Hennessey VENOM GT Concept Car Headed for Geneva with 1200bhp

 Hennessey VENOM GT Concept Car Headed for Geneva with 1200bhp
Hennessey Venon GT concept illustrations - 1280

A Bugatti beater?

Hennessey Performance Engineering has announced that their Venom GT Concept will be officially unveiled at the 2010 Geneva Motor Show.

Boasting a 1200 bhp V8 engine, of unspecified displacement, the Venom GT is expected to accelerate from 0-60 mph in 2.4 seconds before hitting a top speed of 272 mph (440 km/h). If Hennessey is correct, the Venom GT will easily surpass the Bugatti Veyron's top speed of 254 mph (408 km/h). Should that fail to impress you, Hennessy also says the Venom GT will accelerate from 0-100 mph in 5.3 seconds, 0-150 mph in 8.9 seconds, and 0-200 mph in 14.3 seconds.

In order to achieve these insane performance figures, Hennessey strictly followed the idea of creating a lightweight supercar. The company estimates that Venom GT will weigh less than 2,400 lbs which is roughly 1,700 lbs lighter than the Veyron.

Designed by Steve Everitt, the Venom GT has an aggressive appearance that should produce plenty of downforce thanks to its massive "VenomAero" rear wing. If things get a little dicey, the massive 14-inch carbon brake rotors (with 6-piston calipers up front, 4-piston calipers in rear) will brings things to halt.

Look for more information to be released closer to the car's unveiling in March 2010.

[UPDATE] Press release added below - includes base price of $600,000.

Source: Hennessey

Hennessey Performance Engineering (HPE) will be unveiling its VENOM GT supercar to the public for the first time at the 2010 Geneva Motor Show. The VENOM GT will be powered by Hennessey's specially-tuned version of the Corvette ZR1's LS9 engine, which will be both supercharged and twin-turbocharged. With over 1,000 bhp of power on tap, and a curb weight under 2,500 lbs, the mid-engine VENOM GT will boast an astounding power-to-weight ratio of less than 2.5 to 1.

"It goes without saying that I am not the first Texan to come up with the idea of marrying a powerful American V8 with a light-weight British chassis," says company founder, John Hennessey, referring to legendary tuner Carroll Shelby. "However, I am confident that automotive fans around the world will find our forthcoming VENOM GT to be every bit as earth-shattering as the 289 AC Cobra was back in the early 1960's".

The company currently has three orders for the VENOM GT, which is based on a radically modified Lotus Exige S chassis. Cost for the base vehicle with 1,000 bhp is $600,000 US Dollars.

About Hennessey Performance Engineering
HPE is one of the world's premier automotive aftermarket tuners. The company, founded by John and Hope Hennessey, builds some of the world's fastest and most powerful sports cars, muscle cars and sport-utility vehicles that have been praised by the automotive media as well as have set numerous world first's and/or world records. HPE is located at Lonestar Motorsports Park in Sealy, Texas, (just west of Houston, Texas).

2011 Venom GT Specifications:

Vehicle Type:
• Mid-engine, rear-drive; 2-door, 2-passenger

Dimensions:
• Curb Weight: 2395 lbs

Engine:
• Hennessey 1000 HP V8 Twin Turbo System
• Dry Sump Oil System

Transmission:
• 6-speed Manual

Brakes:
• Front - 15 inch carbon rotors with 6-piston calipers
• Rear - 14 inch carbon rotors with 4-piston calipers

Power:
• 1000 bhp @ 6600 rpm
• 950 lb-ft torque @ 4,800 rpm

Estimated Performance:
• 0-60 mph: 2.2 sec.
• 0-100 mph: 4.9 sec.
• 0-150 mph: 7.9 sec.
• 0-200 mph: 14.5 sec.
• Top Speed: 262 mph

Purchase Details:

Base Price: $600,000 US Dollars

Build & Payment Schedule: Allow 9 month build time. A $200,000 US Dollar payment is due to confirm an order. A $200,000 payment due after 4 months. Final payment due upon completion.

Options:
• 1200 bhp Engine Upgrade (must use 98 octane fuel): $125,000
• Right Hand Drive: $24,500
• Air Freight Shipping: Call

 

Add a Comment

Comments (29)

