BMW M3 GTS Revealed [Video]

Press Release

Interview with Markus Schadow, BMW M aerodynamics development.

MPW: Mr. Schadow, the BMW M3 GTS has clearly visible dynamic measures with its front splitter and rear wing. The aerodynamics of the BMW M3 GTS is clear for all to see. Optimised for downforce. Why?

Schadow: The power which can be transferred from the contact area of the tyres to the road depends on tyre properties, the position of the tyre on the road - i.e. axle kinematics - and the wheel vertical force. Our measures are all about increasing the wheel vertical force. The higher the wheel vertical force, the higher the level of longitudinal and transverse acceleration which can be achieved.

MPW: An increase in vehicle weight would also increase wheel vertical force ...

Schadow: (laughs). That's certainly true. But more mass also generates greater forces of inertia and centrifugal forces. So this doesn't do any good. On the contrary: the tyre-specific maximum load is reached earlier on, and the longitudinal and transverse acceleration can only be raised to this point, since above this point grip is lost. So what is required is low weight combined with maximum wheel vertical force. Which is why we generate downforce. However, the measures to increase downforce also increase aerodynamic drag. This is why they are adjustable in their effect in the BMW M3 GTS.

MPW: At the front axle, the downforce is generated by means of a longitudinally adjustable front splitter ...

Schadow: Yes, we chose this solution so as to limit the everyday suitability of the vehicle as little as possible and have sufficient ground clearance in racing set-up on the Nordschleife.

MPW: How does the front splitter actually work?

Schadow: While the car is moving, the pressure which builds up in front of the vehicle above the panel of the front splitter which is parallel to the ground is much greater than in the free stream of air below it. This creates a downforce. The lift force which you get in the standard BMW M3 is thus turned around.

MPW: And why the impressive rear wing in the BMW M3 GTS?

Schadow: The rear axle has a very important role to play in terms of drive stability. In order to be able to achieve a high level of drive stability at high speeds, we need at least as much downforce on the rear axle as on the front axle - ideally it should be significantly higher.

MPW: Why don't you use a diffuser?

Schadow: A diffuser which would meet the space requirements here would be far less effective than the rear wing. We would never be able to reach a level of downforce required for a reasonable aerodynamic balance. This is also why in every racing series which allows the use of a rear wing, the cars are fitted with one. The rear wing of the BMW M3 GTS generates a high level of downforce and therefore drive stability.

So we can expect some good lap times?

(laughs). You're certainly in for a surprise!

Mr. Schadow, thank you for talking to us.

 


Add a Comment

Comments (73)

