Next generation Dodge Viper rumoured to receive Ferrari V10

2008 Dodge Viper SRT10

American style, Italian performance?

By Michael Gauthier
August 12, 2009 5:05 PM
Filed Under: American, Dodge, European, Ferrari, Rumours

New rumours have emerged suggesting that the next generation Dodge Viper may receive a Ferrari-designed V10 engine.

While details are limited, the report indicates that Fiat's CEO, Sergio Marchionne, wants to take advantage of the fact that the Viper is Chrysler's "halo" vehicle. The benefits seem pretty obvious, the engine sharing would reduce development costs (by spreading its use over multiple brands) and the engine pedigree might boost Viper sales.

Like the current generation of Ferrari engines, the next generation of engines will be offered in a variety of different configurations and displacements. If everything goes according to plan, Ferrari and Maserati would get new V8s while the Viper would receive a new pushrod V10.

Despite sounding like a dream come true, we're still a tad skeptical. Only a few months ago Chrysler was attempting to sell the Viper, only to eventually keep it after a lack of serious offers.

Source: caranddriver.com via autoblog.com

Comments

Bristol411S3
August 12, 2009 5:19 PM
I can't see it happening. Whereas Ferrari are shameless in marketing the brand (Ferrari playing cards anyone?) I doubt they'd want to be seen powering a Dodge, especially if the next version is as unsophisticated as the current.

Renegade
August 12, 2009 5:31 PM
I think that the Viper is more "sophisticated " then a pair of Ferrari socks, and yeah the Viper should sound american, not italian, just make small upgrades to the Viper engine and it will be fine, also a Ferrari engine will mean goodbye torque, goodbye torque will mean goodbye Viper.

scratchy996
August 12, 2009 6:44 PM
why would a Ferrari engine mean good bye torque ? if they make a big engine specially for Viper it will have more torque and more horsepower than the current Viper engine.

carcrazy1234
August 12, 2009 7:17 PM
he's right... ferrari don't have a lot of torque. comparably speaking. their all about high revving, lightweight, high horsepower, ear orgasmic.... i lost my train of thought. damnit lol but i think i got my point through haha

scratchy996
August 12, 2009 9:23 PM
they don't have a lot of torque because they use small engines and they don't need a lot of torque for their light cars. but i bet the Ferrari engineers can design a better engine than the Viper engine in their lunch break, especially if they have to build a slow revving 8l+ engine.

harshreality
August 12, 2009 10:04 PM
to "renegade".. no torque? Spoken like a true caveman. Give the Viper engineers only 4.3 liters to work with(and dont let them outsource it to another company) and see how much power they come up with. To only get 600hp out of 8.4 liters is truly embarassing. The replacement for displacement is called technology.

sideskraper
August 12, 2009 5:26 PM
If Chrysler are keeping the Viper, and Fiat are effectively the new masters of Chrysler then it makes sense to keep a single architecture for all the high performance specialised sports car engines. As opposed to having one anomalous engine in the range. I can see it happening.

MTC
August 12, 2009 5:26 PM
Will it be a Ferrari tuned Viper V10, with 8.4L to play with? or a proper Italian hardcore, high revving V10?

AMGBrabusMercTuners
August 12, 2009 6:21 PM
well they said new pushrod V10 and the viper is a muscle car so i suppose it could be like a 8.0L engine and be the same as before just a bit more sophisticated

scratchy996
August 12, 2009 6:48 PM
a proper Italian high revving engine would be too expensive. a big low revving pushrod engine will be their choice, most probably with direct injection.

MTC
August 13, 2009 3:02 PM
If that's the case, how many horsepower will the new 8.0L+ V10 make? 700hp?

klitemaster1000
August 12, 2009 5:51 PM
it seems to me like everyone has forgotten that just two months ago GM was going down the drain and needed italians to bail them out. now everyone is talking as if GM is the leading carmaker in the world. any ferrari will kill the viper anyday. just think of this question: if money was not a problem, which car will you buy: Ferrari or Viper? i think the answer is obvious.

EDavis
August 13, 2009 12:23 AM
"any Ferrari will kill the Viper any day"

???????

Viper fans are still waiting for a Ferrari, any Ferrari (well, not the FXX of course), to topple the Viper ACRs Nurburgring lap time. Not saying that it can't be done, just that it hasn't happened yet.