Subscribe to comments
 2010S5 2010S5
Why does this car look so much like an Exige? And those are insane performance figures.
August 13, 2009 12:06 pm
 MadMaTTer MadMaTTer
Lotus was the first thing that came to my mind when i saw it for the first time. looks good, but it is a complete ripoff from lotus.
August 13, 2009 2:41 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
maybe it's based on the Exige.
August 13, 2009 5:08 pm
 FOXHOUND FOXHOUND
when the concept was originally announced about 2 years ago it was plainly stated that this car IS based on the current lotus elise/exige styling so it looks like the elise because it is in fact based off of the elise/exige.
August 13, 2009 6:16 pm
 moodyaaa moodyaaa
WoW .. i put wings ,, then fly :D
August 13, 2009 12:06 pm
 Lemon Lemon
Does Steve Everitt happen to work for Lotus? That thing doesn't look like or slightly resemble an Exige, it IS an Exige. You can't just change a few dimensions and call it your own.
August 13, 2009 12:09 pm
 super_car_muscle_man super_car_muscle_man
lol, you took the words right out of my mouth. and what exactly did he design? he quite clearly had the blueprint for the elise in his back pocket. when it says "designed by steve everit" does it mean just the design or more than that..? because if it is just teh design, his name is not worthy of even a mention.
August 14, 2009 1:53 pm
 Scarcliff Scarcliff
Looks Like The Lotus Exige GT3 Racer To Me.
August 13, 2009 12:16 pm
 Siawa Siawa
The one thing that really distinguishes Veyron from competitors is it's original exterior. Every other sport car looks like some other sport car in one way or another.
August 13, 2009 12:49 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
how about the luxurious interior and the smooth ride at top speed ?
August 13, 2009 1:56 pm
 Siawa Siawa
That comes later. The first thing you look in a car from pics is the exterior. And this car is yet another example of common design.
August 13, 2009 2:07 pm
 N20_Purge N20_Purge
Very fast. but it is still just an Exige. For some reason I'd still take a lotus over this. I dunno why. :P
August 13, 2009 12:51 pm
 leebromley leebromley
Nice Exige drawings.
August 13, 2009 1:27 pm
 Cala7 Cala7
It's a shame that all designers are foul these days... Nobody can design a car that isn't based on another car.
August 13, 2009 2:03 pm
 lucifa lucifa
Lamborghini Murciélago, Bugatti Veyron, Ferrari 458, Nissan GT-R, Audi R8, Maserati Quattreporte, Jaguar XF, E60 BMW 5 Series.. no, no I think they can. ;)
August 14, 2009 7:29 am
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
This thing smells all wrong. First off, it plagiarises an Exige. Not only is that ethically questionable, it raises the question of who will pay what these guys will be asking for something that looks like a £40K Lotus. Secondly, the performance stats. I read that the Veyron would need an additional 100bhp to add 1mph to its top speed. How do these guys think they're going to get to 272mph? A lighter car will help acceleration, but low weight doesn't help in ultimate top speed, as inertia is fighting against the air at 250mph. Is this thing REALLY so much air efficient than the Veyron that it can 20mph more with just 200bhp extra? I think they've lost the plot!
August 13, 2009 2:33 pm
 sideskraper sideskraper
The 100bhp for extra 1 mph is Veyron marketing rhetoric. It's not a rule that stands firm for all vehicles. Gear ratio is as important as aerodynamics and power ultimately. At the end of the day if this car does make the figures it claims we all know it won't deliver the complete experience that the Veyron does. And I think that's why we all hold the Veyron in such high esteem. We know it is the most "complete" car that has ever been made.
August 13, 2009 3:41 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
Mercedes W125 Rekord got to 432 km/h , 269 mph in 1938 with only 736 hp. it is still the fastest car ever driven on a public road. aerodynamics is important, the Veyron isn't very aerodynamic because Ferdinand Piech was too stubborn and he wanted to keep that shape. the Veyron would be a lot faster with a more aerodynamic shape.
August 13, 2009 4:35 pm
 sideskraper sideskraper
So, until there is data available on this "car" (very loose definition given it's a few sketches right now) and it's aerodynamic performance, it's pretty hard to discount it's top speed potential.
August 13, 2009 4:47 pm
 super_car_muscle_man super_car_muscle_man
wow scratchy, i just checked out the merc W125. I cannot believe that they made a 5.5l v12 engine in 1938 that produced 736 bhp! thats truely impressive!
August 14, 2009 1:58 pm
 TheAlchemist TheAlchemist
2400 lbs, it doesn't have the mass to get up to over 270mph, I don't care how much horsepower you have.
August 13, 2009 3:16 pm
 MonnoncMaxou MonnoncMaxou
Weren't Hennessey having tons of issues delivering Vipers to customers who had paid? How are they still in business?
August 13, 2009 4:08 pm
 sideskraper sideskraper
To be honest on a second look, I quite like the Mclaren F1, Carrera GT type lines from the front and side.
August 13, 2009 5:02 pm
 Sedaer Sedaer
Elise with 12,000,000 HP; where do I sign?
August 13, 2009 5:40 pm
 Aesthetics Aesthetics
looks very original doesnt it.... as original as the geely ge on the r-r phantom...
August 13, 2009 6:08 pm
 LifeLongCarGuy LifeLongCarGuy
I don't know about you, but I'm getting bored of car manufacturers making street legal race cars. At the end of the day it's all overkill. I prefer a "normal" looking car with respectable horsepower (less than 500) that is still fast, can handle and has amenities.
August 14, 2009 10:46 am
 dimeNickel dimeNickel
interesting...wont pass emissions in the states for sure, not to say california
August 14, 2009 5:32 pm
 WildMaverick1200 WildMaverick1200
A lotus? I always wondered what would a lotus would be with a massive engine. I think this is an exaggeration, but now I know. (lol, even if it's not a lotus)
August 16, 2009 8:18 pm
 EH? EH?
why try beating the veyron first the 9ff ruf, then the ssc thingy, then the mosler landshark, now this and countless others have tried to beat up the veyron but they wont come into production or end up matching the performance to the figures they produce. what an absolute mess at the back and a lotus exige front?
August 16, 2009 9:13 pm