Ferrari Enzo successor going hybrid - report

 Ferrari Enzo successor going hybrid - report
New Ferrari Enzo artist sketch

Expected in 2012

In an interview with Automotive News Europe, Ferrari Chairman Luca Cordero di Montezemolo has reaffirmed his commitment "... to shape the next product cycle at Ferrari ."

While he declined to go into a lot of detail, he said the company's Enzo replacement will "...incorporate the state of the art of our knowledge in terms of increasing performances while reducing fuel consumption and emissions. It will then influence all Ferraris that appear after it." Despite being rather vague, the company previously stated the model will be a hybrid and use a kinetic energy recovery system like the HY-KERS concept.

To further reduce fuel consumption and emissions, the car will be smaller than the Enzo. Nothing is concrete at the moment, but the 2007 Millechili concept gives some indication of Ferrari's desire to make supercars smaller.

The model is expected to be unveiled in 2012, so expect to learn more in the coming months and years.

Source: Autoweek

Add a Comment

Comments (28)

Subscribe to comments
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
A very unfortunate reality. Given the reception of Porsche's 918, I'm not surprised by this move at all. I guess the only thing we can ask for is that it drives like it should, sounds like it should, looks like it should, and most importantly is as fast as it should be. Damned green bastards.
September 9, 2010 8:34 am
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
I don't have an issue with hybrids or other green technologies. As you sayi, of it looks, sounds and drives like it should then who cares? I'm all for cars being more efficeint -- it's just doing their job better.
September 9, 2010 9:48 am
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
I agree, but given the choice I prefer the old way of supercars, that is absurdly high speed with absurdly low mileage and minimal practicality. All the best supercars had those traits.
September 9, 2010 9:58 am
 Edison Edison
@dbehmoarass. So you are saying that supercars should be worse in order to be better? I think you have it wrong. Supercars should be about fascination and pushing the envelope of performance and technology. Why shouldn't the premier supercar manufacturers attempt to make a car that is both outrageously fast plus practical? To me that is almost X-prize stuff, and I applaud it. If it were up to you supercars would still be carbureted POSs and not the technological masterpieces they are now. I vote for progress.
September 9, 2010 1:32 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Well yes and no. There are only a few things that matter in a supercar: looks, performance, sound, and feel. Quite frankly, it doesn't matter whether it gets 5 or 50mpg, has or has not have a boot, etc... And I didn't say that supercars shouldn't be about progress in technology. I'm expressing my disappointment in the fact that Ferrari's replacement for the Enzo is going to be a hybrid V8, rather than the V12 that it should be. I also vote for progress, but progress in performance not in public approval. The way I see it, this is progress for public approval, not performance. I think everyone here would agree that if it were up to Ferrari, the replacement would have a gas guzzling V12. I'll bet that Ferrari feels the same way. To quote dmanero, "Hybrids have no business in supercars or exotics." Could not have said it better myself.
September 9, 2010 2:43 pm
 IpsesNipse IpsesNipse
hmmmm, Whats wrong with hybrid supercars? You get awesome torque from zero revs that is 100% controllable by comuters and a turboish boost that you only get from like a bunch turbos and superchargers for rest of revs. Ferrari has always been about the latest tech, magnetic suspension, hyper fast transmission, good ESP's and driving control units. How can you say ferrari should be about oldschool racetech? Ferrari has never been like it. As soon as they can get hands on something that improves performance they take it. Look at the 599XX with fans that create downforce etc.
September 9, 2010 5:03 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
There is nothing technically wrong with hybrid supercars. If I were to own a Ferrari, the last thing I would think about is green eco whatever... It just seems to bastardize the experience. I'm all for having a variant that is a hybrid, but to build a car that would define the brand for the next decade and have it be a hybrid in my opinion is just not Ferrari. Furthermore, in response to your comment about the 599XX, every single piece on that machine was designed to make it go faster. Not a single bit of it was compromised. When buying what is supposed to be the ultimate Ferrari, I would expect that every last effort would be spent on making the car as good as it could be, and not, quite frankly, wasted on making it more economical, especially because they were pressured (well forced, really) to do so. Also, you seem to be misunderstanding what I was saying. In no way am I saying that Ferrari should be old school. That's what Aston Martin does, and they are the best at it.
September 9, 2010 6:07 pm
 Wickedated Wickedated
@dbehmoaras: I'm a Ferrari owner and enthusiast, and I know what you're saying. It's about the passion, the sound and the feel of a V12. An electric car will not give the same emotional experience, there's no doubt about that. However, two arguments: 1) Ferrari has always been about the latest tech, and even though it makes me cringe, they'll eventually phase out the combustion engine. I don't doubt that by 2025 all Ferraris will be a type of hybrid. But 2) You underestimate the power of an electric engine. If your argument against it is that for some reason, they'll suffer in performance you're wrong. I've driven the Tesla Roadster and the surge of torque takes 0 seconds, at any speed. No combustion engine can replicate that, save for a few hyperexotics. I think the next Enzo will probably have a normally aspired V8 coupled with an electric engine, and you could simply imagine the focus on performance- suppose a V8 churning out 500hp+ (like the Italia's) and an electric motor churning out 150hp. The effect on performance would be biblical. We might be talking about cars that do 0-60 in mid 2 seconds and quarter miles in low 9s.
