Porsche Panamera Cabriolet Rumours Surface

Porsche Panamera 2009

By Thami Masemola
October 9, 2009 6:44 PM
Filed Under: German, Porsche, Rumours

Porsche's four-door Panamera has only just started selling in countries like Germany and the UK but already there's talk of a topless Cabriolet. Rumours say the convertible will have two instead of four doors and cost about €11,000 (US$16,000) more than the sedan.

"We have a broad range of 14 derivatives of the 911 that are very successful," development chief Wolfgang Duerheimer told Automobilwoche. "So it stands to reason we should diversify the lineup for the Panamera as well."

New Porsche owners Volkswagen AG are keen to see the sports car maker increase its model range and thereby increasing its sales footprint. In addition, such an expensive platform as the Panamera's would have to pay for itself at some stage and spreading it around the group including to brands like Bentley and Audi would be good business.

While we are rolling on the speculative road why not bring up the previous rumour of a possible Panamera hard top Coupe? Logically it makes sense to build this variant as a match for a Cabriolet. It would also allow Porsche entry into the premium luxury GT segment occupied by current leaders like the Mercedes-Benz CL (tba S-Class Coupe) and the Aston Martin DBS.

 

Source: Autonews

Comments

sub39h
October 9, 2009 7:11 PM
and the 911 cabrio DOESN'T qualify as a high end GT?

usually cutting the roof off a car makes it uglier. if that's gonna be the case and considering the current level of ugliness the panamera has managed to achieve, should we all pluck our eyes out now?

sideskraper
October 9, 2009 7:42 PM
Correct. The 911 doesn't have the space to be a true Grand Tourer.

The Panamera will look much better in two door form, and smooth in cabriolet form. Rather than the big butt on the 911 cabriolet. Go look at the 924, 944, 928, 968, etc. Front engined GT porsches actually look stylish.


Edited by user on October 9, 2009 at 7:44 PM
dbehmoaras
October 9, 2009 8:09 PM
I agree. The 911 is not a grand tourer. Ideally, a grand tourer has similar dimensions to the DB9. The 911 is closest to the Benz CLK, right in between the roadster (SLK) and grand tourer (CL, soon to be S coupe).

sub39h
October 9, 2009 8:49 PM
i disagree with both those statements. the article compares a potential 2 door Panamera with the AM DBS, which is a 2 seater car. the 911 at least has 4 seats, even if the back ones aren't particularly useable.

cars like the C2S also compare with cars like the Jag XKR, which definitely does count as a GT car and doesn't have a pair of useable back seats either.

the CLK isn't close to the 911 in terms of size, price, stature or ability so i don't know how you've made that comparison. would you compare a 3 Series to a 911? because that's what you've essentially done.

i've seen 911s being used as cross country vehicles, and many of them are used to go to and from work on a daily basis. those are things that are generally done by GT cars.

sideskraper
October 10, 2009 7:06 AM
What are you on about? Just because a car has 4 seats doesn't make it a GT or not. I drive my Fiat as a daily driver and across country, by your logic it's a GT car. My Dad drives his Landcruiser daily and across country, is that a GT car?

I tried out a 911 but it didn't have enough usable space. I couldnt fit in a small suitcase and overnight bag into it. I can easily fit them in my XK. You can't do much touring if you can't bring a couple of changes of clothes for yourself and a passenger.

The 911 is not a GT car and Porsche agrees.

sub39h
October 10, 2009 8:25 PM
Porsche also signed off the Panamera hoping that the public would think it's good looking. just because they say something, doesn't mean it's right :p.

I agree with you that the 911 isn't a GT car in it's strictest definition, but you can't argue that it often competes against cars like the XK and 5 Series, or at the other end of the spectrum the Merc CL, Bentley GT, Maserati GranTurismo.

Your argument is that the 911 doesn't have much space. well that argument in itself is flawed. from personal experience (although to be fair i've never personally owned one) the 911 has enough space for it's back seats to be used as luggage space. therefore i would argue that it's at least as practical as an XK. ergo, if you don't need the back seat space (which you clearly don't if you bought an XK), it has ample luggage space and you COULD use it as a GT car for yourself and a passenger.

in my mind, a GT car is the kind of car you can drive cross country, or cross continent if you prefer, and arrive at the other end feeling fresh. it should, as you rightly point out, have space for yourself, a passenger and luggage. the 911 fits that criteria. no doubt it's an iconic sports car, but in recent years it's fitted the GT bill just as adequately.

there are obviously other cars that can do the job (i.e. i'd prefer an S-Class to a CL for that particular journey and in the same vein your dad may prefer the Land Cruiser or yourself the Fiat) but to say that other cars do the job as well is a moot point. chavs do doughnuts it old Saxos, but that doesn't make them sports cars, does it :p.

GRAVE
October 9, 2009 7:30 PM
Actually the sedan is way over priced, and now this is more expensive i prefer a CL over this.

nederina
October 9, 2009 8:33 PM
I couldn't agree with you more. I love the CL. It feels even more luxurious than the Panamera, Conti GT and classy too also the fact that they're more exclusive.

