Japanese brands still dominate U.S. reliability survey

 Japanese brands still dominate U.S. reliability survey
Japanese auto maker logos collage

Toyota's Scion brand was the most reliable marque in the Consumer Reports survey

The 2010 Consumer Reports vehicle reliability survey is out for this year and it is still the Japanese brands that dominate the top of the list.

Of the 10 most reliable marques, Toyota's Scion brand came in first, with only a single U.S. automaker in the top ten - Ford came in at number 10.

Two European automakers made the top ten, Porsche was number 2 and Volvo placed 8th in the survey. Toyota did not suffer much for its recent recall woes, coming in at number 6. All three Toyota brands, including Lexus at number 9, were in the top ten.

The survey, though, featured great improvements for GM and Ford. GM's Cadillac brand was up by 7 over last year's ranking. Chevy and GMC also were up, although, Buick came down in its ranking.

The news was not good for the other German premium brands - Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz, which all came in towards the bottom of the list - 26, 23 and 22, respectively - and were all down compared to last year, including BMW Group's MINI brand which came in at number 25. Those brands were beat out by the likes of Buick, Cadillac and Jeep in terms of reliability.

Of the 27 brands ranked, Chrysler came in last.

Source: Consumer Reports

Consumer Reports' 2010 Annual Car Reliability Survey: GM Makes Big Strides While Honda, Toyota Dominate

European reliability rally stalls: Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz among the worst

YONKERS, N.Y., Oct. 26 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- General Motors has improved considerably, though Honda and Toyota still dominate in the latest predicted-reliability Ratings of new cars, according to Consumer Reports' 2010 Annual Auto Survey. Eighty-three percent of Chevrolets, GM's major brand, now have average or better scores in predicted reliability, up from 50 percent last year.

The results were announced today at an Automotive Press Association luncheon in Detroit.

Multimedia information is available at http://consumerreports.presslift.com/auto-reliability-survey-findings-2010.  

While some GM nameplates had been among the least reliable brands in past years, they now rank above some major European competitors such as Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz. Two factors are aiding GM's reliability improvements. First, GM's recent introductions, such as the Chevrolet Camaro and Equinox, Buick LaCrosse V6 (FWD), and Cadillac SRX, are proving reliable from the time they were launched. In addition, GM shed many models with subpar reliability when it shut down the Saturn,Pontiac, and Hummer brands. Even some older models, such as the Chevrolet Avalanche, Corvette, and Suburban have improved to average.

As a company, GM is still a ways from the top when it comes to reliability—the major Asian automakers, including Honda and Toyota, are still out in front. Among the three domestics, Ford continues to build the most reliable vehicles. Chrysler lags behind both GM and Ford.

Still, GM made the most progress of the three domestic manufacturers in this survey. Across GM brands (Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, and GMC), 69 percent of models had average or better reliability. Cadillac improved the most, rising seven places from last year's ranking. Chevrolet had its best showing in years; 83 percent of models had average or better scores in predicted reliability, up from 50 percent.

In the new survey, based on 1.3 million vehicles, ninety percent of Fords, including Lincoln models, have at least average reliability. As a brand, Ford now outranks Mazda and Nissan and ranks just below Lexus. Its quality renaissance has been led by the Fusion, a design that has been very reliable since its debut five years ago. Ford vehicles are tops for reliability in two categories: family cars (Fusion Hybrid) and large SUVs (Ford Flex EcoBoost).

"General Motors and Ford have taken different paths to improving reliability," said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports Auto Test Center. "Some of GM's redesigned vehicles have scored well. The company has also dropped many of its below-average models. Ford has put its emphasis on fine-tuning existing platforms and limiting the number of new-model introductions."

Chrysler Corporation hasn't shared in the success of the other Detroit manufacturers. The Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep brands are saddled with dated models. Twelve of the 20 models that CR had sufficient data for rate below average in reliability. None of Chrysler Corporation's models score above average. With Fiat's acquisition of Chrysler, many of its products will either be replaced or redesigned in the near future.

Asia Still Dominates:

Despite recent safety recalls, Toyota models, including those from Scion and Lexus, remained among the most reliable and earned top scores in five vehicle categories: small cars (Yaris), midsized SUVs (FJ Cruiser), luxury SUVs (Lexus LX), minivans (Sienna V6, FWD), and full-size pickups (Tundra V6). Only the all-wheel-drive Lexus GS and the new Lexus IS 250 convertible are below average. The redesigned 2010 Toyota Prius, hurt by antilock brake problems on early vehicles, scored only average. That is quite a drop from previous years.

Honda and Acura are among the top four brands along with Porsche and Scion, with their models topping five vehicle categories—upscale cars (Acura TL, FWD) , luxury cars (Acura RL), small SUVs

(CR-V), upscale compact SUVs (Acura RDX) and compact pickups (Ridgeline). Problems with rear brake pads help drop the 4-cylinder Accord and Acura TSX to average.

