Mahindra & Mahindra wants Saab - report
Turkish company also interested
The Saab saga continues as two potential suitors have emerged during the company's bankruptcy process.
Citing multiple sources, Bloomberg is reporting Mahindra & Mahindra is attempting to meet with court-appointed administrators to buy part or all of the company. In addition, an undisclosed Turkish company is also rumored to be interested.
Any deal would likely take months to complete, but we're sure creditors are interested in recouping as much as possible.
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (20)
Next thing I hear, Broadway's latest and greatest musical hit: The Saab Saga!
January 2, 2012 1:25 pm
ahah, thats a good one. but i hope this brand gets a chance (another one, i know), because it has real potencial, and if GM hadn't f*ck it up over the last decade with them, they would be in a better place right now. And now that they showed what they can do (i love the new Saab 9-5), i think they deserve a respectfull owner.
January 2, 2012 6:30 pm
5 replies
That's easy to say 14358 but Saab would probably be long dead if it wasn't for GM's funding. They were receiving oxygen so they didn't care about bringing out new cars. Oxygen gone, Saab dead. (Saab owner and long fun)
January 2, 2012 8:14 pm
you're an absolute fool if you think GM in any way at all had a poor effect on Saab. GM did nothing but breathe life to the otherwise doomed brand. When Saab failed to produce profit GM said forget it and bailed on them, cutting there losses. Saab borrowed technology, from GM and gave nothing in return. they deserve no owner.
January 3, 2012 12:20 am
@PAA, they didn't bother bringing out new cars? Erm, they actually had a new 9-5 ready to go in 2006, GM put the brakes on it instead opting for a(nother) facelift. Saab also had the 9-3x ready for production in 2006 when GM decided that the epsilon platform wouldn't get AWD, only to backflip in 2009 when the 9-3x was finally launched. You can't blame Saab for it's lack of models. GM had the final say in all of Saabs operations.
@ebarsy I'm afraid that you look to be the fool at the moment. Saab borrowed technology from GM? No Saab designed and developed technology for GM. Remember the GM ECOTEC engines? Most of the design and development work was done by Saab, in fact GM used Saab as one of its main R&D centres. So Saab may have "borrowed" technology from GM but Saab was the one to develop the technology in the first place.
January 3, 2012 2:34 am
Thanks for that, wcfuser14358. I should send that title to Broadway; it might even be a future hit, like Beige Bites Back!
On a more serious note, I actually would be happy if Saab survived. I've always thought their cars, while not perfect (ambitious pricing and suspect durability, for instance), were still cool to see on the rode, and a lot more interesting and cooler-- yes, cooler, in my opinion-- than anything from BMW and (mostly) Audi. The PhoeniX Concept is badass, in my opinion, and I like the new 9-5 (wagon) and 9-4X (even though it's a crossover), and I think the next 9-3, if it gets to exist, would be quite a nice Saab. It's just that I've heard one too many "Saab May Have Found A Future Buyer-- Again!" stories over the past year to be really, truly optimistic about their next last-minute savior.
January 3, 2012 2:24 pm
Thanks for that, wcfuser14358. I should send that title to Broadway; it might even be a future hit, like Beige Bites Back!
On a more serious note, I actually would be happy if Saab survived. I've always thought their cars, while not perfect (ambitious pricing and suspect durability, for instance), were still cool to see on the rode, and a lot more interesting and cooler-- yes, cooler, in my opinion-- than anything from BMW and (mostly) Audi. The PhoeniX Concept is badass, in my opinion, and I like the new 9-5 (wagon) and 9-4X (even though it's a crossover), and I think the next 9-3, if it gets to exist, would be quite a nice Saab. It's just that I've heard one too many "Saab May Have Found A Future Buyer-- Again!" stories over the past year to be really, truly optimistic about their next last-minute savior.