And hasn't the Viper earned a reputation on the international racing scene as a car capable of beating Ferrari? I pretty sure the answer is yes.

With that said, yes, if I had the money I would certainly purchase a Ferrari...and a Viper.

scratchy996
August 13, 2009 3:36 PM
if Ferrari wants , they could make a car that tops the 'Ring time any day, do you really think that is a problem for them ? if a small company like Radical can make a sub 7 minutes car, why couldn't Ferrari do it ?

about that question , of course most people would buy a Ferrari if money was no option. in the real world a car like the 599 or California is much better than a track car like the ACR.

dmanero
August 14, 2009 5:27 PM
Ferrari can easily knock the viper of the board at the ring, its below them and they far better than having to prove themselves. Viper - Ferrari, mmmm, hands down a Ferrari they have a better reputation and looks 10 better. When last have you seen any high profile person driving a viper. most of them go for real supercars. European breed.

super_car_muscle_man
August 14, 2009 5:41 PM
i think its quite redicluous to think that people would choose the viper over the ferrari. so to answer the question, the ferrari would be the overwhelming choice. the ferrari is a way better car in every aspect. its only through personal preference for the love of a big V10 that someone would choose a viper and that would also only happen in America.

klitemaster1000
August 12, 2009 5:52 PM
my bad: replace GM with Chrysler

sideskraper
August 12, 2009 6:09 PM
And at the end of the day, the Viper and Ferrari are competing in different markets. There is very little overlap.

JonnnnY
August 12, 2009 6:32 PM
8.0liters, 800Nm, 8'000rpm, 800hp... Yes Please !!!

only little problem could be 80'000$ price tag for that engine... :D

Prince_Ash
August 12, 2009 6:32 PM
american style and italien power ? ... meaning... shitty style and exclusive power that they most likey wont get.

BENZian
August 12, 2009 6:36 PM
...as has already been said this makes sense...spreading devleopment costs among Ferrari (Top), Maserati(Mid) and Viper (entry)...upgrading the Viper/Chrysler halo vehicle...perhaps they will put the Viper against the Gallardo...and btw...I think Fiat/Ferrari is too smart not to lighten the viper, give it a more sophisticated platform and fix any handling deficits after all they know a thing or 2 about supercars...hmmmmm...a $100,000 Viper with a Ferrari engine competing against higher priced Astons, Lambos, heck even the new MB SLS...this could be the start of something very interesting. Good Luck Fiat/Ferrari/Viper...

nickmini
August 12, 2009 6:46 PM
B-A-D A-*-* machine, can't wait!!

dbehmoaras
August 12, 2009 6:48 PM
Ah the beauty of capitalism... Who knew it would have an American fornicate with an Italian to create something special. Things are starting to get interesting...

EDavis
August 12, 2009 7:38 PM
The current tried and true Viper V10, a gloriously unsophisticated low-revving torque monster, was really nothing more than the old 318/360 truck engine with 2 additional cylinders attached. If Dodge (or Fiat) feel that they must improve the engine of the Viper, I think that they could simply add 2 more cylinders to Dodges' ultra-powerful NASCAR V8. Its a proven winner on the racetrack so most of the development has already been done, its also more compact and lighter. Viper enthusiasts would be proud to boast that their favorite car is powered by an American engine, Ferraris' name wouldn't get dragged through the mud (cuz the Viper would end up being slower...hee hee), and everybody would be happy.

Ferrari no doubt COULD build a large displacement, high torque, low-revving engine to satisfy American tastes, but it just isn't their style.

Alternative: How 'bout a V10 version of the current Hemi, complete with Chryslers' Multi-Displacement System (MDS) and variable valve timing.


Edited by user on August 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM
sideskraper
August 12, 2009 8:15 PM
are you kidding me? take the nascar v8 strap on two more cylinders and put it in the viper? it's not april 1 again already is it?

schnitzerx
August 12, 2009 8:24 PM
I think they got it the wrong way... it should be an American engine on an Italian body... this recipe is called De Tomaso Pantera....