Hyundai and Kia continued to do well, with only one model, the Kia Sedona minivan, rated below average. All six new models for 2010 (Hyundai Genesis Coupe, Sonata, and Tucson; Kia Forte, Sorento, and Soul) had average or better reliability, an impressive first-year showing.

Nissan's mainstream models scored well. The Altima and Maxima sedans; the Murano and Pathfinder SUVs all rated average or better in predicted reliability. The Titan had shown improvement in the last year or two, but both 2WD and 4WD versions have once again dropped to below average reliability. The small Nissan Cube had a below average score in its first appearance in Consumer Reports survey. The Infiniti models were all average or better.

Subaru had a good record overall, with a top rating going to the four-cylinder Legacy sedan and the non-turbo version of the Forester SUV. The WRX was the only model that rated below average.

Europe's Bumpy Road:

While European reliability had been improving, momentum seems to have stalled. All Porsche and Volvo models are rated average or better. But Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz are among the worst automakers overall in terms of reliability.

BMW had a bad year, with five of its 11 models scoring below average. While the BMW M3 topped the sporty cars category, the 1-, 3-, and 5-Series models with the 3.0-liter turbocharged (N54) engine had high problem rates related to the fuel system, among other gripes.

Six of Mercedes-Benz's 13 models were below average, and the GLK SUV was far below average. However, the redesigned E350 sedan was above average, a promising start. The new E-Class coupe, a wholly different car from the E-Class sedan, languished in the bottom ranks.

Nearly three-quarters of the Audi models Consumer Reports analyzed were below average. The A6 with the new supercharged 3.0-liter V6 was tied with the Jaguar XF for the worst new car prediction score. Volkswagen did better, with its Golf, formerly the Rabbit, doing very well and the various Jetta models scoring average or better.

The Porsche Boxster has the best predicted reliability score in Consumer Reports survey, while the Audi A6 3.0T and Jaguar XF have the worst.

Consumer Reports' Auto Reliability Survey Details:

Findings are based on responses on 1.3 million vehicles owned or leased by subscribers to Consumer Reports or its Web site, www.ConsumerReports.org . The survey was conducted in the spring of 2010 by Consumer Reports' National Survey Research Center and covered model years 2001 to 2010.

Consumer Reports' expert team of statisticians and automotive engineers used the survey data to predict reliability of new 2011 models. Predicted reliability is Consumer Reports' forecast of how well models currently on sale are likely to hold up. To calculate predicted-reliability ratings, CR averages the overall reliability scores (used car verdicts) for the most recent three model years, provided that the model remained unchanged in that period and also didn't substantially change for 2011. If a model was new or redesigned in the past couple of years, one or two years' data may be used, or if that's all that's available. On rare occasions Consumer Reports make predictions for a newly redesigned model, but only if previous versions had outstanding reliability.

Consumer Reports Annual Auto Survey Reliability Ratings are unrelated to Consumer Reports vehicle road-test results, but are a key factor in determining whether or not Consumer Reports recommends a car. CR only recommends models that have performed well in tests conducted at its 327-acre Auto Test Center in Connecticut, and that have average or better predicted reliability based on its annual survey. In addition, vehicles must perform at least adequately in government or insurance-industry crash and rollover tests, if tested, and have electronic stability control (ESC) readily available in a mainstream high-volume trim line in order to be Recommended by Consumer Reports.

Full reliability history charts and predicted-reliability ratings on hundreds of 2011 models, plus a list of what's up and what's down, best and worst models, and a comparison chart of brands can be found online at www.ConsumerReports.org , in the December issue and in the latest Consumer Reports Carspublication, Best & Worst New Cars for 2011($7.99 U.S./$8.99 Canada), on sale November 16, 2010everywhere magazines are sold.

NOVEMBER 2010

The material above is intended for legitimate news entities only; it may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. Consumer Reports® is published by Consumers Union, an expert, independent nonprofit organization whose mission is to work for a fair, just, and safe marketplace for all consumers and to empower consumers to protect themselves. We accept no advertising and pay for all the products we test. We are not beholden to any commercial interest. Our income is derived from the sale of Consumer Reports®, ConsumerReports.org® and our other publications and information products, services, fees, and noncommercial contributions and grants. Our Ratings and reports are intended solely for the use of our readers. Neither the Ratings nor the reports may be used in advertising or for any other commercial purpose without our permission. Consumers Union will take all steps open to it to prevent commercial use of its materials, its name, or the name of Consumer Reports®.