Subscribe to comments
 tumbo tumbo
Looks great! I hope Audi will do the same with the upcoming RS5!
November 4, 2009 7:35 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
they are working on a hardcore R8.
November 4, 2009 7:38 pm
 carbonfibreguy carbonfibreguy
what does audi and "working on a hardcore R8" have to do with this???
November 5, 2009 3:27 am
 scratchy996 scratchy996
it has something to do with swine flu.
November 5, 2009 7:10 am
 tumbo tumbo
What does Audi have to do with it? C'mon man, you have to be a car fan enough to know that Audi are BMW's hardest opponents, and the RS5 is the direct much to the M3.
November 5, 2009 11:18 am
 carbonfibreguy carbonfibreguy
I know that the RS5 is the direct match to the M3, but who gives about the R8 when talking about the M3? Thats like talking about the M3 and then saying "did you know that Audi is working on a R8???" lol
November 7, 2009 9:24 pm
 MTC MTC
No wonder they said they won't build a M3 CSL, but I'm glad they build this. not just glad, but really happy. Extremely
November 4, 2009 7:50 pm
 sub39h sub39h
the M3 CSL wasn't priced ?40k more than the standard M3. for the same money i'd prefer a nearly new S350 CDI and a Cayman with the change (for the track work, naturally).
November 4, 2009 9:54 pm
 jerry05cod4 jerry05cod4
the e46 m3 gtr was priced similarly... it was around 200k
November 4, 2009 10:21 pm
 Narco Narco
I love the way subby always says everything sucks...then proclaims his idea is sooooo much better when it actually is worse than what he is comparing to...like he is really taking his "cayman" to the track "naturally". Keep up the good work. Fishes, Narco.
November 5, 2009 1:32 pm
 N20_Purge N20_Purge
After all the SEMA crap, there is some very interesting news. the GTS is the new CSL with trackday mods, sweet!
November 4, 2009 7:54 pm
 radmeister radmeister
I guess it's how the question was asked, will you build a CSL...No. If bmw was asked will you build a more radical version of the M3 perhaps the answer would have been yes and we would of known about this from the start. I think it's pretty easy to see what car they are going after with this, name like GTS and painted in Porsche GT3 orange. Should be interesting to see it's ring time in comparison to the normal M3.
November 4, 2009 7:56 pm
 stillthewhizz stillthewhizz
They couldn't build a lightweight CSL because the current generation M3 already had weight saving measures on it. Therefore the only likely option was a more extreme M3, the equivalent of a 911 GT3 RS.
November 4, 2009 8:08 pm
 mldrieling mldrieling
Another great car that I want but can't afford. BMW, make a CSL version of the 1 series and give us an M version. That would be a car I'd be able to afford (and want).
November 4, 2009 8:21 pm
 MadeInGermany MadeInGermany
Beast!!! this thing will rape the GT3RS. It's BMW POWER It's ///M POWER
November 4, 2009 8:32 pm
 carbonfibreguy carbonfibreguy
lmao, id like to see that happen, although i doubt the M3 will beat a GT3RS...
November 5, 2009 3:28 am
 ADCAR ADCAR
it will not beat GT3 RS Neverrrrrrr
November 5, 2009 7:26 am
 carbonfibreguy carbonfibreguy
@ADCAR We'll see if theres ever a race between these two titans!!!
November 10, 2009 1:32 am
 catchmyshadow catchmyshadow
lol @ that rear wing :D
November 4, 2009 9:01 pm
 McNamara68 McNamara68
this is really cool, about damn time bmw took a break from building kiddie carriers. and i love the sound. i do, however, think it is way overpriced. i mean $170,000 for an M3 with modifications one could easily make with enough technical know how is just ridiculous. One could buy a Porsche GT3 for $50,000 less and the CLK63 Black was $40,000 less. This is a cool car, but a rip-off for the money. And please change that color, no one in their right mind wants an M3 painted like a caution cone.
November 4, 2009 9:21 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Its such a great car but the price is way too high, you hit it on the head, for once ;)
November 4, 2009 11:18 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
it won't cost $170k in the US , just like the GT3 RS which costs 145k Euros in Europe doesn't cost $205k in the US.
November 5, 2009 7:13 am
 McNamara68 McNamara68
I'm just quoting the article: "BMW will only manufacture the M3 GTS to order and sell it at about ?115,000 (US$170 614) per unit."
November 5, 2009 5:31 pm
 jerry05cod4 jerry05cod4
@MCNAMARA and everything written on this article is also written in stone? right? NOOOOOOOOTTTTT!! scratchy explained it clearly i thought
November 5, 2009 6:11 pm
 McNamara68 McNamara68
some of the idiots on this site never cease to amaze. the article's information, i assume perhaps incorrectly, is based on something other than a hunch. based on that, i think the car is overpriced. let's say it was $100,000, i would still think it is overpriced because i can get a normal M3 for that much, spend four days in my garage and come up with something that is almost identical. i guess, if you know nothing about the mechanics of an automobile, don't have the time (at least $40,000 worth of time), or simply don't care about money, then yeah go ahead and buy the damn thing. no one knows what it will cost. bottom line, i assume what these guys are writing has some basis in fact.
November 5, 2009 8:59 pm
 vilivo vilivo
I am not gonna be surprised if its true- the CSL was 2.5 times the price of a normal M3 here!I only have a problem with the notion it might be more expensive than the CLK Black, because it is nowhere nearly as different from the STD car to justify the price tag. In fact- the suggested price in the article is more than a Porsche GT3RS is here, and WAAAAY more than a Nissan GTR. Don get me wrong- I LOVE BMW, and I own a supercharged, track focussed M3, of the current gen. Done by Rob green - a BMW specialist in our country, and it way WAY less than this price, and is likely better than this one too. I think BMW is getting cheeky on their prices.
