McLaren gags Hamilton after Sutil's 'coward' slur

 McLaren gags Hamilton after Sutils coward slur
Lewis Hamilton (GBR), McLaren Mercedes - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 19, Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, 13.11.2010 / Copyright: Davenport / xpb

McLaren on Wednesday stopped Lewis Hamilton from responding to former friend Adrian Sutil's "coward" accusation.

Sutil, the 2008 world champion's former F3 teammate, has been Hamilton's closest friend in the paddock throughout their subsequent formula one careers.

But the German slammed his British rival for being "not a man" this week after Hamilton declined to appear as a witness at Sutil's assault trial in Munich.

Despite sitting alongside Sutil in the Shanghai nightclub last April, Hamilton claimed in a written statement to the court he could not remember the details of the alleged assault on Lotus team executive Eric Lux.

"I do not want to be friends with someone like that," Sutil, referring to Hamilton, said after receiving a 18-month suspended jail term and EUR 200,000 fine for grievous bodily harm.

A reporter asked Hamilton about Sutil's anger following the launch on Wednesday of the 2012 McLaren car.

Before the Briton could answer, a McLaren spokesman intervened: "We've been told that Lewis shouldn't really go there because it (the conviction) might go under appeal.

"So can we move on to the next question," he added.

Hamilton told the reporter: "I'll listen to him."

The winner of 17 grands prix had a tumultuous season on and off the track in 2011 but on Wednesday thanked McLaren for granting him a long winter break that left him feeling "fresh" for the new year.

"What I have decided to do this year is just focus on the most important thing and that's racing," said Hamilton.

He also hopes to quickly ease rumours about his expiring McLaren contract.

"I think probably after the first couple of races it's something we will probably want to get out of the way so we can focus on the rest of the year without the team being concerned and without it being something that's just hanging around for us.

"Then you guys won't be having to ask questions about it," he smiled to reporters.

 

Add a Comment

Comments (10)

Subscribe to comments
 PAA PAA
Bad handling. Not taking the stance does not leave you neutral. Cowardly move.
-2
February 2, 2012 2:21 am
 sideskraper sideskraper
Hamilton should speak in front of a court, keeping quiet in front of the media is the right thing to do right now.
+4
February 2, 2012 4:56 am
 Narco Narco
PAA sounds like the type that acts before they think... There is no way I am Narc'ing on a F1 Exec. Anyone dumb enough to take the first swing on a boss deserves what they get, plain and simple. I'm all about friendship, but not to the point where is screws me over. Lewis is a smart man to stay low until this whole thing works itself out. Love, Narco.
+1
February 2, 2012 6:21 am
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Consider Hamilton's position: either testify against a F1 team executive, who likely has a lot of influence in the sport, or testify against his own friend. Obviously he's in a bit of a pickle, and Sutil fails to realize that. Considering how political the sport is, it would behoove Hamilton to keep his stance himself, at least in the eyes of the public.
+2
February 2, 2012 6:08 am
 sideskraper sideskraper
He has nothing to lose by telling the truth.
-1
February 2, 2012 7:20 am
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
In a fictional world, maybe. But in reality, he can lose a lot. He is wise to observe the hierarchy.
February 2, 2012 12:05 pm
 sideskraper sideskraper
No he isn't. It is plainly the wrong thing to do. He was not a party to the conflict, simply a witness. There is no risk to him from testifying in court. Pressure placed on him by his management team to stay away from the hearing to protect his image has been wrong because now in the media he is being painted as someone who only has self interest, is not loyal, does not value friendship, and lacks integrity. Not commenting to the media about the case is however the right thing to do.
-1
February 2, 2012 6:43 pm
 saytamaner saytamaner
Maybe telling the truth would be bad for Adrian, and Lewis is trying to protect his friend by remaining silent.
+1
February 2, 2012 11:37 am
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Another valid theory. Given the setting of the incident, there was likely a lot of alcohol involved. This means broken memory, clouded judgment, etc... Hard to know for sure what really happened.
February 2, 2012 12:10 pm
 mn07 mn07
He left his best friend in the cold. I lost all respect to Lewis. what a load of BS
February 3, 2012 12:07 am