GM aiming to match the quality of Audi interiors
We hope they succeed
While GM interiors are getting better, the company knows they still have more work to do.
Speaking with InsideLine, GM's Vice President of Global Engineering, Karl Stracke, stated "We're not yet at Audi quality. I want to be at Audi quality. Audi is the benchmark for interiors." He added, "I've driven the Corvette Grand Sport and I like it a lot, but the interior is not convincing." An honest statement considering the Corvette interior is synonymous with black plastic blah.
No word on when to expect major improvements, but GM has recently started a program which allows engineering executives to test competitor's products every Friday at the Milford Proving Grounds.
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (59)
why would GM do that??? this move requires very large investments, GM market is based on U.S. and for such moves is no need...they can just refresh the concept but to raise the high level of quality is a risky move...
May 28, 2010 7:46 am
I can attest to they need to up their products. I've owned GM for years except two Fords, and based on the problems with our car now, I'm going back to Ford or look at Dodge. My wife had a mitsubishi, and with all the high costs for parts will never buy foreign again.
May 29, 2010 1:53 pm
looks like Audi is now favorite, more and more companys tray match them.... good to hear that :)
May 28, 2010 7:58 am
thank god. Its about time an American car company realized that their interiors looked like crap. Hopefully others will fallow suit.
May 28, 2010 8:10 am
but, the point is, can GM make their interior like Audi quality but without the price premium? that's more important. i believe all auto manufacturers can build a car with all top-notch quality materials if they can set the price freely. people these days complain lots of cars with cheap interior, it's because they need to cut cost & keep the price down! want top quality materials? yeah, pay the price please...
May 28, 2010 3:03 pm
That's near impossible to happen!! Audi is way tooo classy for GM or such...
May 28, 2010 8:15 am
I've seen leather shoes that have nicer quality. It's not rocket science to stitch a nice leather interior. I'm sure they can handle the task. The only obstacle is going to be keeping cost down. I think I saw somewhere that it takes 7 full cow hides to make a single Porsche 911. That stuff gets expensive.
May 28, 2010 10:20 am
... and that's the cheapest commercial a car manufacturer can ever get... it's like Nokia will say that they will try to be as good as Sony Ericsson (not necessarily in that order)... ha, ha
May 28, 2010 12:54 pm
@freeway.... get ur acts 2gthr kid... nokia has always been better thn sony errr... I donno what world u live in...
May 29, 2010 2:11 am
Audi interiors are way over rated, they too are loaded to the brim with cheap plastic and usually consist of a boring monotone grey.
May 28, 2010 8:19 am
Aw Joe we all know that you're just very bitter at the fact that GM finally has found some balls to acknowledge their horrible interiors. Plastic in Audi interiors, yes some plastic, every interior has some plastic, but Audi interiors are functional, clean and visually pleasing. But a fool like you wouldn't know.
May 28, 2010 8:46 am
Hey joe, when they say industry standard they mean panel gaps and extruded textures...
May 28, 2010 3:54 pm
U ever even owned and Audi? There is a reason they have been #1 in interior design for years. Only a retard would need a 3" knob to turn the heater up.
May 29, 2010 6:19 pm
I almost bought a camaro. I even rented one for a whole day, but I could not stand looking at the cheap interior for a few years. Too much hard plastic.
May 28, 2010 8:22 am
Aaaaaa , not in a shazillion years . Maybe Audi will lower the standard so that GM could try and equal it , but seriously no chance . Just wait and see , the improvements will be minor . A piece of wood there , some aluminium on the dash , but no matter , in 3 months time they will fall off in a spectacular fashion .
May 28, 2010 9:02 am
Recent Audi cars have flimpsy plasticky buttons and hard scratchable plastic materials. The buttons on the A4 is bad, power window buttons, the door grips aren't solid as they used to be. It feels cheap compared to the previous A4. One of the ways to judge the quality of a car is the doorshut. Audi cars these days really dissapoint me. Porsche on the otherhand has been very consistent with its build quality. Mercedes has made agreat improvement with the latest W212 E-Class. I have yet to sit in the new A8 though.
May 28, 2010 9:02 am
@nederinaa In some respects you are right, but they have increased the content and quality elsewhere so something has to give. They may not be as tactile as in the past but from personal experience are equally as durable and class leading. I think it is only noticeable on their largest volume cars A3 and A4. From the S4 onward they rule.