EDavis
August 12, 2009 8:37 PM
sideskraper:

No I'm not kidding. Using race proven/inspired mechanical parts from race engines and adapting them for street use is a proven recipe for success. One of the reasons manufacturers get involved in racing to begin with is so that lessons learned in the heat of competition can be applied to their street cars which operate in a far less demanding environment.

Honda does it, Mercedes does it, Ferrari does it, Porsche does it. All of the truly great manufacturers do it.

Why not Dodge?

sideskraper
August 12, 2009 9:19 PM
So where can I buy these regular honda, mercedes, ferrari, or porsche cars with a race engines? Please enlighten me. Because the last time I checked there was a huge difference between the engines available in all their cars and the engines they used in motorsport (with minor exceptions).

Nascar engines are old fashioned, archaic, pushrod, cast iron, carbureted dinosaurs that are about as relevant to today's sports cars as silly putty. Great as they might be on the race track they don't have the performance, economy, emissions, affordability or durability required for a road car.


Edited by user on August 12, 2009 at 9:19 PM
scratchy996
August 12, 2009 9:34 PM
i don't know about Honda and Merc, but Carrera GT has an engine that was developed for racing and then turned into a street legal engine. the 911 GT3 engine is directly derived from the racing engine used in 1998 in the GT1. Ferrari 599 engine is a detuned Enzo engine, used in GT1 racing in the Maserati MC12. i think the Scuderia engine is derived from the F430 GT2 engine.

sideskraper
August 12, 2009 9:56 PM
Hence the few exceptions.

When was the Carrera GT engine used in racing? It wasn't. Really it could come down to simple marketing rhetoric.

The 599 engine is developed from the Enzo engine. A road car. the MC12 engine is developed from the Enzo engine too. The F430 GT2 was developed from the engine in the standard F430 engine. All of which can trace their "heritage" to formula two engines of the 60's. BUT they can hardly be argued as race car engines thrown into road cars. And I think you will find that the 911 GT3 engine tracks back to road cars past the 1998 GT1 (not disputing the heritage, it just doesn't seem right to me)

Road car engines/blocks/architecture developed into racing engines is nothing new. In fact they are in the majority. Show me where I buy a Honda or Mercedes or Ferrari or Porsche with a race car engine. Real racing engines cost tens of times the cost of road engines, and ignoring economy, emissions, drivability, etc, they have to last a dozen or so races between rebuilds not hundreds of thousands of kilometers.

Why does chevy bother with developing the LS series when they can just sling in a V8 from NASCAR. Why does Holden use LS engines when they can get similarly archaic engines from V8 supercars? Why can't I buy an Audi with the engine from a R10 or R15?


Edited by user on August 12, 2009 at 9:57 PM
scratchy996
August 12, 2009 10:11 PM
the Carrera GT was developed for racing , but then the regulations changed and they used it in a road car instead. the GT3 engine is directly derived from the GT1 engine. google it. of course you can't use racing engines on the road , but there are engines that derive from racing.


Edited by user on August 12, 2009 at 10:21 PM
EDavis
August 12, 2009 11:17 PM
sideskraper:

I never said or even implied that engines are, have been, nor should they ever be plucked straight out of the race car and placed in an old womans' grocery getter. That my fantasy "NASCAR V10" would have to be detuned, civilized, cleaned up, i.e. fuel injected, and in general made to be more efficient, is so obvious that I didn't feel it was even worth mentioning.

In the past the only way to tell the difference between a connecting rod that failed at 5,000 rpm and one that didn't was to put it on the racetrack. The rod that survived was put in grandpas' Buick. That engines have become ever more powerful, efficient, and compact is directly attributable to racing.

BTW: Dodges' current 5.9 liter (358 c.i.) NASCAR type engine, the "dinosaur," you know, the one that's "old fashioned, archaic, [uses] pushrod(s), [and is made from] cast iron," puts out a little more than 800hp and it doesn't fly apart at 9000 rpm. Add 2 cylinders, give it fuel injection, an aluminum block, and then send it to charm school and put it in a Viper.

Copy. Paste. Enjoy.

http://www.viddler.com/explore/BangShiftVideo/videos/29/

Also: Hondas' very first forays into the four-wheeled world took place in Formula 1, and Mercedes was racing at the turn of the last century. Next time you're hauling the kids to soccer practice and your tach needle swings past 7,000 rpm and the engine doesn't explode, thank a racing engineer.


