BMW to launch FWD compact model range in U.S.

 BMW to launch FWD compact model range in U.S.
2003 BMW 3 Series Compact

New FWD model or models will come in at least 3 bodystyles and will be introduced before 2013

BMW will sell a compact, front-wheel drive model below the 1-Series in the U.S. market, according to a report by Automotive News.

BMW had previously announced that it will build a front-wheel drive model smaller than the 1-Series to be sold under the BMW badge to compete against the likes of the Audi A1 in Europe and other global markets. It would be built on a platform shared with MINI able to produce both front and all-wheel drive vehicles. Now, the Bavarian brand has confirmed that the new class of car(s) will also make it stateside.

BMW has hinted in past that the new front-wheel drive architecture will be used for more than a single model and the report refers to a "family of cars" with front-wheel drive that will be sold in the United States. BMW will not specify if they intend to launch a variety of models or a single model sold in different body styles.

"It will be a relatively big segment because we have several body styles," Ian Robertson, sales and marketing chief at BMW AG, told Auto News in an interview at the Paris motor show.

BMW has labeled this new class of vehicle the UKL.

The new front-wheel drive BMW/s will come with 4-cylinder engines in at least 3 body-style variants and will have an initial global volume of around 100,000 units. The models will be introduced before the arrival of the mega-city electric car in 2013, Robertson said.

BMW has previously released a survey in which 80 percent of 1-Series owners believed the car to be a front-wheel drive. The BMW brand is still strictly a rear-wheel drive product.

Source: autonews.com (sub req)

Add a Comment

Comments (21)

