013 2:52 pm
4 0
I have Volkswagens for 44 years in my family (my father, brother and me), from Beetle to New Beetle and 6 Golfs, no problems at all ..
Jan 19, 2013 5:50 am
3 2
I own a Honda Civic and I could've never thought that Honda could top these brands by any means. Also I'm a Mercedes fan, so this is good news for me hahah! BMW is a disappointment though.
Jan 19, 2013 5:43 am
3 2
Kudos to MB for the third place
Jan 19, 2013 5:01 am
6 0
Ok every one here must have a car in the list which has 150k miles but that doesn't mean the whole brand is reliable. You have an 8 years old Aude A6 which done 250k miles yes it did not break down but Audi doesn't only build an A6.
Jan 19, 2013 4:58 am
3 2
I know a work colleague who destroyed an engine because he did not put oil in it. Is that the manufacturers fault?
Jan 19, 2013 4:24 am
1 1
Perhaps this percentage is also affected by the treatment a car gets from its owner. In my country mercedes, volvo and jaguars are far more expensive than opel (vauxhall) and so their drivers are more careful not to "hurt" their car. Besides all three brands are almost exclusively driven by older people ;-) Audis and BMWs on the other hand are expensive but they tend to end up in "heavy footed" drivers.
Jan 19, 2013 3:43 am
2 1
Just try google this - Audi A4 Best of All Classes in DEKRA Used Car Report
Jan 18, 2013 9:44 pm
2 5
:D only brits can make report like this, lets keep in mind that 80% Hondas in britain are owned by old people who drives only once a week and not more then 5 miles... and also we now how brits look after they cars, some of them even does not now that engine needs oil... P.S. @MachinaeSupremacy absolutly right...
Jan 18, 2013 9:39 pm
2 7
warranty direct provides cover after the original manufactures warranty has run out... just how old are the cars they cover? coz if my toyota warranty is 3 years and my volvo warranty is 5 years by the time i go to these guys in my volvo its older than the toyota... this data is unreliable, so many variables
Jan 18, 2013 6:33 pm
6 2
wow honda, i thought it was myth! great job!
Jan 18, 2013 6:16 pm
2 4
My .94 Audi has done 415 000 km without any major issues. Test is stupid, as it shows which car owners service their cars properly.
Jan 18, 2013 6:10 pm
7 6
Our family 96 Audi A6 is at 240 000. And still in great shape!
Jan 18, 2013 7:25 pm
2 5
what engine?
Jan 18, 2013 7:46 pm
2 2
2.6 V6 ! with only 150 hp.
Jan 19, 2013 11:53 am
2 0
got exactly the same engine lol.
Jan 19, 2013 6:35 pm
1 0
Nice to know yours keeps going !
Jan 21, 2013 10:42 am
1 0
And what was the most common claim for each make or overall? Cars are not simple these days, a lot of s**t can go wrong.
Jan 18, 2013 6:08 pm
3 1