G-POWER X5 M and X6 M TYPHOON with 600hp Announced
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (17)
Why do this?
Just buy a M5 G-Power.
They destroyed the car's already crap off-road performance making it an asphalt-only sissy. Can't BMW make a sort of Cayenne Turbo S (that retains its competetive offroad spirit)
the X6M G-Power is ugly as fuck, this X5 is bearable but the previous G-Power X5 was ugly too.
December 11, 2009 6:56 pm
let me guess... u heard this argument on top gear and now you're repeating it.
December 11, 2009 7:19 pm
If they were music they would look like Susan Boyle and perform like aerosmith. Two worst looking Beemers.
December 11, 2009 7:29 pm
This one looks best if they were to run it to top speed, then hit a wall (preferably with the designers present so they can see their "masterpieces" in their best appearance - wrecked on the garbage truck). Who knows, they might actually get the idea that their trucks looks like crap and go back to the drawing board. The X6 makes as much sense as the new 5 series GT...
December 11, 2009 7:44 pm
looks god awful, what they do hit it with a hammer till they got tired and called it a body-kit.
December 11, 2009 7:47 pm
there has never been anything more pointless. whats the point?if you really badly want a beamer sports car you get a m5 or m6, not a useless bloated X6. its unpractical on the road, and i doubt it can even go on grass let alone offroad.
December 12, 2009 5:05 am
why is 99% of you against this car ? your not only after this bodykit, your even against the stock car ! wcf is a place for car enthusiasts and simply the way you are commenting is way too rude.... you have to understand there are soo many views to this point as it resembles a new and unique car segment... i am SURE no one has come close to try the x6 or the x5.... if so u will really understand how this car is configured.... yes the bodykit is funky and the x6 has too many rear spoilers... but both cars look fab from the front and have a great exaust tune from the back....also the x6 looks kinda good in that woody brown color
December 12, 2009 10:13 pm
OK so looking at it from multiple view points, style: it is ugly and most people agree on this. Practicality: None,it is an SUV that can't go off road. It also isn't practical as a people carrier since it only seats 5 instead of 7. It doesn't get good gas mileage. CO2 emissions are high so you pay more in taxes. It also doesn't have a huge trunk. The trunk is large but if your looking for a fast car that has a big trunk why not a sport wagon, its cheaper, carries more people. There is no practical segment for this vehicle.
December 12, 2009 11:05 pm
most people i know like the X6, but i live in Europe. also it's not a SUV , it's a SAV. it isn't supposed to have utility and go rock climbing or through deep mud. it's supposed to cover a niche, it's for people who want something special, not the ordinary cookie cutter vehicle. it's for people who might spend the weekends on gravel roads or go through snow in the winter , but also want something that's fun to drive on the highway and like the high driving position and the increased safety. the diesel X5 and X6 have good mileage.
December 14, 2009 9:02 am
None of you will understand the practicality until you actually drive it. Sort of like the m5 and m6. They are both the same performance and weight wise. The m5 has higher practicality.
December 13, 2009 3:57 am
in terms of looks it really doesnt give an impact, still looks ugly in my opinion. but as for performance why have 600bhp ? honestly, the petrol here in london is absolutely absured no point really.
December 14, 2009 11:07 am









