Top Gear does the McLaren MP4-12C vs. the Ferrari 458 Italia comparison
Comparison test shows the McLaren is no slouch on the Top Gear track
Top Gear has finally given its domestic British fans something to cheer about.
The BBC2 program has tested the McLaren MP4-12C against the Ferrari 458 Italia...whereupon the local hero trounced its foreign rival on Top Gear's track.
The McLaren scored the second best-ever time on the Top Gear track with a lap time of 1 minute 16.2 seconds. The Ferrari was almost 3 seconds behind with the 458 notching a time of 1 minutes and 19.1 seconds.
Watch the video...if you can handle Jeremy Clarkson for that long.
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (38)
very strange result, in other reviews the 458 was a few tenth ahead and now 3 seconds behind?
July 12, 2011 11:11 am
All it means is that these cars had these times, on this track, on this day. As limited number production cars (ie. they don sell a quarter of a million of these annually), they can differ a lot from car to car (ie. a 458 can be vastly different from another 458, even if identically specced). All that it means another pair of stunners were driven by the most annoying car reviewer.............................................................................................................................
July 12, 2011 3:44 pm
..............................................................in the world...
July 12, 2011 3:44 pm
Strange result but to be honest I have noticed an alarming amount of bias coming from British magazines towards makes like Jaguar - put it this way, I drove an XF and thought it was a piece of junk, I drove a new 5 series and it was a lot better...yet all the mags are praising the Jag...must be bribes going on somewhere. Jeremy was like this towrds anything Ford related back in the day (Ford, Aston Martin, Jaguar etc.). It's just a pity we have junkers getting the nod over cars that are better in every way.
July 13, 2011 2:47 am
u have to take into consideration that the MP4 was developed on the Top gear test track.. so obviously it's very fast round here as they must have benchmarked the 458 during development..
July 12, 2011 11:18 am
true, but im sure ferrari had their engineers practically rebuild the car just like they do for every track review.
July 12, 2011 11:30 am
autocar magazine had the ferrari as the better car to buy, just! evo magazine and fifth gear has the mclaren on slower time than the ferrari around a track. autocar magazine has it all mixed up with allan muir saying there is zero understeer on the macca while matt prior says there is a lot and you need more of it to trigger the brake steer, I AM NOT JOKING about this, so it steers like a tank! if the mclaren was so good we wont be getting such a mix bag of results, the british are defending their pride...with a bag full of bull shit and shameless bias
July 12, 2011 12:31 pm
looks like a few ferrari fans are taking reality quite well...smoke up your pain incredulous FF's!
July 12, 2011 12:47 pm
Well I guess it is not so sensible to say that this car must be slower than the Ferrari, because it is almost certain that Mclaren will have used the 458 during the MP4-12C's development, so at least it has to be a bit better, otherwise where would all those R&D money have gone ? And most probably, they would now be jumping up and down with joy at their Woking HQ with a bit of pride as that lap time is a good ad tool !!
July 12, 2011 8:27 pm
although the mclaren made a blistering time, you can not forget what clarkson said in the end, which was the same conclusion of fifth gear: although this car can be faster then a 458, it lacks the feel of passion and soul of the ferrari, the thing that you can't explain or put your finger on. the first time i saw the mp4 i wasn't fascinated by it, although i knew that it would be a briliant car as performace goes, while the 458 mesmerized me for days, and for that, i would go for the ferrari. sometimes, only the numbers won't make a car excelent. at least this is my own opinion.
July 12, 2011 12:48 pm
no no. Dont mix it all up. Fifth gear not only said that the Mclaren lacks the soul, it also said the Mclaren was SLOWER!
July 12, 2011 2:16 pm
who cares how much "feel" a car has when it drives that fast. no one would ever notice other than people who are like trying find a fault with a car.
July 12, 2011 7:18 pm
Looks like the McLaren is built for a much broader public. Therefore even if you're not a track day master you can still have enough fun combined with a comfortable ride - smart! The Ferrari is a phenomenal car BUT few people would be capable of really pushing it hard enough and feel its soul.