Subscribe to comments
 ClintonM3 ClintonM3
80% of 1 series owners are clueless wannabes. Maybe this will be the start of another micro car era. I love the original fiat 500s, Abarths, minis and Isettas.
October 1, 2010 9:39 am
 japalexdk japalexdk
A BMW should never have anything other than rear wheel drive (apart from X cars obviously) otherwise the whole ultimate driving machine thing is out of the window. DONT DO IT!!!!
October 1, 2010 9:53 am
 rnsaza rnsaza
Have you driven a MINI? It is FWD and there isn't much wrong with how BMW did that is there?
October 1, 2010 3:07 pm
 CReeds CReeds
That thing looks just plain dorky. I think it should be labelled the CH-UKL...as in LMAO!
October 1, 2010 10:19 am
 BavarianMS BavarianMS
That is an old e46 in-case you didn't know. If they figure out a way to make FWD be good on their cheapest models, they should do it. It shouldn't bother anyone because their selection of variety is already to big so its not like your choices are being limited.
October 1, 2010 12:52 pm
 CReeds CReeds
@BavarianMS - Dorky then, dorky now. And admittedly, I do not follow bmw as closely as you do. I too, would not fault them for going fwd on their cheapest models. However, I think it is quite poetic after years of bmw and fan-boys bashing the competition and declaring rwd a cornerstone of brand superiority.
October 2, 2010 9:54 am
 BavarianMS BavarianMS
That car is dorky and was the lowest class of the e46 3 series. The US never received it so it never mattered. I have nothing against bashing a FWD BMW....So bash away...I would bash it to if I continued to bash other FWD cars. The way I see it is, FWD and daily driving=ok. FWD and performance driving....that is different.
October 2, 2010 5:01 pm
 clash_189 clash_189
Making smaller car than 1 series with RWD will be awesome, but it can not be more than a two seater car as even in 1 series, the back is completely rubbish. However as A1 is a preferable to be driven only for two persons then why bother to give the damn useless back seat and therefore RWD is not completely idiot. Then if the three models are hatchback, cc style and van like pullman, it is still reasonable to imply RWD over FWD. Unfortunately, BMW plans to develop it as "family car" and as I know, now we get nothing of RWD MPV. Poor BMW, why they just don't bother use peugeot brad with slightly upmarket class and write "BMW for Peugeot". Don't really pleasant with this idea of FWD MPV since I do hope if BMW builds a family car, it would be still a RWD or at least with 4WD, 6 seats, new 1.6l turbo petrol and the usual 2.0l TD and not this Toyota route to give us uninteresting family car (except for the Velfire design though other than exterior, it is still a boring Toyota MPV).
October 1, 2010 10:21 am
 valantise46 valantise46
i understand that is difficult to make a tiny car rear-wheel drive(smaller than the 1-series).but is a SHAME.bmw and FWD dont match.i guess that new car will not be the ultimate driving machine...
October 1, 2010 10:28 am
 N20_Purge N20_Purge
First the recalls, now they are considering making a FWD car. Seems to be a dark day for BMW fanboys, while I sit back and laugh at them. :D
October 1, 2010 10:37 am
 6SPEEDV8 6SPEEDV8
Why, BMW.
October 1, 2010 12:38 pm
 BackInTheRealWorld BackInTheRealWorld
Holy crap 80% of your clientelle didn't know the only differentiating factor between the 1series and every other car in its class. A sad word we live in. If thats true bmw should have saved themselves the bother and just platform shared with mini from the start, the back area would have been saved a huge transmission tunnel.
October 1, 2010 6:05 pm
 Mikeado Mikeado
Oh well. We've got Lotuses designed by complicating-and-adding-weight, we've got a Porsche SUV, a 2WD Land Rover, a baby Rolls-Royce, why the hell not have a FWD range of BMWs? Clearly the term "brand heritage" is defunct these days. Besides, after making the X6M, they can't exactly damage their reputation any further...
October 1, 2010 6:39 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
the truth is that no one really cares about brand heritage.
October 2, 2010 8:47 am
 bone91 bone91
yup, its all about money
October 3, 2010 8:31 am
 BOOGIE_WOOGIE BOOGIE_WOOGIE
Wow, so many spastic comments. Has the IQ on here just dropped a notch. Its all about brand expansion. This is a business people. Why is that so hard to understand. That said i fully expect Mercedes to follow with a model of their own to combat the A1 and the upcoming entry level BMW.
October 1, 2010 10:17 pm
 japalexdk japalexdk
@rnsaza Have you ever seen a BMW badge on a mini, no thats because it is a seperate division, they even have their own dealerships to keep them apart from the BMW Brand.
October 3, 2010 5:09 am
 Han Solo Han Solo
I agree with japalexdk, BMW should never venture into FWD cars...Please don't do it BMW...you don't have to follow the rest of the crowd...you are different. Maybe you don't realize it, but that is your market advantage...originality...keep it. You already have a beautiful line up. People love BMWs because they are nice to drive...and you know why...because they are RWD. In my opinion RWD cars are always better to drive compared to FWD cars.
October 3, 2010 10:19 pm
 Han Solo Han Solo
I would like to add a bit... Mercedes A Class...worse handling car ever...you know why...cause its FWD...bad choice Mercedes. Merc B Class...also FWD..but it survives only because of the longer wheelbase. However, any other Mercedes like C, E, S, CLK, SLK, CL, CLS 55 AMG, SL 55 AMG they are all very very nice to drive... you know why, because they are all RWD cars...I'm not boasting guys... I just know this cause I used to work in a Mercedes Assembly Plant and then I moved to one of their Dealerships. I used to test all those beauties when I was managing their PDI Station. I have also tested some of BMW's best RWD cars (i used to work in their plant also before Mercedes) like the E39 (5 series), E46 (3 Series) and the E90 (3 Series). I think the best handling RWD car ever is the BMW E39 (5 Series)...wow what a car man...
October 3, 2010 10:31 pm
 ddee63x ddee63x
@ Bavarian MS.. Hey, that BMW Compact did make it to the US. It was introduced in 1995 and discontinued in 1999. Quote: "When introduced in the United States and Canada, despite being reasonably priced, starting at $19,900 (USD), the 318ti never enjoyed popularity in North America. While consumers desired a less expensive BMW, North American consumers, America in particular, dislike the hatchback bodystyle. Also the popularity of sport utility vehicles at the time overshadowed the compact BMW."
October 8, 2010 1:41 am
 Low-Fa Low-Fa
C'mon man........
October 11, 2010 7:27 pm