May 28, 2010 9:29 am
Mate sorry I own a B8 A4, and have owned a B7 A4 previously. There is no difference in quality.
Neither is there any difference in quality between the A4 and S4 interiors.
May 28, 2010 10:50 am
you can't be serious? i've driven both B7 A4 2.0T quattro and the B8 A4 2.0T quattro. The B7 feels more solid and the materials is more rubbery with greater soft plastic texture. Compare the quality of today's TT and the original TT. I rest my case.
May 28, 2010 12:05 pm
Driving cars is one thing. Living with them day to day is another. The B8 has many flaws relative to the B7, the B7 has many more flaws relative to the B8. There is nothing between the finish of the interiors. Ergonomics and comfort in the drivers seat, well the B8 is ahead..... marginally. It's a more succinct experience from the drivers position.
May 28, 2010 12:49 pm
i'm going to have to agree with limon and nederinaa on this one. i've had two a4s in the shop recently, a b6 and a b7, and am not very impressed by the quality. i think audi's best interiors are on the a6 and the a8. these a4s don't even have adjustable electric seats (i guess that's an option) and the dash is a solid piece of plastic with buttons that are, imho, a bit too small. overall it gives me more of a synthetic feel. also, the cupholders feel really flimsy. the new c-class, (hell, even the previous iteration) are much nicer places to be than this. with m-b picking up its build quality in the 212 i think they'll be the marque to beat again. the 221 s-class has the nicest and most ergonomically designed interior on the market right now. good solid materials, few buttons, and everything within reach. the new 5 is supposed to be good too, they tilted the dash 7 degrees to the right to make everything easier for the driver to reach.
May 29, 2010 3:10 pm
About time GM realizes their interior sucks, well in most of the cars. But matching it to Audi standards, I don't see it happening honestly.
May 28, 2010 9:30 am
Has anybody driven in any of these luxury Euro cars after they have over 150,000 miles and at least 10 years of wear on them. I work exclusively on European automobiles and every single one of them after a few years starts to smell like a sick, dead, German cow. The fancy wood trim starts to crack and the chrome pot metal door handles and shifter trim starts to flake. When crome starts to flake it's as sharp as a razor blade, I've had numerous customers and fellow employees get pretty serious cuts from this stuff. The leather seats start to sag and wrinkle like an 80 year old, over tanned, smoking lady's tits. My cheap plastic interior on my Chevy after 10 years and 198,000 miles still looks just as cheap and plastic as the day I bought it, no rattles, NO SMELL.
May 28, 2010 10:15 am
How many sick, dead, German cows have you gone around smelling for that comparison? And what is wrong with you for doing so??
When speaking of GM's desire to match Audi's interior's - Well sure, I'd like to have Dirk Diggler's...personality, but it isn't in the cards for some folks to be above and beyond, as Audi is to GM. Lofty goals, GM, I hope you make it!
May 28, 2010 10:21 am
I've never met Mr Diggler, but I think your right he probably is a cool guy.
May 28, 2010 10:24 am
You must be very used to being around "an 80 year old, over tanned, smoking lady's tits" and "a sick, dead, German cow". And there's you talking about class and hygiene and whatever. Unfortunately its you who doesn't have any class and sophistication to appreciate the subtle elegance of European cars. Honestly how many people keep the same car for 150,000 miles nowadays.
May 28, 2010 11:16 am
Subtle elegance..... I never said the interiors are not nice, they are spectacular I drive them everyday. I'm at work right now... it's a slow friday so I'm on the computer don't tell my boss. Anyway like 45 minutes ago I just drove a new 212 E63 AMG and anybody who says that car is ugly is just wrong. We had 5 SLS's last week come in for Pre-deliver inspection and they are phenominal. I keep my cars for as long as they drive, so do alot of people I know. Buying new cars when it's not necessary I feel is a waste of money... some hippies might even think it's environmentally irresponsible. My truck is a tool I use, just like all the tools in my box, I expect it to last a long time and do it's job flawlessly. And it ages nicely compared to the leather/wood clad cars I fix every day.
May 28, 2010 11:33 am
I'd rather have a 10 year old car with leather interior than the conventional fabrics on cheaper cars. The fabrics stink at that age and you can not get the smell out.
Some people have cars for utility usage (ie: as a tool). Fortunately a lot of people treat them as toys (and or phallic extensions). Without the latter there wouldn't be as much joy to be had from interesting/different cars that are produced.
