Ford details the 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine

 Ford details the 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine
Ford 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine - 11.11.2011

Debuts in the 2012 Focus (Euro-spec)

Ford has released new information about the 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine that will debut in the 2012 Focus (Euro-spec).

The three-cylinder mill has an aluminum cylinder head, an integrated exhaust manifold and an "innovative flywheel and front pulley design to counter engine vibration." There's also a turbocharger, direct injection and Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing (Ti-VCT).

Two versions will be available and the entry-level unit will produce 100 PS (74 kW / 99 hp) while emitting 109 g/km.  The high-performance variant will develop 125 PS (92 kW / 123 hp) and 170 Nm (125 lb-ft) of torque - 200 Nm (147 lb-ft) with overboost. In the Focus, it will consume approximately 5.0 l/100km (47 mpg US / 56.5 mpg UK) and have CO2 emissions of 114 g/km.

According to Ford CEO Alan Mulally, "The new 1.0-litre EcoBoost - and our entire family of EcoBoost engines - represent technology breakthroughs that deliver power, fuel efficiency and low CO2 emissions through turbocharging and direct injection."

The engine will eventually be offered in the 2012 B-MAX, before becoming available worldwide.

Source: Ford

Ford's Mulally Launches Production of High-Tech 1.0-litre EcoBoost Engine Delivering Class-Leading CO2 in Ford Focus

  • Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally launches production of new 1.0-litre EcoBoost in Cologne, Germany. Small but powerful engine will be available around the world
  • Ford invests €134 million ($200 million) in new production line at Cologne Engine Plant with state-of-the-art manufacturing technology 
  • The engine will debut in the European Ford Focus in early 2012, giving the Focus class-leading petrol CO2 emissions and fuel economy. It will subsequently be offered on the Ford C-MAX and the new B-MAX in Europe, and other Ford vehicles around the world
  • New 1.0-litre EcoBoost is Ford's smallest petrol engine. The turbocharged, direct injection engine delivers the combinations of 125PS with 114g/km CO2 and 100PS with 109g/km CO2 in the Ford Focus
  • The European-designed engine also will be built in Craiova, Romania, from early 2012, bringing total European production capacity to a potential 700,000 units per year in the years ahead, with annual worldwide production of up to 1.3 million engines anticipatedCOLOGNE, Germany, Nov. 9, 2011 - Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally today launched volume production of Ford's smallest petrol engine - a 1.0-litre, turbocharged, direct injection EcoBoost engine that will debut in Europe in early 2012 and ultimately be available worldwide.

Ford announced that when the 1.0-litre, three-cylinder EcoBoost engine debuts in the European Ford Focus, it will produce 125PS while delivering ultra-low petrol CO2 emissions performance of 114g/km - a level unmatched by Focus competitors. A 100PS version of the same engine will deliver outright best-in-class petrol CO2 emissions of 109g/km.

"The new 1.0-litre EcoBoost - and our entire family of EcoBoost engines - represent technology breakthroughs that deliver power, fuel efficiency and low CO2 emissions through turbocharging and direct injection," Mulally said. "These engines are delivering to our wonderful Ford customers the fuel-efficient vehicles they want and value and, in turn, contributing to the reduction of CO2 and fuel consumption."

Mulally was joined by Hannelore Kraft, prime minister of Nordrhein Westfalen, Germany, and Elfi Scho-Antwerpes, mayor of Cologne, for the event. Ford said it invested €134 million ($200 million) to develop a special high-tech line at the Cologne Engine Plant to build the engine. The plant's 870 employees will build up to 350,000 units a year of the new engine.

European production capacity could increase to up to 700,000 units per year as production of the new small EcoBoost engine at Cologne is joined by Ford's new engine plant in Craiova, Romania, in manufacturing the new 1.0-litre EcoBoost engine in early 2012. In the years ahead, Ford anticipates production to expand outside of Europe to deliver availability for customers around the world and global production of up to 1.3 million 1.0-litre EcoBoost engines per year.

