VW Golf R Uncovered Ahead of Frankfurt Debut - photos

Related Articles

Add comment

subscribe to comments
comment rules Add comment

Comments (19)

With 199kW (up 15kW over the R32) and a quicker-reacting all-wheel-drive system, the Golf R accelerates from 0-100km/h in a claimed 5.5 seconds when the engine is mated to a six-speed dual-clutch automated manual. (5.7sec six-speed manual.) http://www.theage.com.au/drive/motor-news/move-over-gti-heres-the-golf-r-20090918-fuwp.html
Sep 19, 2009 2:59 pm
0 0
how correct is 0-100 times? given that the s3 sportback is 5.8sec and the 3 door 5.7
Sep 18, 2009 11:53 am
0 0
Sep 18, 2009 11:52 am
0 0
Finally a car with no electric shock hazard in this site.
Sep 15, 2009 7:26 pm
0 0
Aaw, this just looks perfect!
Sep 15, 2009 7:12 pm
0 0
The upcoming R sure looks great all round...glad to hear VW has kept the trademark 4 motion AWD system and that makes the R different from the GTi...the new wheels sure are an improvement though...other option would be a set of 18's VMR VB3 imo... :)
Sep 15, 2009 3:15 am
0 0
The brilliant sound of the V6 used in the previous R32s will be missed.
Sep 15, 2009 2:26 am
0 0
265hp beats the the last R32 with better mileage and cleaner emissions as well. VW seems to take a more understated route with the R.
Sep 15, 2009 1:25 am
0 0
Looks really similar to the Scirocco R, but still good!
Sep 14, 2009 10:15 pm
0 0
2.0L, with 265hp, not too shabby. If you asked me that 2.0L should have been a 2.5 I-5, turbocharged, belting out 300+ hp with an alias of "R25". But what do I know? I'm just one person of the consumer population. So how much is VW asking for this?
Sep 14, 2009 9:48 pm
0 0
Thank you VW for getting rid of those nasty rims ! But I would still get the Scirocco, it just looks better than this...
Sep 14, 2009 9:10 pm
0 0
The rear looks excellent, I can't wait for some tuning company to put in the v6, because this engine is just not done. Why buy this if the GTI has basically the same engine?
Sep 14, 2009 8:54 pm
0 0
"It also adds VW's 4Motion AWD to its architecture." This is the main reason to buy one!
Sep 14, 2009 10:29 pm
0 0
basically the same engine? because it's a 2.0 liter 4? 65 more horses sounds nice...
Sep 14, 2009 11:23 pm
0 0
expected TT RS´ 5-cylinder, 7-Speed-DSG, nicer wheels and led lights... boring... but the rear lights are nice
Sep 14, 2009 8:31 pm
0 0
Completely disagree, the new GTi has a lot more presence than the old one with that muscular front intake. I think the wheels would be more suited to a Golf 1.4, how boring. R32 is much better looking imo. And the power output? 6.5 seconds? Is that it?
Sep 14, 2009 8:22 pm
0 0
I prefer this new front to the standard GTi. The standard GTi looks a bit dull compared to the previous Mark 5.
Sep 14, 2009 7:24 pm
0 0
It's okay, but to me it actually looks _less_ agressive than the standard GTI, just like the previous-gen R32, which looked more Jetta-ish than uber-GTI.
Sep 14, 2009 7:03 pm
0 0
that´s a cool looking golf
Sep 14, 2009 6:59 pm
0 0