November 7, 2009 4:04 am
 Dr Alvar Hanso Dr Alvar Hanso
So, who wants to buy a kidney!? Anyone!?
November 4, 2009 9:33 pm
 Dr Alvar Hanso Dr Alvar Hanso
Oh, and BTW... the orange color with the black rims... Touch?, Pussy Cat! :D
November 4, 2009 9:36 pm
 otakki otakki
The text states 225/35 tires but the picture shows 255/35.
November 4, 2009 9:36 pm
 jerry05cod4 jerry05cod4
bmw never fails... yeeeesssss! looking forward to seeing this car's stats
November 4, 2009 10:31 pm
 Lennox.... Lennox....
wow really nice!! but honestly i dunno why they should still called the CSL i knwo BMW said no to it so we have to another decade to see the CSL again :\ but either way The GTS sounds nice and i agree with radmeister the 911 GT3 is the CSL or GTS competition. Now the question still remains which is gonna be faster around the ring? i still root for the BMW been an M3 since day one! :) lets go BMW M3 GTS!
November 4, 2009 10:38 pm
 M! M!
nice. glad they are not just making X5Ms. and why wasn't this unreveal at the ///M's anniversary? (instead of that one of M5). and that orange / black color scheme is so (old) GT3RS / exige. i prefer white with ///M tricolor stripes. and btw, there are so many other good cars at $170k USD.
November 4, 2009 10:47 pm
 bone91 bone91
I want one.
November 4, 2009 10:56 pm
 clash_189 clash_189
Isn't it just too hardcore and expensive than the current M3? It's already a M5 territory. However, if I already get M5 and still have another $170k to be spent, maybe it will be a difficult choice between this M3 GTS and 740d.
November 4, 2009 10:59 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Its hard to believe you'ld crossshop this beast with a PURE luxury sedan like the 740d. They are very different cars for very different purposes.
November 4, 2009 11:17 pm
 clash_189 clash_189
Xanavi, I know that I should be wrong. But after, you spend your money to buy a super salon, would you buy another one? I though, your partners or the rest in your house will not happy. We need yo combine, one for family and one for us. for me, I will choose either a M5 and 740 d or that beast M3 GTS and 740d. But I also know in many of our hearth, we will prefer to have both M cars.
November 6, 2009 9:57 am
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Well if you already have a saloon or sports car and are lucky enough to have a family then there's other things to consider of course. But even in your hypothetical case, your requirements choose the car. Dont get me wrong if you need a fast car(or quick) car but with some practicality then the M5 is a better choice of car. Nothing can replace the day to day hassle-free bonuses granted by a nice sedan. It all comes down to what you're looking for. Im a single guy but i wouldn't toss out a possible sedan. Especially one as good as the M5.
November 7, 2009 12:09 am
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Its over-priced but nevertheless this is a great car for BMW fans alike and motorfans period. This is the CSL that should have been made sooner. They should have tried for more power but with Natural Aspiration it probably would have put too much stress on the engine. All in all despite the high price.. VERY, very good car. I would like to see this run against the 911 GT3 though this car carries a disadvantage.
November 4, 2009 11:16 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Overpriced hmm perhaps when compared to what other cars can be bought for the same price, but the question is not about what else can you buy for the price it's is there another version of the M3 that is faster and more exclusive from the factory? The answer is no, look at for example the standard GT-R vs the Spec-V, there is a huge difference in price, even though you can get faster cars for less money you are buying the premium version of what is your favourite car. And owning the best of what you love is never cheap. Another 1 is the Lexus for it's ridiculous price. If you love lexus and you want the best i'm sorry but it will cost you. GT3 RS vs GT2 not that big of a difference in performance, but you pay a huge premium for having the top of the line exclusive of already a premium car. It's premium^2 so of course the price will reflect that. Also, that is a currency equivalent price in USD, the M6 coupe in France is 125,150eur and in the US it is 102,100$US. Which is a price difference of 83,650.11$ when you convert the currency. Which is like giving away an X5M on top of your M3. So you can expect this M3 to set you back 90-95k US.
November 5, 2009 12:18 am
 jerry05cod4 jerry05cod4
not sure if its the fastest but the m3 gtr is more exclusive...only 8 road-going versions where produced, though it was priced even higher than this one. Anyways, i would pay 170k for this one in a heartbeat.
November 5, 2009 1:31 am
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Thats a very good way of looking at it Radmeister. This is the fastest BMW in production despite not having the most power so the price becomes a bit more when you look at that way.
November 5, 2009 12:36 pm
 PawL PawL
I don't like the way the rear wing looks. The rims are gorgeous and they could have kept the air-con...but it's more of a race car, made for the pleasure of driving...it is suposed to get you sweat like a pig :)
November 5, 2009 12:21 am
 clash_189 clash_189
If you live in Australia and unfortunately it is during summer and the temperature is between 42 to 50 C, and driving such car without AC, then you will feel like a roast chicken.
November 6, 2009 10:09 am
view more comments