SOURCE Consumer Reports

CONTACT: Douglas Love, +1-914-378-2437, dlove@c

Add a Comment

Comments (16)

Subscribe to comments
 B_M_Gearhead B_M_Gearhead
Consumer Reports are to the auto industry like Vegans are to the food industry. Sure if you don't eat meat you can be healthy but your food is going to taste like crap because animals are friggin delicious. If your a sensible human being, that takes no risk in life, comes to a complete stop at a yellow light and can count to 5 before the thing turns red, then sure listen the the magazine and buy a Camry, Accord, or whatever. But if you are passionate about life, like a little spice, and are a true auto enthusiast then go out and purchase the brand of your choice. I'd much rather sit in a Chevy dealership once a month getting something fixed on my truck (which never happens ever, its bomb proof) then spend one minute behind the wheel of a Prius.
October 27, 2010 4:51 pm
 otakki otakki
Or maybe I should get a Porsche instead. S-class and 7-series, stand aside. Panamera, here I come!!!
October 27, 2010 7:05 pm
 bone91 bone91
dude, why would you compare your chevy truck to a prius? Is that the level of comparison for chevy trucks? anyway, I would rather be in a Toyota Hilux "invincible" than a chevy. oh ya! have you heard about chevy volt?
October 27, 2010 10:00 pm
 Douglas6250 Douglas6250
I agree with you. Most of the Japanese cars we see on the road everyday are basically what you say really. For practical, down to earth people that don't want any trouble.
October 28, 2010 5:44 am
 B_M_Gearhead B_M_Gearhead
Bone, DUDE, I see no comparison made between my truck and a Prius. I spoke of no evaluation of the similarities and differences of these two products. I was just stating personal preference. That Hilux is pretty awesome in my opinion as well but it's not available here in the states, and to tell you the truth I'd still rather drive my Chevy 130,000 miles, original battery, brake pads, and everything else. Only things I replaced are oil and filter, and wiper blades and tires.
October 28, 2010 9:34 am
 CndSalesPro CndSalesPro
B_M_Gearhead... It is available here, its call the Tacoma?
October 28, 2010 9:38 pm
 schizo schizo
Aren't the cars mentioned for GM's improvement based on global platforms developed outside the US??? Also, I'm glad all things do not happen just like Consumer Reports predicts... I've had the W202, W203 (2 of them), W204 C-Class, and the W211 (previous generation E-Class) and all of them except the C32 AMG have been bullet proof! Only time I've been to the service center was to get the scheduled maintenance done...and I drive the crap out of my cars! So maybe Merc's need to be abused not driven like grand pa (the average age and driving style of a MB customer...) to keep it functioning properly????
October 27, 2010 6:59 pm
 BadMrSnake BadMrSnake
It also says that european cars Audi,BMW, & Mercedes are garbage!
October 27, 2010 9:54 pm
 ClintonM3 ClintonM3
This survey has always been flawed for years. They only survey Consumer Report subscribers, which IMO are opinionated and biased. A minimum of 100 surveys is all they need to get rated. So high volume cars with a better than average reliability will actually flare better than reality. And low volume cars will look worse than they actually are.
October 27, 2010 10:31 pm
 Ferrariguy Ferrariguy
Some of you guys need to read a little better. It NEVER said European cars are garbage. Reliability isn't their main forte. And that has to do with mostly electronics, which euro cars were never strong in. engine and transmissions have mostly all been bulletproof. Also Porsche finished 2nd. that is damn good. So stop whining, and getting your panties in a bunch. It's rated RELIABILITY and nothing more. If you like it, buy it, stop bitching!
October 27, 2010 10:41 pm
 BavarianMS BavarianMS
As someone already beat me to it, these consumers reports don't mean very much. Oh yeah and Porsche FTMFW.
October 28, 2010 12:12 am
 Edison Edison
My hats off to the Japanese brands, they recognize value. Job well-done. I commend the American brands as well (except Chrysler) for making quality cars which are looking ever more appealing and, some of which, I would choose over the comparable foreign brands. Even though my family mostly drives German cars (2 of which are 15 years old with well over 100k on the clock) and have had good experiences, I think the German brands should focus more on reliability and testing in general rather than rushing products to market, since they are asking a higher price. The other German companies should look to Porsche and learn as Porsche car are technologically advanced (crazy chassis and engine electronics and interior amenities) but are still reliable (family member has a 997 and is very reliable). They can also look to VW, because they used to be at the bottom of the charts and have since focussed on reliability and have done very well recently. I think the only VW car that brings down the score now is the old and outdated Touareg. Some of the brands suffering right now are due to certain models with specific engines. Example is BMW cars equipped with N54 engines. This engine is an engineering masterpiece but has been dogged by weak HPFP. Hopefully this issue is solved in the N55. I quite frankly can't understand Mercedes Benz's relatively poor performance, my family has had great experiences with them, and I know that they have improved further in the last 3 years or so. Correct me if I am wrong but I believe they place very high in initial quality, at odds with its ranking here.
October 28, 2010 10:27 am
 arnold812 arnold812
Most people really don't understand Consumer Reports and how they come to their ratings. They are based on surveys, "predicted reliability" as they call it. It is based on "perception of reliablility" as opposed to actual reliability of the vehicle. And we all know how "reliable" sheeps I mean people are.
October 29, 2010 9:54 am