2011 Volvo S60 Detailed Prior to Geneva Debut [Video]

Add a Comment

Comments (23)

 peterjames7 peterjames7
like it, but wat is going on with the interior that screen with the vent on the side and the dash surface looks cheap even in the photos, such a shame really....
February 9, 2010 7:08 pm
 Jeremiah Clarksonius Jeremiah Clarksonius
I agree on that... It does look cheap... Is Volvo turning Tata-ish? In my opinion, the interior of any car is more important than its exterior styling, after all is where we spend most of our time when driving the thing...
February 9, 2010 9:19 pm
 effington effington
you only spend "most" of your time driving from the interior of a car? my god you are talented! i have to agree though... they should have put a little bit more effort into this. nice enough however!
February 9, 2010 9:39 pm
 keithxp keithxp
usually interiors trickle from the top models down... looks like the interior from the s40. Give me back the s70 and 850 :(
February 9, 2010 9:54 pm
 GRAVE GRAVE
Everything is nice except the rear lights
February 9, 2010 7:08 pm
 X6M X6M
Don't like it, especially rear end.
February 9, 2010 7:16 pm
 kalle_Karlstrom kalle_Karlstrom
The enterior looks like any other Volvo, cheap and loads of plasticy finishes. The seats are outdated and if they are standard Volvo seats, not even very nice to sit in. The whole car just looks Korean. No offence. Just as all volvos, they try too hard.
February 9, 2010 7:45 pm
 need4speed need4speed
that singular vent on the main dash (not the one adjacent to the navi) looks quite odd. The design influence must have came from the mythical cyclops. Does anyone else "see" that?
February 9, 2010 8:05 pm
 pscs pscs
I know! they're fitting the navigation screen lower (as opposed to a pop-up), which squeezes everything down lower and have these weirdest aircon vents. the buttons below that seems difficult to reach as a result. bad design.
February 9, 2010 9:16 pm
 Grey Grey
beautiful inside and out except that weird center console. what is up with the weird vents?! the profile look abit too much like a civic sedan, not entirely a bad thing i think the civic sedan looks awesome too. it will be a hot seller despite what these whiney internet haters (who are probably pre-driver license teenagers) have to say.
February 9, 2010 8:17 pm
 kimbo kimbo
Interior looks cheap, old and cold, definately not a nice place to sit in - but that's only from seeing photos - it can be possibly better in real life. I really like the front - it's still volvo, but much more modern. The side profile and rear end, on the other hand, are awful and all wrong. I am amazed how so many people (from designers to bosses) agreed that this is good looking. It just isn't. But I'd like to test drive it.
February 9, 2010 8:20 pm
 pscs pscs
yeah... it's these people that churn out distasteful stuff and claim that these design language symbolises some made up cr4p. dunno how it's always these people that get the job.
February 9, 2010 9:11 pm
 pscs pscs
the navigation screen doesn't seem to be well-positioned -- putting the aircon vents in weird positions and the numerous buttons low down. the current s60's popup screen is way better.
February 9, 2010 9:09 pm
 MTC MTC
the Volvo's XC60 interior is just beautiful, this just isn't as good as the one in the XC60
February 9, 2010 9:10 pm
 nederina nederina
If it is not because of the bright orange unvolvo paint, it might just look dated. I miss the classy, clean evergreen soft lines of Scandinavian design on the previous S60. I don't understand why car designers these days design aggressive looking cars that goes dated very quickly. From the safety point of view, it is great to see that Volvo has taken such developments to make the road a safer place. Back to the design, what a missed opportunity after the XC60.
February 9, 2010 10:16 pm
 Alfafox5 Alfafox5
I agree. Volvo is chasing too many 'trends' at once.
February 10, 2010 1:48 am
 Mike.F1 Mike.F1
I'm sorry but this car is just plain UGLY This surpasses the 5-series GT in terms of "What were they thinking?"
February 9, 2010 11:25 pm
 Alfafox5 Alfafox5
This is interesting... not in the best way. The elegance and symmetry that graces the current S80 did not make it to this new S60. Profile: Strange 'wave' surface recalls Bangal-era BMW woes. Nose: Pedestrian safety laws ruin another nose, even with those *nifty* marker lights left and right of the grill can't hide the length. Enough with these stupid madates! Getting hit by a car is never a good thing; leave the designers alone, it's not like we're sticking giant ornaments on the hood anymore. Sheesh! Interior: They abandoned the slick hide-away-navi for s stupid Audi/Merc Microwave-in-dash unit! Why!? The cyclops vent alone might have worked... but the tension caused by the random shapes of (1) the vent to the right of the navi, (2) the key slot and button to the left all add up to a messy arrangement. Rear: I personally find the taillights to be a well-sculpted element, framing the trunk, building out the mock-spoiler, giving the rear 3/4 angle a solid appearance. Calls that it looks like a Civic do resonate. Not my favorite soap-bar of a car, but it does have a low Cd. In this case, I wish they had given it class-leading rear leg room, or perhaps crafted something more elegant. This looks far too down-market to make me choose it over a 3-series. At least with the 3-series I can opt-out of that hideous navi stuffed into the dash. So close, a sad miss; as Volvo chases trendy style, it's losing what made it great. Last crafted in the S80, strong lines, moderate pricing, and a safe car that was luxurious without being flashy. I think they would have gotten more attention if they suddenly came out with a car like the Subaru XT-6, it still has one of the lowest Cd.'s while being full of hard angles. Who knew square could cheat the wind so well. Considering my rant, I wish Volvo all the best, but I think I seek out my quirky brand needs from the future Saab.
February 10, 2010 1:45 am
 tomaaurelian tomaaurelian
jeg
February 10, 2010 5:37 am
 3MOCIONA 3MOCIONA
Volvo are becoming over-styled, the front would be better simpler.The dashboard design is ruined by the placement of the sat nav and the vents. The overall design is not bad but the dash ruins it for me and for that reason, i wouldn't buy it.
February 10, 2010 10:59 am
 xLumino xLumino
like it. exspecially the rear and the proportions overall the interiour is great. it looks lightly
February 10, 2010 1:15 pm
 HEMI426 HEMI426
The old one looked better and also had better proportions
February 14, 2010 5:14 pm
 mroctober mroctober
Hot. An attractive none-B sedan that I think is eye-catching in a while. Would seriously consider buying. An R version would be a done deal.
September 3, 2010 10:24 am