May 28, 2010 12:03 pm
Holding my tongue.... I will speak through my teeth as I try to be polite. You missed the point, you simply reversed my statement that I made regarding leather interiors. The truth is a lot of people in America use their cars as tools. I have a truck that I do use as a tool. The interior can be cleaned with a wet rag and look brand new. My fabric doesn't smell, as a matter of fact a car usually smells like the person who drives it most often so if any of your past cars had a bad smell in the fabric, look in the mirror... It's called soap and hot water, you should try it. If you must have a "phallic extender" then buy one, let it sit in your garage for special occasions. Take it out and use it on your first dates as false advertising just so she can be dissapointed a few weeks down the road.
May 28, 2010 1:28 pm
Hey benchmark, as a fellow Euro-tech I can attest to the pungent aromas from old euro cars. The leathers and plastics can (not "do") give off a rather distinct aroma as they age (to put it politely). However, you've neglected the most important variable in the whole problem. Maintenance. Unlike the cheap plastics in your Chevy, the organic materials in luxury cars must be maintained regularly. Leathers (and some plastics) must be conditioned every season, and the wood veneers must be cleaned and oiled constantly (not armor-alled) to avoid fractures. The chemicals used for maintenance are just-as (if not more) important than the materials being maintained themselves. However, I assume you know, as well as I, that practically ZERO owners do any of these things, and the net result is what you've so eloquently described above...
May 28, 2010 3:52 pm
100% Correct. Sometimes the steering wheels are so dirty I have to wear gloves to drive them.
May 28, 2010 5:22 pm
Totally agree with Benz_man. Only hope previous GM buyer knows how to do regular maintenance and do not treat their new GM with Audi's interior taste like what they do to their old GM. Maybe they will forget to clean the upper interior with soft cloth and special liquid and not with water.
May 28, 2010 6:38 pm
I think if they're going to shoot for an interior standard, then Audi is the best choice for them. Audi's interior design, finish, makes them just about the nicest cockpits to sit in. There are many nearly as good but very few as good. None do it as good across such a wide range of vehicles.
May 28, 2010 10:52 am
Do not include the MERCEDES in this story, they are a class of it's own !!! audi is just luxury WV
May 28, 2010 11:42 am
hehe :))) benchmark I like your answer very much, and I fear that there could be conflicts if the we checked against German cars...
May 28, 2010 11:57 am
Finally GM! Now nobody will be able to slam cars like the ZR1 which is a world beater on and off the track but still has a less than desireable interior which is the only thing anyone can really knock it for!!!
May 28, 2010 12:01 pm
What is wrong with these people? GM admitting the quality of the interior of their luxury brand is sub-par will certainly lose customers. What does that say for the remaining GM vehicles and brands ( or lack there of ). Hence, why Oldsmobile, Pontiac and Saturn no longer exist. Why not improve the quality first then boast about it and show how far you've come.
May 28, 2010 12:45 pm
No it won't. People who buy Cadillac or Chevrolet aren't suddenly going to flock to BMW or VW because of a statement. You would have to be missing a chromosome to not realise that the interior finish of GM's cars are behind the quality of premium manufacturers. Oldsmobile, Pontiac, and Saturn don't exist because there was absolutely no reason for them to exist. What value or individuality did they provide? Nothing. It's a no brainer to consolidate GM's range in North America to Chevrolet, Cadillac, and of course Corvette. Look for Buick to disappear first from NA, shortly followed by GMC. I hope the door doesn't hit them on their way out.
May 28, 2010 12:58 pm
I guess it's a case of survival of the fittest. Or, in this case Fit & Finish.
May 28, 2010 1:18 pm
Audi really has some of the cleanest designs on the market, inside and out. The only annoyance I can think of is an overabundance of buttons on older Audis.
May 28, 2010 10:04 pm
read "clean" as "boring." when they start changing their exterior designs instead of producing one car in different size wheelbases, then maybe i'll pay attention.
May 29, 2010 3:13 pm
A more refined interior would probably be optional, or only available on premium trims. The figures to be paid for mass producing Audi-like interior would be mind-boggling.
May 28, 2010 11:23 pm
I think the executive engineers should be given 15 and 20 years old corollas, civics, accords and camrys for a year and then a 5 or 10 yrs old sedan GM model of their choice to compare how a car can sustain ten plus years of day to day use and still perform up to par in all its electrical and mechanical components.
May 29, 2010 7:38 am