July 12, 2011 1:00 pm
Whatever. If you watched Top Gear you'd see they unanimously favored the Ferrari over the McLaren.
July 12, 2011 3:35 pm
Eat it 458 you fugly pos! Fifth gear also said that they can't turn off traction control on the 12C, clearly it can be done... its that dum user thing as with a computer, its always the computers fault when something doesn't work when in actuallity its the user as the drivers in Fith Gear who clearly did not know how to drive the car and I don't care if they are or use to be pro racers. When the 458 was taking corners in front of the 12C on the Top Gear track it was clearly leaning unlike the 12C which looked like it was on rails and could take corners at much faster speeds. Guaranteed any customer spec 12C will take any customer spec 458 any day on any road or track any time!!
July 12, 2011 5:25 pm
'clearly' all driver aids were turned off in the 458 to make it look like it oversteers and does nothing else. 458 would eat this thing in race mode. so typical of poms. btw did u notice how 'smoothly' the 12C went through Bentley on the fast lap? it almost caused the car to spin (this is AFTER Clarkson used that very corner to show how 'smooth' the car is). What a sorry excuse for a review. Maybe they were paid by mclaren to make it 3 seconds faster than the 458 (because it clearly isnt). Everyone knows the 458 is better, fifth gear and autocar proved it. and the simple fact of the matter is, those two reviews are far more credible than this one.
July 13, 2011 1:56 am
Where did you see that the Mclaren traction control was off in TG?? Did you see Mclaren drifting in TG? NO you didnt! Only Ferrari was smoking its tires.
July 13, 2011 2:05 am
ok i dont know if you know much about cars, but if u want to make a car look more stable and therefore 'better', u turn the traction control on to prevent oversteer. and if u want to make a car look 'bad', u turn off the driver aids so it oversteers and looks uncontrollable. Knowing this, because they needed to make the mclaren look better, they left the driver aids on in the 12C, and turned the aids off in the 458! and hey presto, u have a biased car review!
July 13, 2011 2:10 am
TopGear is racist !!
if the car is British.. then it's the best!!
According to them:
- Rang Rover is the best 4?4 ( while porsche cayenne is ugly)
- Mclaren MP4 is better than Ferrari 458!!
- Mclaren F1 won in a drag race with Bugatti Veyron.
- Aston Martin, Jaguar, Bently... etc.
July 13, 2011 3:48 am
you're a deluded fool.
TG actually preferred the 458. even though the MP4 SMASHED it on the timed lap.
and for the record- compared to a range rover, the cayenne IS ugly, the Veyron did beat the McLaren F1.
get your facts straight rather than making 'racist' allegations. and by the way educate yourself too, preferring something because it is made at home in britain does not make oneself 'racist' - you're going on a completely different line.
Jeremy Clarkson is a legend! peace.
July 13, 2011 4:18 am
Since when did the Mclaren F1 won the drag race against the Bugatti?!?! did you ever watched the full video of that?! and if you watch this video about the MP4 carefully, you see that although in numbers could be better than a 458, in the end just misses the point of the supercar, the element of wowing people like a ferrari or pagani does with its presence. the lap time doesn't mean everything, it doesn't some-up what the car is... but in one thing i think that they should do, is to put the 458 again on the track, because the current time was done by "sacked-Stig" and not the new one, so it could be different.
July 13, 2011 6:50 am
What do you expect a British person working for the BBC to say? It's like, all American reviewers of cars will still have some sort of bias towards their US-built vehicles, isn't that fair? You'd always support your own side despite the fact that it maybe inferior.
July 14, 2011 11:43 pm
fsnas is spot on. Clarkson does promote british cars. 458 won timed tests in other mags - evo, car, 5th gear.
July 13, 2011 5:07 am
@nahidrahman
Jeremy Clarkson a legend? now you're the one who is the real deluded fool.