Get_real
October 9, 2009 11:14 PM
lol, and this forum is considered to be a place of people who like driver cars. I have nothing against a CL but as someone who like 'driving', I'm sure the CL is nothing compared to the Panamera. (now I just need someone to let me drive both to be sure :-))

nederina
October 10, 2009 2:08 AM
If you want a driver's car, you'll ended up with a 911 GT3 and not the Panamera which exactly the point why we love the CL. And classier too.

McNamara68
October 10, 2009 7:29 AM
+1

I'll take the CL over the Panamera too. The CL is the ultimate GT, imo; just put down all the windows with that pillarless design and go. Arguably top 5 best looking cars in production today.

Get_real
October 10, 2009 10:58 AM
Ofcourse the GT3 is more pure as a drivers car (IMHO the best, especially in RS form). That's besides the point I want to make. GT3 will be more a second car next to another car that will have to be practical enough to keep the missus and children happy. I believe that a Panamera can do that but still offer me the driving pleasure a CL couldn't give me. Compared to a Panamera, the CL is a boat. BTW, I'm not saying anything about the looks, it's veeery clear quite some people on this forum have strong issues with the Panamera's looks. No prob for me, I can even say I like the looks of CL.

Francois
October 9, 2009 9:10 PM
Panamera Cabrio???? Porsche please make a Coupe, SUV, Estate , Compact and SUT version. And maybe a Truck. And a Smart competitor Panamera based. Congratulations.

exige85
October 9, 2009 9:43 PM
I imagine a full 4 seater cabrio Panamera model will have to fight with the Maserati GranCabrio. Looking at the Panamera, I seriously doubt it'll be anywhere near as elegant.

joshg_5
October 9, 2009 9:43 PM
Oh no, please don't tell me this is their answer to the 928!!??!?!?!?!?

We want a coupe 2+2!!!

trinity
October 9, 2009 9:53 PM
Seriously? i think cutting off the roof might take some of the weird angles, it might make this car look alright. anyways nothing will stop them from doing it so i guess we should be optimistic.

GRAVE
October 9, 2009 10:58 PM
Having a cabrio Panamera like having cabrio estate car! it will look funny. Now I want Merc to make a Cabrio CL, now this will look gorgeous.

McNamara68
October 10, 2009 7:32 AM
YES! I would love to have seen the Ocean Drive Concept go into production, what a beautiful car that was.

maloparac
October 9, 2009 11:42 PM
Noup. it will be Targa or with big central soft roof, there is no place for hardtop even for softtop, and with that big car it will loose body integrity without roof for high speeds

theoldman
October 10, 2009 12:47 AM
nice!!! this is an affordable cabriolet version of the four-door coupe

2010S5
October 10, 2009 2:15 AM
A short Panamera with no top? Please, no. I can already see the monstrority in my head.

lucifa
October 10, 2009 3:53 AM
I went to a Porsche showroom yesterday to have a closer look at the Panamera, and all I have to say is this: all of you haters are either short sighted or narrow minded fools. This looks fantastic in the metal, paricularly the fully optioned Turbo. It's the same as the Bangle BMW's -- not photogenic, but stunning up close.

McNamara68
October 10, 2009 7:31 AM
i was open to the possibility of the Panamera being better looking in the flesh until you brought up the bangle-butt bimmers, that destroyed all your credibility haha

THERENAISSANCEMAN
October 10, 2009 11:22 AM
lucifa , you were obviously taken by Porsche's build quality which is undeniably impeccable . but look beyond that aspect and you too would begin to realize this car's physical design shortcomings .


Edited by user on October 10, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Get_real
October 11, 2009 1:59 AM
who makes you the oracle of automotive design? If you don't like it, OK, good for you. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with the car's design. Some people like it, some don't, the same goes for EVERY car. I wouldn't call the Panamera pretty but I do find it impressive. In my opinion that was the goal for this car, so mission accomplished.

2010S5
October 11, 2009 5:15 AM
What right do you have to speak for other people's opinions on car design. In the end, I will always think this car is plain ugly, as so will many other 'short sighted or narrow minded fools'. That rear end just doesn't do it for me at all.

Get_real
October 11, 2009 12:38 PM
Have to add something, I replied to therenaissanceman for speaking for other people's opinion. I should've made that apply to lucifa too because he does the same albeit in the 'other direction'. Anyway someone who doesn't like the car is NOT narrowminded nor short-sighted. But someone who dares to say something good about it, doesn't have to admit the car has fundamental design shortcomings.

THERENAISSANCEMAN
October 14, 2009 11:25 AM
GET REAL , read PHYSICAL design shortcomings , which refers strongly to this car's FAILED physical proportions. and yes, i do have my EYES to tell me that this car had utterly failed in that department along with the rest of those disgusted Porsche fans who were shortchanged by Zuffenhausen's tradition of designing and manufacturing automobiles that perform and equally LOOK GOOD like the models 993 , 928,944 , 914 , 959 ,all of which speaks volumes for themselves VISUALLY and performance wise and who do not have to resort to plagiarizing a mobile phone's features to incorporate it into their instrumentation panel just so to salvage the Panamera's humpbacked profile . GET REALLY REAL....GET REAL

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links