GM, Chrysler set for More Government Loans

 GM, Chrysler set for More Government Loans
More government money heads to GM & Chrysler

$23 billion combined

Chrysler Group LLC and General Motors Co. are seeking a combined $23 billion in loans from the U.S. Department of Energy for renovating factories.  If approved, the loans would come from a $25 billion fund set up in 2008, and would carry a lower rate of interest than loans already provided by the U.S. Government.

GM's request of $14.4 billion and Chrysler's application for $8.55 billion have passed the several hurdles required by the loan programme.  The purpose of the loans is to spur development of fuel efficient vehicles that use at least 25% less fuel than similar sized models, and companies must prove that the loans will be used to that end.

"It's a really a process of making sure that each of the projects that they have are in fact competitive," Energy Dept. adviser Matt Rogers reportedly said.  "Now that we have clear financial statements, we're actually working quite aggressively with them and expect to get some results there shortly,"

Thus far, $9 billion has been handed out from the programme.  Over 100 different companies have applied for a combined total of $42.7 billion.  Amongst those companies are Ford Motor Co., which took $5.9 billion after initially requesting $11 billion.  Nissan, Fisker and Tesla have each received their share, respectively taking $1.6 billion, $529 million, and $465 million.  The loans were handed out on a 25-year payback plan

Financing may be used either to build or renew factories, or directly for the production of parts and vehicles.

Source: Detroit News

Add a Comment

Comments (11)

Subscribe to comments
 dmanero dmanero
I thought GM was already paying off it's loans. And that they were expecting a profit in the near future.
May 14, 2010 8:45 am
 Jo@Switzer Jo@Switzer
They didn't specify WHICH loans ... keep in mind: after bankruptcy, there were literally BILLIONS in loans and debts that GM didn't have to pay off anymore.
May 14, 2010 11:12 am
 jimbotron jimbotron
Yeah. Wasn't Witcare bragging in a commercial about how much better GM is, and how they payed all their loans back early? Well I guess they're good for it.
May 14, 2010 9:16 am
 Iconic Iconic
It doesn't really matter if they are profitable or not. All companies operate with the help of loans.. whether they be private of government. Why would they turn down a shot at cheap government loans. They're margins will be higher and it will be easier to pay it back.
May 14, 2010 10:53 am
 jerry05cod4 jerry05cod4
the magic of leverage when your company is profitable!
May 14, 2010 2:06 pm
 THEBENCHMARK THEBENCHMARK
READ THE ARTICLE!!! These loans are government incentives to spur the development of fuel efficient vehicles. This has nothing to do with the GM/Chrysler bailout. If you read it also states that Tesla, Nissan and other companies are using these loans as well. Kind of like a stimulus package. Shame on WCF for using the headline they did. They love negative publicity, so much so they have to fabricate new gossip. They must have realized that at least 90% of the readers on this site will not read the article and just make assumptions based on the comment in the headline. Thanks Iconic for knowing what's going on.
May 14, 2010 1:51 pm
 zmnewmark zmnewmark
Your concern is valid, but you do not mention one critical point: the headline is 100% accurate. One of the conditions of the new loan is to prove that the company making the application has a strong possibility of still being alive for the entire 25-year of the loan. There are many who would argue that GM and Chrysler, who have an enormous outstanding debt, are endangered corporations that should not be entitled to more loans from a government body.
May 15, 2010 1:56 pm
 Intense Intense
So much money ... would have been great to invest that much in research for a better transportation solution that the conventional polluting gasoline engine, no ? I love cars, and I surf this website on a weekly basis .. I am starting to realize slowly that gasoline engines are not the best transportation method that the genius brain of a man can invent, man can definitely do better ... ah well .. until then ... I'll enjoy the fun I get from driving a gasoline engine.
May 15, 2010 5:20 pm
 yas609 yas609
You know what really sucks is that i work at a dealership that has a Chevrolet dealer in the automall and the saddest part is Chevy has some really nice cars now like the Equinox . I was so impressed when I first saw it, but they can't even supply them to the dealers. They have customers looking for them all the time but end up purchasing a different brand because they only have one or two in stock.
May 15, 2010 8:14 pm
 LeroisF40 LeroisF40
The question I have is Why does GM get almost three times as much as Ford, Ford was granted $5.9B after requesting $11B. Ford was able to make due with less because the government in charge of distrubution of the loans felt they did not warrant the amount they requested. Why now does a company that was unable to ensure their own profitability through Fiscally sound managing get to write off large sums of tax payer grants have the gift of three times as much as a company that has managed itself well through the economic downturn? This sounds more like the typical over spending of government on projects that are going to cost a fortune yet return pennies. Government Motors will just do this for the near forseable future and the media will dress it up and tell you that the spending is justified for the Bla Bla Bla!!!!!
May 17, 2010 3:48 am
 LeroisF40 LeroisF40
And while I am on my rant, what about Chrysler getting about 40% more than Ford! The damn company was bought out by a foriegn car manufaturer and the US tax payer is still going to fund it and its disasturous failures in both product and managment roles. When are the American people going to wake up and just walk away from these companies, cut your losses now and just let the dying beast die.
May 17, 2010 3:59 am