September 10, 2010 4:26 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Thanks for the insightful comment. You're right, my argument stems from the passion that defines, or should define, Ferrari more than anything else. I'm sure that if anyone can make it work it's Ferrari, but I feel that in doing so they will lose the emotional appeal that should be in all Ferraris. That's why I have always liked them. I'm sure there is a lot to be had from electric power, as the shown by the Tesla which is a monster of a machine for what it is. I'm not necessarily arguing that it will result in a loss of performance, because Porsche has shown in the 918 that stellar performance is possible. I just feel that in going hybrid Ferrari will lose some of its soul, which is what makes it really special. In my opinion, the performance is not the only thing that matters in a supercar. I like to think that is the reason why people are very particular when deciding on a supercar. If it was solely about performance, anyone who didn't bought something else instead of a 458 Italia or a 911 GT3RS mk.2 in the past 6 months made a terrible mistake. You know what I mean? That explains why I would take a DBS over anything else in today's market. Not the fastest, not the best performance, but it has something else that I don't think any other car has.
September 12, 2010 12:58 pm
 mikemikemikemike mikemikemikemike
There is no way in hell that the Enzo successor will be hybrid. If so, the designers at ferrari have gone mad. I cannot imagine any ferrari driver wanting increased gas mileage. Why is there so much talk about hybrid supercars?
September 9, 2010 11:17 am
 Asger Asger
Because if they don't, governments won't allow the companies to produce them. I know we're speaking about Italy and Ferrari here, but things like CAFE are becoming more and more important in politics and the automotive industry.
September 9, 2010 11:27 am
 mikemikemikemike mikemikemikemike
I think ferrari guys would be more likely to put that stupid decal of the arm pointing forward from the fast and the furious on the side of their car than to get a hybrid.
September 9, 2010 11:19 am
 PONTIAC G8 GXP PONTIAC G8 GXP
Ferrari is very conservative company, its clients won't estimate this technical revolution. Ferrari cares about environment? Power would be provided by V8 biturbo-engine, but not hybrid, because with it Enzo will be too heavy. Hybrid California or 612 successor are much real, than ultrafast hypercar such as Enzo
September 9, 2010 11:56 am
 Francois Francois
It's only a couple of hundred exemplares, so it doesn't have to be developed with hybrid technology. Anyway I have full faith that Ferrari is going to make it properly, that all the petrolheads will be staggered.
September 9, 2010 12:24 pm
 dmanero dmanero
I said it then and I say it again. Hybrids have no business in supercars or exotics. Ok yes the new Porsche looks amazing, but seriously. How it going to look. your at the red light a cute woman walks by and you rev the engine. hell shes going to laugh at you, case all she's going to hear is a high pitching humming rather than a in your face growl. I'll take Twin turbo v10 and day.
September 9, 2010 12:55 pm
 IpsesNipse IpsesNipse
WTF are you talking about supercar hybrids arent the same as a prius the F...king electric motor is there to help out just like a turbo, dont be ignorant jus cause you think your oldschool an cool. It'll rev just as brilliantly as any other V8 it just has more torque. Have you seen the video with the 918 driving, the sound is awesome. they can make a fully racing engine that wont get as restraind cause it wont have to work as hard in a production car.
September 9, 2010 5:15 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
@ dmanero , the V8 in the Porsche 918 sounds great.
September 10, 2010 4:14 am
 DearS DearS
If they pair the 458 engine with a powerful electric motor (200hp), They could have a 760hp monster. Then agian I'm not sure it will handle as well as the 458.
September 9, 2010 1:52 pm
 M! M!
why do people have such negativity or stigma against the word "Hybrid"? the 918 and this enzo successor ain't no econobox. Whatever they put in, the electric motor and charging systems, have merits on their own that compliments the gasoline engine & drivetrain. All i care is the overall performance, and the 918 demonstrated that it is better than a Carrera GT, and I am confident ferrari can do much better than the Enzo ( as their 458 already did).
September 9, 2010 5:34 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
The 918 is most certainly an econobox. 78mpg??? It just happens to have 720bhp. In fact, that's its saving grace. I would still take a Carrera GT any day.
September 9, 2010 6:09 pm
 H3LUX H3LUX
Honestly this is all rubbish. why does a ferrari enzo replacement need fuel economy? are you going to go shopping with it? its something you may ride once a week if not a month at a track or something. fuel economy is not a matter. same bullshit porsche gave the 918.
September 9, 2010 8:45 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Exactly. Fuel economy does not belong in the replacement for the Enzo.
September 10, 2010 9:29 am
 clash_189 clash_189
Then think if Ferrari goes to make V8 bi-turbo 700hp and less weight that Enzo, while it will also be added with just 40kg KERS system that boost 200/148kw? Ok, that is twice as the 599 Hy-Kers, but it's Ferrari and I believe they can do it. Please grow up, man lives to beat any challenge and we also can beat this challenge. Wonder with the sound? Government recently has prepared to create rule in which on EV mode, any vehicle should have its engine moan and yeah, bring the V12 sound in this hyper-car. Job done
September 10, 2010 3:55 am
 GTurbo GTurbo
Guys, you all need to wake up and smell the coffee! If Porsche can adapt to modern alternative engineering standards, why not Ferrari? This has been an imminent reality as of a decade ago! I should know; my university dissertation was based on alternative engines and environmental concerns ten years ago! The Panamera, though as ugly as sin, has a hybrid engine remember? The fact Jaguar has diesel engines today is testament to business survival strategies needed nowadays by successful automakers which, in turn, brings about inevitable controversies. That's the way the cookie crumbles; not ideal for a Prancing Horse, but necessary to remain a global leader in sports car engineering.
September 10, 2010 9:36 am
 clash_189 clash_189
exactly, very good point
September 10, 2010 9:51 am
 HEMI426 HEMI426
A much better solution would to let it run on ethanol.
September 10, 2010 12:52 pm
 Edison Edison
First Porsche and then Ferrari will prove the naysayers wrong. I am almost certain the 918 and the Enzo successor will be epic.
September 10, 2010 2:47 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
No doubt about it. But you have to admit something else is lost by becoming a hybrid.
September 12, 2010 1:03 pm