GP2 cars on Senna's pace in sunny Bahrain

 GP2 cars on Sennas pace in sunny Bahrain
Bruno Senna (BRA), Hispania Racing F1 Team - Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 1, Bahrain Grand Prix, Friday Practice / Copyright: Batchelor / xpb.cc

Commentators for GP2 qualifying in Bahrain on Saturday were keeping a close eye on the laptime 2m7s.

The reason was that the junior racers were tantalisingly close to eclipsing the best time set by F1 rookie Bruno Senna in the second Friday practice session.

Before a mechanical problem ended his shakedown in the HRT, whose Italian constructor Dallara also makes the GP2 cars, he was circulating an immense 12 seconds off the pace -- 5 seconds behind the next-slowest Virgin cars.

There are rumours that F1 will soon revive the 107 per cent qualifying rule, in which case the new Spanish team could be in trouble.

Senna's rookie teammate Karun Chandhok failed to make it onto the track at all throughout Friday's 180 minutes of practice.

"We can't seem to get the clutch and gearbox working the right way," said the Indian.

Having a better day on Friday was Mercedes GP, whose Nico Rosberg topped the afternoon timesheet. In both sessions, Michael Schumacher was not as fast as the sister W01.

Asked if the car is ready to win races, test driver Nick Heidfeld told Germany's Sky: "It's hard to say yet, even if it is our goal for the season.

"Whether we can do it from the outset, I think we will find out on Saturday afternoon," said the German.

Force India's Adrian Sutil had been the morning's fastest, but he too was cautious: "Only after two or three races will we know where we really stand."

 

Add a Comment

Comments (1)

Subscribe to comments
 astroturf777 astroturf777
so - if they can change gears - hrt will be lapped twice by virgin, and 6 times by the winning team? we may see many records broken. they're 4 seconds per lap off the 107% rule that should have been brought back this year. why allow budget teams to return to the grid and overlook the rule that was always around before the crap teams got good. it's been a few years since 107% meant anything but it does now. what was the reason for the rule when first introduced? was it safety, demand for realistic results? not wanting 'eddie the eagle' sideshows? why not enter a fiat panda, strip it down to be within specs and get lapped 40 times - with big sponsor logos all over it of course - hey it wouldnt even cost the 40 million euros HRT spend, sell ad space and make a profit.
March 12, 2010 5:40 pm