Edited by user on August 13, 2009 at 1:24 AM
harshreality
August 12, 2009 11:53 PM
The F50 used a V12 from a formula 1 car

Dragos_DreS
August 12, 2009 9:20 PM
Are Ferrari engines really all that great?

They are not as reliable as we all like to think!

scratchy996
August 12, 2009 9:43 PM
Ferrari engines are race derived, high revving, made to squeeze the maximum possible amount of power out of a given displacement. the old engines were not reliable , the new ones can be used daily, but they require good maintenance.

for the Viper, however, Ferrari engineers don't have to go to extremes, with more than 8 liters displacement to work with they will design a cheap, low tech, high displacement, slow revving engine that will be easy to maintain and reliable too.

HEMI426
August 12, 2009 9:57 PM
If they fresh this 8.4L v10 up, and if it than had like the ferrari 458 italia 127hp/litre it should have 1066 hp. that's not far from dubble the power of the current engine

CarLife
August 12, 2009 9:59 PM
The Viper gets Italian Genes once again.

The original Viper had a Lamborghini aluminum block version V10 of the RAM truck!

Now I wonder if they'll have Schumacher do some track development on this.

contact_edward
August 12, 2009 11:05 PM
The logic is weird... "save development costs," but later says "receive a new pushrod V10." An Italian engine would kill the Viper IMHO. Why? Most people that buy them consider them more of a muscle car. They love the big-engine torque and characteristics; not an edgy loud and tempermental Ferrari engine. In a nutshell NASCAR people vs. Formula 1 people. Get it people?

scratchy996
August 13, 2009 1:20 AM
you don't get it. it won't be a typical Ferrari engine. it will be a dumbed down muscle car engine developed by Ferrari. btw, Lambo helped develop the first Viper engine so there always was something Italian in the Viper engine.

pmontero
August 13, 2009 3:43 PM
Designing and building a new OHV V10 with Ferrari input is absurd given the fact that they have zero know how with purshrod designs, and also it would end up being too expensive in the end. It´s better to leave that part to the Mopar guys who know their stuff and can deliver an appropriate engine for the car in terms of power, torque, sound and driveability, and still not drive the retail price through the roof.

WildMaverick1200
August 13, 2009 12:21 AM
I think it's a stupid idea for a stupid car.

elsonlau
August 13, 2009 8:27 AM
I told you already. Once Fiat owns a share in a troubled American automobile firm, the Dodge Viper will use Ferrari's powerplant. Giving more torque performance.

bosaleh74
August 13, 2009 9:32 AM
Dodge Viper needs more than an Ferrari engine.. its wayfarer behind from zr1 engineering

lucifa
August 13, 2009 10:44 AM
So an Italian supercar V10 on an American muscle car chassis... sounds lethal. I want one. ;)

pmontero
August 13, 2009 3:45 PM
a Viper needs an engine that fits its american brute muscle personality... a Ferrari high pitch screamer does not match this, and would likely double or triple the car´s production cost in one swipe.

Not happening IMO.


Edited by user on August 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
xLumino
August 13, 2009 9:12 PM
Lamborghini developed the V10, Crysler used for it's first Viper RT/10. Any questions about the togetherness of italien engine and american muscle-design?

dimeNickel
August 14, 2009 9:38 PM
still perfer a big loud muscle-screaming v10 under the long hood of the viper than a ferrari engine

jrep25pr
September 6, 2009 12:34 AM
I believe that by adding even more italian design to the american car world would show a weak spot in America. With the Ford Mustang loosing its muscle look to italian designers and other current vehicles using italian mods, it seems that america just doesnt car about the competitions between companies. Adding an italian inspired V-10 would bring interests to the Viper but it would lose its muscle car sound and performance. Yea the original V-10 was produced by Lamborghini but the americans changed it up to fit the standard that america wants and eventually configured it to be completely american.

Douglas6250
September 21, 2009 9:15 PM
HEMI426 is right. Just check out the Saleen S7 Twin Turbo and the Ultimate Aero. They're both American rear wheel drive monsters with over 1000HP so possibly they can have a 600-700HP version and then get an ultimate 1000HP+ version. (Although I hope to see a viper with gd fuel economy and brilliant handling) !!

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links