EPA has Not Tested the Chevrolet Volt

 EPA has Not Tested the Chevrolet Volt
Chevrolet Volt Achieves a 230 MPG EPA City rating

General Motors' claim that the upcoming Chevrolet Volt would achieve a city fuel average of 230mpg has been challenged by the learned guys at Green Car Advisor. Having understood from GM that the Volt would break fuel consumption records thanks to its drivetrain, GCA went and asked the EPA for clarification, seeing that its methods were used to return that figure.

The EPA then issued a statement that goes: "EPA has not tested a Chevy Volt and therefore cannot confirm the fuel economy values claimed by GM. EPA does applaud GM's commitment to designing and building the car of the future - an American-made car that will save families money, significantly reduce our dependence on foreign oil and create good-paying American jobs. We're proud to see American companies and American workers leading the world in the clean energy innovations that will shape the 21st century economy."

Quite a patriotic statement no doubt but nothing concrete on the Volt's claims. Some WCF staffers had initially expressed some reservations about the claims which we expressed by saying "Real-life fuel-economy tests by motoring publications seldom match what the automakers claim because of varying load factors, weather conditions, factors like air conditioning etc."

Nevertheless GM has major confidence in its ground-breaking future product. Independent tests conducted by organisations like the EPA and on the Euro cycle should settle the question.

 

Source: edmunds

Add a Comment

Comments (7)

Subscribe to comments
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
To provide a fair MPG rating, EPA should start car's testing with the batteries empty. Also this would show the the gains of running an engine at optimal rpm (torque/fuel consumption) minus the loss of converting the torque of the engine into stored electricity.
August 12, 2009 10:53 am
 sideskraper sideskraper
Whilst initially I was inclined to agree with you, how often realistically will the battery be empty when a journey begins? It is a plug in hybrid after all.
August 12, 2009 1:23 pm
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
You're right, let me reformulate it :-) They should do testing long enough to limit the effects of previously stored energy. Also they should never plug it (otherwise they'd have to compute from the electricity provider the miles per kW on the side). Using plug-in abilities is unfair, as it's an external source of energy. It would be like using a tow truck and measuring the MPG of the car on it.
August 13, 2009 7:26 am
 car-o-bar car-o-bar
This was expected....
August 12, 2009 5:03 pm
 radmeister radmeister
I have come to a conclusion as to what this car really is. It's a pill, to mask our guilt for destroying the environment. Like giving morphine to someone that just lost their leg, they don't feel the pain anymore because the morphine hides it, but their leg is still missing at the end of the day. It moves the pollution from your car to a magical and mystical place that we don't see. The good old power plants, that pollute somewhere else. But don't worry you are saving the environment by moving the pollution from your tail pipe to their smoke stacks, or at least you tell yourself to make it all better. The truth remains your leg is still gone, and when the morphine fades off the pain comes back. Cars are not the problem, planes, tankers, military ships, power plants, steel refineries, industry as a whole is the problem. No control, and the control is a joke. I used to work at a steel refinery, and it was cheaper to dump and pollute and pay the fines than to do it properly. If we want to really do something we have to start caring about what is really harming us, and it's not cars. We have to stop blowing our own legs off metaphorically speaking.
August 13, 2009 9:47 am
 radmeister radmeister
And yeah as per the article i think we already covered the true economy of this car in the previous article. Pollution wise it's the same as a 53mpg petrol car, and as cost efficient as a 56mpg diesel. Really what else matters? Pollution and cost to get to where you need to go. And thats on pure battery power, based on GM's ideal that people don't commute more than 20miles each way to work. The reality is i doubt that's the case so the engine gets like 34mpg or something, so it's actually less than 53-56mpg when you combine it. Not something to really cheer off the roof tops about. Or to make a Cobalt worth 40,000$.
August 13, 2009 9:53 am
 SkadV8 SkadV8
Chevrolet Volt, you will see, will be best selled car in US and it will kick ugly Prius in ass
August 13, 2009 4:45 pm