Fisker Karma Estimated Fuel Economy and Emission Ratings Announced

Rated at 3.5L/100km, 83g CO2/km

Add a Comment

Comments (13)

 6spdaudi 6spdaudi
Why did none of the larger auto companies purchase this technology?
September 8, 2009 4:05 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
the technology is over 100 years old , the batteries are the only new thing. BMW just showed it's diesel powered serial hybrid concept.
September 8, 2009 7:10 pm
 sideskraper sideskraper
because they are all developing their own take on it individually. and have been doing so for many years.
September 8, 2009 4:41 pm
 JonnnnY JonnnnY
"Power comes from a 200kW lithium-ion battery... When the battery is fully charged, the car can travel up to 50 miles (80.5 km) before the petrol engine kicks in to recharge it." draining 200kW battery in 80km ? someone will end up in jail for driving like this...
September 8, 2009 6:19 pm
if the car does first 80km on electric power, it than uses 3.5l petrol for only 20km. So if you`ar driveing for 200km full cunsumption (for the next 100km) is like 17.5l/100km
September 8, 2009 6:36 pm
 CDspeed CDspeed
They fell short of that 100mpg rating they were shooting for. And the range is only 300 miles/ 482km total. I like this car alot but not enough to buy one.
September 8, 2009 6:41 pm
 mooner mooner
The car goes on electrick power for the first 80km than it uses 3.5l for the next 20 (this makes it 3.5l/100km). So if you want to drive the next 100km, the consumption increases to 17.5l/100km. Prove me wrong...
September 8, 2009 6:48 pm
 radmeister radmeister
They would of used the SAE standard for testing a Hybrid-electric vehicle. I doubt they only did 100km in their test run. Probably 500km or more 5x with at least 2 vehicles. I don't know exactly the details couldn't find the procedure online without having to pay....
September 9, 2009 3:10 am
 sideskraper sideskraper
The SAE standard is fairly complex, and I don't have the updated standard but I do know that it involves partial charge testing, full charge testing, hybrid mode, full electric mode, and full conventional gasoline mode. It takes into account many things such as converting the electrical recharge energy into an energy-equivalent volume of gasoline to add to the actual volume of fuel consumed. Weighting of test results against against US national driving statistics, etc. It really isn't as simple as (in this case) simply multiplying 3.5L by 5 to get 17.5. If the consumption according to the testing is 3.5L per 100km, then it will be so out there in "average American". The average is derived from data collected by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration. To use an apt term, your mileage may vary. ;)
September 9, 2009 8:22 am
 NewGit NewGit
Hope it doesn't burst into flames like an ipod. Actually I'd like to know how fussy the li-ion batteries are in this thing. If they are like my laptop's batteries, they are going to be expensive to replace.
September 8, 2009 7:55 pm
 vilivo vilivo
They said estimated... that would mean they THINK it will be... I think its a nice bit of marketing, and we are, evidently, paying attention, so, it's working...
September 8, 2009 8:01 pm
 Oliver Oliver
I don't believe any word before they show a running & production ready car!
September 9, 2009 6:07 am
 Siawa Siawa
How much the electric bill will go up?!
September 9, 2009 2:09 pm