January 3, 2012 2:24 pm
2 problems. 1) GM paid for Saab's budget and any tech is by definition GM tech not Saab tech. 2) There is a lot of passion for Saab but few people bought the cars and thats what killed the company...terminally low sales and insolvent. It doesn't make sense but for the sake of playing Devil's advocate here...the government could have bailed out Saab like the US did with GM & Chrysler...why didn't they ? Saab needs a strong corporate parent to supply $ and material supplies to survive and no one can honestly think Saab sales are going to rocket upwards...and that is what it will take to make a business case for an investor to put money into Saab. No matter how much we like Saab, it hasn't made money for decades.
January 3, 2012 7:15 am
Have any of you actually owned Saabs? I've had 4, a 1991 900 SPG, a 1990 9000 Aero, a 1995 900 SE, and i still have a 1999 9-5 Aero. I've had 2 pre-GM cars and 2 post-GM. Quality went down big time, price stayed the same. GM bought Saab for a few reasons, Saab just like Volvo has pioneered and patented quite a few technologies in regards to safety. They also have the longest history and most proven track record with Direct Ignition and Turbo engines. So they bought them for their technology/know how, especially in small displacement direct ignition turbo engines. In return in order for GM to get some of their money back what they did is they dumped components from their other sub-brands into Saabs. Stuff like handles, buttons, entertainment systems, sensors, all came from GM sub 25,000$ cars. But a saab 9-5 fully loaded was 56,000$, for that price you could of bought a similarly loaded if not better loaded Audi, Mercedes, BMW, Lexus. My 9-5 Aero is dead on the driveway right now because of an exploded GM sourced power steering line. EVERY single component that has gone wrong in my car has been a GM sourced item. I get you guys who think it must be the other way around, Saab was to blame just because it is the smaller guy, GM is too big to be guilty of any wrong doing. But Saab Cars were losing $ and by Swedish laws it had to be sold after not making $ for a certain amount of quarters. Saab itself pre-1994 actually made very decent cars, and produced some pretty great fighter jets, some of the best trucks in the world (owned by VW now and magically doing great), they produced weaponry and satellite launch platforms and rockets, air-air missiles and air-ground. The Swedish commercial laws are not the same as american laws, there is no such thing as bail-outs, or being in the red.
January 3, 2012 7:50 am
1 reply
True, the two Saabs I had (the one I still do) were both post GM and although very nice cars they lack quality, inside out. I also drive an Insignia and an Astra (GM cars) and they are both far superior to the Saabs. Why wasn't Opel hit with the same GM low quality? I can only assume that it was Saab's choice to go cheap. I may be wrong but seeing two GM brands, one middle range with decent quality and one upper range with lower quality, as a buyer/user I can only assume the obvious. Sorry Saab fans (I am one also) but to me it seems Saab had it coming and it was their choice.
January 3, 2012 8:45 pm
I wish luck to Saab. I'm kind of curious how GM is going to treat the Indian and Turkish investors, because they still have the say where their tech goes. Wonder how that is going to work out. It would be a lot easier on Saab if one of the major auto companies bought Saab instead, but right now Saab needs is lucky to have any investment interest at all right now.
January 2, 2012 6:50 pm
Yeah, good luch Saab.
BTW Brian, WCF site got filtered by Iranian gov today for an unknown reason. :Sigh:
January 3, 2012 3:27 am
Any buyer from the west? Common chicken investors, make something from this great factory. GOOD LUCK SAAB!
January 3, 2012 4:40 am
Its clear that companies are more interested in the manufacturing tech than the actual cars themselves as there is no real market for SAAB to justify a bidding war.
January 3, 2012 5:05 am
No matter about who is the owner, i just want to see somes saabs on roads... It's an original brand, like no other... please, save saab!!
January 3, 2012 9:26 am
If anyone it is Mahindra and Mahindra who could turn it around. They lost the bid of LR and Jag to fellow Indian house Tatas but they bought Ssangyong and few other small brands and turned them around and now they could very well do the same for SAAB. They have the pockets, knowhow, expertise, the knack and this could give them the dealership network in US for their other M&M products too.
January 3, 2012 10:07 am