July 13, 2011 7:42 am
Stop bickering over times.
I've taken the same car, same day, to the same DRAG strip, and have times varying by 1 second. So different cars, different track, different drivers, different times.. and over a minute of racing, you will have VASTLY different times.
July 13, 2011 8:03 am
I think TG's typical British Bias was on show here. I will need to see more comparisons before believing there is THAT much difference on such a small track. Would still have the FAZ any day. It's got soul bro's..
July 13, 2011 4:15 pm
It's funny to hear people complaining about TG being biased. Of course they are biased and each of them, May, Clarkson, and Hammond have their own biases as well and they openly admit it on the show. Get over it.
July 13, 2011 7:26 pm
The only bad thing about the McLaren is that name! It sound like the model designation of a cheap blender.
July 14, 2011 5:30 am
Maybe the bafoons from Fith Gear should take lessons from an average journalist that took the 12C on the Top Gear track which he has never driven on and also had a passenger to boot and still achieved a time of 1:19.4, 0.3 seconds slower than the stig in the 458 Italia!!
http://www.carsguide.com.au/site/news-and-reviews/car-news/driving_on_the_uk_top_gear_track
July 15, 2011 6:11 am
Dont be missleaded, that particular driver is British touring car race winner and believe me he knows how to race a car on the track. Dont think that "Stig" is the best driver on the world or even quickest for each of the car that he drives. And dont think that knowing the figure-of-eight 2.8km long track layout will give u so big advantage (of few secs). Between proper race drivers maybe in 0. something secs. Passenger onboard is something to add (you lose time on acceleration and something less on carrying speed true corners) but considering all that on a 2.8km distance 3secs faster than f458, cmon?!? 1:19.4 is the best time he did and believe me he did a lot of laps to get to that time. Thats 0.3 secs off the time Stig did with f458 but without passaanger. That sounds more like it. So if MP4 has a little advantage in setup suitable for that particular track that should be reasonable lap time. It is unreal that TopGear squeezed out more than 3secs out of that time even without passanger. The man didnt have elephant onboard! As you can see all F1 drivers in TopGear did 1.44 something depending their skills and track conditions, but even them cannot pull out 3 secs out from that car compared to other fast drivers. They are in raceing from childhood but fast "unexperienced" driver can get to 1:45 something. So I believe 1.19.4 for MP4 with passenger onboard is something like much more honest time.
July 15, 2011 7:33 am
Little digression...I race cars semipro for a long time and I must say that Mclaren MP4 time is unreal. I dont want to dig out the reasons why they (topGear)did make that time official but as we know there could be tons of reasons. Ill only speak about why is that time almost impossible. I say almost just because we can agree that is possible to have two very different drivers driven Mclaren and Ferrari, two very different weather conditions or car setups (electronic aids, rubbers, etc.). But for real and honest comparison between MP4-12c and F-458 all that had to be equal. It is possible that MP4 was developed on that particular track and therefore it shoul or colud get the best result out of it but 3sec better time on 2.8kn track with 12 turns sounds impossible. Based on this data just try to imagine what should we expect from "theRing" time where MP4 should be at its best due to slightly better power/weight ratio on the track configuration with much more straights and overall much lenght where . Dont even have to mention track distance that "the Ring" has.
Even from the TopGear track records its possible to see that 3secs is difference like lightyears between some of the cars. For example that is like raceing Ferrari Enzo wich is much more powerfull and real raceing car against Porsche 997 Turbo but cabrio wich is much more havier and 170ps less powerfull car. Dont even need to tell you how cabrios react on a twisty track. I could go further in details but only from these assumptions it is clear that something went realy wrong from TopGear crew in comparing those two cars. Sorry about my english as Im not from your country.
July 15, 2011 6:29 am
Cant wait to see where will new lambo Aventador and up on that list. With even better power to weight ratio, all wheel drive, new angine and again different suspension approach (push road) it will be very interesting.
July 15, 2011 7:51 am









