2012 Jaguar XKR-S Convertible debuts in L.A. [video]
XKR-S cabriolet variant features a supercharged 5.0-liter V8 engine with 550 PS (405 kW / 542 hp) and 680 Nm (501 lb-ft) of torque
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (13)
Love it, the best XK yet. However, it's ashame you have to be a country club going senior citizen to drive one. If Jaguar could find a marketing campaign to break the stereo-type and appeal to a younger generation that doesn't always require that you wear a collared shirt tucked in to have one they'd be good to go. The XJ's are well-designed too, but they're like Buick's in the sense that you very rarely if ever see someone under 65 driving one.
November 16, 2011 1:00 am
0-60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.2 and $138,000...
Camaro ZL1 0-60 mph (96 km/h) in 3.9 and $55,000... Ummmmmmmmm
November 16, 2011 1:35 am
buahaha camaro with an interior of a LEGO, no way near a jag
November 16, 2011 2:14 am
2 replies
I would rather own a Jag as well but you can't say the Jag interior is worth an extra $ 80,000 or so...and Jags depreciate much worse than their competitors.
November 16, 2011 3:28 am
camaro zl1 does 0-60 in 3.9 from a rolling start, which would equal around 4.2s from a normal start, so it's just like the jag. Not to mention crappy reliability and quality of the zl1
November 16, 2011 3:24 am
1 reply
camaro zl1 does 0-60 in 3.9 from a rolling start, which would equal around 4.2s from a normal start, so it's just like the jag. Not to mention crappy reliability and quality of the zl1
November 16, 2011 3:24 am
1 reply
camaro zl1 has 0-60mph in 3.9s from a rolling start which would equal to 4.2 when measured how it was measured in jag
November 16, 2011 3:24 am
You could save 40k and pick up the new C63 Black series, and it's just as quick....
November 16, 2011 8:17 am
Good car but the front looks stupid. I'll rather wait a year for the new SL63 than spending this amount of money on this Jag or buy a CLS63 with the performance package and save some $$.
November 16, 2011 7:57 am









