'Tragic ex-hero' Schumacher should retire again - Hakkinen

 Tragic ex-hero Schumacher should retire again - Hakkinen
Vitantonio Liuzzi (ITA), Force India F1 Team and Michael Schumacher (GER), Mercedes GP Petronas crashed - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 19, Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, 14.11.2010 / Copyright: Batchelor / xpb

Michael Schumacher is a "tragic ex-hero" who should return immediately to retirement.

That is the view of Mika Hakkinen, who was once named as the only rival the seven time world champion truly feared.

The Finn has issued a harsh critique of Schumacher in a column for the Munich newspaper TZ, despite the pair always referring to each other with the greatest of respect.

"Michael is for me now a tragic ex-hero," 42-year-old Hakkinen wrote after the final race of Schumacher's comeback year; the only full season in the German's entire career that did not net even a single podium.

"I ask myself why on earth he got back into the cockpit. There is the most successful man in motor sport driving down in the pack and making a ridiculous mistake in Abu Dhabi that almost cost him his life," he added.

Hakkinen is referring to his spin on the first lap that resulted in Tonio Liuzzi's Force India riding over Schumacher's Mercedes and almost striking his head.

Afterwards, Schumacher admitted the incident gave him a fright and a trip to the medical centre, but has pledged to return in 2011.

But "What a tragedy this would have been for the Germans -- and on the day of Vettel's triumph," said Hakkinen.

"What has the man who has won more than anyone else still to prove?" Hakkinen wondered. "In my view, he is dismantling his own legacy bit by bit.

"And I see it making no difference whether it is for technical reasons or because he can no longer keep up with the boys."

Hakkinen said he can understand Schumacher's urge to return to action after three years of retirement.

"After three years I returned to the cockpit myself -- for Mercedes in the DTM," he recalled. "And I also had to recognise that even as a formula one world champion, there are no gifts for the older ones.

"I won only three times more," said Hakkinen.

"You can neither stop the wheel of time, nor turn it back," he insisted.

"Personally, we were never close friends because he always came across, to me anyway, a little bit too arrogant."

Source: GMM

Add a Comment

Comments (11)

Subscribe to comments
 loki loki
Well, Schumacher is a great champion (if not the greatest). All great champions were a bit like that. All great champions were selfish and over aggressive. That's that! Anyways, let the man be. He came back to have fun. Hakkinen was simply too out of shape and lacked determination. And if he'd died what? He was doing his favorite thing in the world - racing at the highest level. Just give him a break. He isn't here to prove anything anymore, just to have fun.
November 17, 2010 9:54 am
 bone91 bone91
so you are saying Mercedes GP paid millions of dollars to Schumacher just to have fun?!?? I don't think so...
November 17, 2010 1:46 pm
 dmanero dmanero
I wouldn't call him the great champion, if you want a true champion, it would be sabastien loeb, and unoffical told by many to be the greatest driver. But I still think that there are better F1 driver out there, Senna, Prost and probably a few more pior to them. If shumacher was should a great driver, her would have over come his technical difficults and won a race or two, but he could even have done that, I aggree with Hakkinen, Michael is becoming the laughing stock of F1. He should have stay retire.
November 18, 2010 7:33 am
 kooper kooper
We're talking about Michael Schumacher for goodness' sake. If he wants to race, let the man race. MB will eventually let him go if he doesn't cut the mustard, but what difference does it make if he races on and fails to win a single race -or finish on the podium for that matter- for another season? That will not take away from the fact that he's won more pole positions, races and championships than anyone else. It does speak volumes for his love of racing that he's still willing and eager to race on against the current crop of F1 "superstars". How is that a bad thing exactly? EDIT: I completely agree with you btw, Loki.
November 18, 2010 2:36 pm
 loki loki
No, they paid to have the Michael Schumacher brand name, fans, media attention, experience and personality to a team that, at the end of day is new in F1. If they can have victories and a championship on the top of that, it's even better. But I'm sure it wasn't the main point.
November 17, 2010 1:52 pm
 astroturf777 astroturf777
there is absolutely no validity in any of this. fact: brawn spent nothing in 2009 developing the 2010 car fact: mercedes came late to the table - ie. any development budget was hampered by the minimal testing and timeframe - they pumped their car out in the same time as lotus/virgin... and were just a bit quicker! fact: mercedes have been working on their 2011 car for 2 months already - with schumacher who is employed more for his abilities at communicating with engineers/designers (testing feedback) than anything fact: read back to the february articles with schumacher. they were never pushing for a win or a title in 2010, it was a formation year. if a car designed and built for schumacher isnt enough to deliver him wins etc then let hakkinen have a say. it was TEAM ORDERS that gave him his win in 1998 in melbourne and his subsequent first world title.
November 17, 2010 10:08 pm
 liquid stereo liquid stereo
This may be true but Brawn spent nothing in 2008 either. They inherited Honda's car. Honda sat out the previous year. Don't get me wrong, I'm not denying the 2009 championship but let's be serious. Brawn did what Mercedes did. Only one year earlier. The difference is that Honda had a very good car that Brawn inherited. Brawn had no money so did not develop the car that is now Mercedes. This is no surprise.
November 18, 2010 9:59 am
 kooper kooper
@liquid_stereo I don't think that's entirely accurate. The Brawn 2009 car was essentially the car that was developed under the then 2008 Honda banner, it just inherited a Mercedes engine. The car would've been developed properly in 2008 for the 2009 season, which happens to be the season Brawn won the title. The 2010 MB car did not enjoy the same level of development as the 2009 Brawn. You can look at 2009's declining performance of the Brawn for proof that the team barely had enough resources to keep improving the 2009 car... They now have more resources at their disposal than they did in 2009, but even now they do not have the same level of resources as, say, Ferrari or McLaren or RB has.
November 19, 2010 12:50 am
 DUCATI46 DUCATI46
Mika is right... it pains me to say it... as a fan of Schumacher from the day he jumped in the Jordan F1 team and woke everyone up at Spa, i'd always be more than happy to see him wipe the floor with Mika, Jacques and Hill but Mika is right. He has nothing to prove and bumbling along mid pack is not going to help his legacy as an F1 champion one of the greatest. Micheal should step back. If he misses the buzz of racing maybe DTM or BTCC would be a good idea instead, otherwise he is in great danger of being the greatest ever that couldn't walk away and all the titles race wins and fastest laps will be forgotten.
November 18, 2010 1:54 am
 Cale24 Cale24
Extremely harsh words from Hakkinen- no more hugs in the paddock at re-unions.
November 18, 2010 5:41 am
 liquid stereo liquid stereo
It turns out that this "interview" is a set of lies. An apology has been issued and the writer lost his/her job.
November 19, 2010 6:07 am