The new small EcoBoost petrol engine

This new EcoBoost engine delivers performance to rival a traditional 1.6-litre engine and with significantly improved fuel efficiency and lower CO2 emissions. The 1.0-litre EcoBoost cylinder block can fit onto a sheet of A4 paper but delivers up to 125PS and 170Nm peak torque (with 200Nm overboost), giving it the highest power density of any Ford production engine to date.

"Ford's commitment to Germany as a high-tech manufacturing location is significant," Mulally said. "Nowhere outside of the U.S. do we have a stronger design engineering and manufacturing presence than we do here in Germany."

The small and powerful new EcoBoost is set to debut in the European Ford Focus in early 2012, and will deliver unrivalled petrol fuel economy of 5.0 l/100km and emissions of just 114g/km CO2 in 125PS form, with a 100PS version offering best-in-class CO2 emissions of 109g/km. The engine also will feature in the hot-selling Ford C-MAX, and in the new Ford B-MAX, which enters production in 2012. Further global applications for both the 125PS and 100PS variants will be announced by Ford later.

The 1.0-litre EcoBoost engine was developed by Ford experts across Europe, including engineers at Ford's European Research and Advanced Engineering Centre in Aachen, Germany, and the Dunton Technical Centre, UK.

"The new 1.0-litre EcoBoost engine is a true collaboration from start to finish with expertise from Ford specialists across Europe leveraged in designing both the engine and the cutting-edge facility in which it will be produced," said Stephen Odell, chairman and CEO, Ford of Europe.

"This will be reflected in the class-leading European CO2 emissions of the new 1.0-litre EcoBoost Ford Focus when it debuts in early 2012; low emissions that will be achieved alongside the spirited and refined performance that customers expect from Ford."

High-tech EcoBoost production

The advanced EcoBoost production facility at Ford's Cologne Engine Plant was designed by Ford's Manufacturing Engineering team, Dunton, UK, using Ford's Virtual Manufacturing laboratory, to offer maximum flexibility and efficiency. Nearly 100 new machining units and a 580-metre purpose-built assembly line have been installed.

Fifty-five automated and 14 semi-automated processes are used, alongside 90 work stations for skilled employees, helping to ensure the highest standards of quality and consistency in production. The technology is capable of machining to an accuracy of 10 microns, 10 to 20 per cent the width of a human hair.

Ford has introduced new manufacturing techniques that reduce the volume of coolant required when machining aluminium engine parts to just four or five millilitres per component from a previous requirement of up to two litres, a reduction of more than 99 per cent that contributes to a reduced environmental footprint from manufacturing.

New "cold testing" technology allows completed engines to be tested without being started - reducing fuel usage and CO2 emissions from the process by 66 per cent - while 100 per cent of the remaining energy required to run the plant comes from renewable sources. Total electricity demands have been reduced by 66 per cent compared with production of Ford's 4.0-litre V6 engine, which ends today at Cologne Engine Plant.

Add a Comment

Comments (16)

Subscribe to comments
 shaahinmt shaahinmt
THAT FLYWHEEL IS HUMONGOUS!
November 11, 2011 4:50 pm
 Primoz Primoz
Actually, the engine is small :P
+2
November 11, 2011 5:03 pm
 yiotis82 yiotis82
I hope they built a gearbox that can handle that torque. 1.0 liters engines have small clutch also and that's what is worrying me.
November 11, 2011 10:12 pm
 NicolaiOlufHemdrup NicolaiOlufHemdrup
Their is nothing ECO about 5 L/100 km. Perhaps in America. 3 L /100 km that is ECO.
-2
November 12, 2011 3:20 am
 MRAD MRAD
What are you on, not even the Prius gets 3L/100Km, it gets about 4.4L/100Km and that is held as the standard by which all other cars are judged right now for efficiency.
November 12, 2011 11:21 am
 CndSalesPro CndSalesPro
Actually the Prius can achieve 3.7/L per 100 kms.
November 15, 2011 1:40 pm
 MRAD MRAD
You're right on that, it can achieve that target, but I was going by the official Canadian rating I believe, the 3 would be closer to what the UK has it listed for the newer models. I guess it depends who you want to go by, but you are right on that.
November 16, 2011 6:34 am
 ScottCampbell ScottCampbell
I like these future engines. The car companies are really progressing on shaping the future more than are government can say with their stalemates all the time on different issues.
-1
November 12, 2011 6:27 am
 MRAD MRAD
Congratulations for, you managed to do with a turbo 1L engine with a unique design, what Toyota did about three years ago with the 1.3L four cylinder without boost as found in the Toyota IQ, being 5L/100km. I know this is a big deal for Ford, but really, this is all they could manage with all of the R&D that they put into this project. I'll be quite happy with my Scion IQ when I get it in a couple of months (still considering the new Yaris SE/RS though). Also, I don't believe their claims at all, I have driven the new Fiesta and that thing burned as much gas as a car three times its size, their mileage claim was a joke. Before you flame me, I have no problem with ford, check my garage on here and you will see I own a Ford legend, the XR3i Rally Car (with only 25,000Km on it still in perfect condition, now that is a Ford).
-1
November 12, 2011 11:19 am
 mechamynd mechamynd
downsizing is good
-1
November 13, 2011 1:43 am
 SainUK SainUK
MRAD, you will probaby find that the Ford will be able to deliver the economy easier than your IQ as the IQ is NA, therefore has to work harder to get to the torque levels. CO2 levels are probably lower as a result.
-1
November 14, 2011 4:19 am
 MRAD MRAD
I've driven many naturally aspirated and turbo charged cars, I can tell you that it won't be the case and by far that is pretty wrong. Unless Ford is using the type of turbo technology found in only the most premium of vehicles, there will still be a substantial amount of turbo lag, meaning that the initial torque required to get your car moving across a difficult incline won't be present until you get into the higher RPM range, meanwhile the naturally aspirated engine will be quite easily able to produce that power on demand. The IQ also comes in a turbo model, within Europe, where the efficiency is in fact greater on the naturally aspirated model, with more performance though coming out of the turbo engine. It's pretty clear if you just simply think about it, one car produces less power and requires a turbo to increase that power to compensate, getting said power at a specific RPM level and boost level (well you need to raise the pressure inside of the turbo for the power to start up), the other car has that same power at a lower level of RPM and can continue without the need to build up and purge that pressure on a regular basis. Turbos help get a lot more power and help with efficiencey, but in this case it is merely getting the same mileage and level of power from an engine that is smaller, in theory it should be able to put out more power if the turbo was better designed or at least give you the benefit of better mileage.
November 14, 2011 5:54 am
 sensei sensei
turbo lag in a 1.0L engine? You simply do not know of what you speak. I live in Japan and have driven turbo k-cars and Supras-R32 & R33 GTRs. Turbo lag is a thing of the past. hate on the Ford engine but don't make crap up.
November 16, 2011 4:01 am
 ValentinGilson ValentinGilson
Now, Ford: Do me a favour! Put 4 of them together in a V configuration. Integrate them in a DECENT looking coupe and I might buy a Ford again.
November 15, 2011 12:02 am
 ValentinGilson ValentinGilson
Should Ford consider Mahle`s CIC camshafts for such a small turbo engine? Cam-in-cam will supposedly eliminate turbo lag in small engines completely.
November 15, 2011 12:10 am
 MarvinMcConoughey MarvinMcConoughey
That is an excellent suggestion, with cost being the most likely reason for non-adoption. Even so, I expect one form or another of variable valve control to become nearly the norm on future engines. The downsizing trend has far to go.
April 13, 2012 8:35 am