2010 Hyundai i10 to receive 800cc Turbo

 2010 Hyundai i10 to receive 800cc Turbo
Hyundai i10 blue

New 3-cylinder power plant will come with about 90 bhp with CO2 emissions below the 100 g/km mark

Hyundai will be introducing a new 800cc, turbocharged 3-cylinder engine into its i10 mini car next year. The new engine will sport about 90 bhp and will have CO2 emission below 100 g/km.

A similar powerplant was put on display by Hyundai with the Hyundai i10 Blue CNG concept that premiered at the 2008 Geneva motor show. But that engine was powered by compressed natural gas, emitting only 65 g/km while still having 97 bhp output. Hyundai have probably decided that this i10 i-Blue, as it is likely to be called, would fare better in the market as a straight-up petrol/gasoline powered vehicle.

The i10 i-Blue will be debuting sometime in early 2010 and will likely have a sticker price that tops out the i10 range, placing it above the current range-topping 1.2 Style which costs 8,300 pounds in the U.K. (9,758 euros).

But don't expect prices to be too high, as Hyundai benefits from low production costs on the i10, built in India, and will likely defray those costs further by using the 800cc, turbocharged 3-cylinder engine in other models, including those of sister brand Kia.

 

Source: autocar.co.uk

Add a Comment

Comments (12)

Subscribe to comments
 sj0808 sj0808
800cc with 97 bhb????? wooooooooooooooooooow pretty impressive
August 7, 2009 11:54 am
 dmanero dmanero
I don't see the need for a turbo on such a small engine.
August 7, 2009 12:29 pm
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
To give it more power, while retaining at least some of the benfits of a small engine (low weight, better economy, lower emissions). Was that a trick question?
August 7, 2009 1:24 pm
 kimbo kimbo
go to hyundai engineers and tell them that.
August 7, 2009 5:53 pm
 dmanero dmanero
no it wasn't a trick question, I just don't see the point with adding a turbo to such a small engine. and secondly, with adding a turbo does that not mean you will be adding more gas more often. (I could be wrong on the last point, just what I was told).
August 7, 2009 2:36 pm
 carcrazy1234 carcrazy1234
your thinking about a supercharger... turbocharging a car is related with the exhaust manifold. in small terms... supercharger = gas, turbocharger = air. (correct me if i'm wrong anyone)
August 7, 2009 3:33 pm
 EDavis EDavis
Both turbos and superchargers increase the amount of air going into the engine. A turbo is just an air compressor driven by exhaust pressure that would otherwise go wasted, while a supercharger is an air compressor that is mechanically driven, usually by a belt. With the increase in air provided by the turbo or supercharger, you naturally need to add more fuel to maintain the air/fuel ratio that the engine requires to run properly. BTW, The reason they added the turbo is mostly to increase torque, not horsepower. 600cc motorcycle engines off the showroom floor put out over 100hp, but they don't produce nearly enough torque to shove a car down the road. Theoretically speaking, I repeat, theoretically speaking, if you could spin a gas powered model airplane engine fast enough (5,000,000 rpm?) it could make the same 90hp as this crappy little Hyundai with those oh-so-manly honeycomb graphics. However, this theoretical engine wouldn't produce enough torque to yank a lubed-up hammer handle out of a cats ass. Horsepower is nothing more than a mathematical expression of torque as it relates to rpm.
August 7, 2009 4:16 pm
 moodyaaa moodyaaa
I don't see that a 3 cylinder engine is a good idea. they can get a better performance from a 4 cylinder engine by reducing the capacity . as BWM = 5.0L V10
August 8, 2009 12:12 am
 DeleteThisAccount DeleteThisAccount
Well, Mazda tried your approach with the MX-3 producing the world's smallest V6 - a 1.8L V6... guess how well that turned out...
August 9, 2009 7:32 am
 sideskraper sideskraper
fewer cylinders = fewer parts = less complexity, lower cost of manufacture, lower weight, smaller space required.
August 10, 2009 2:26 am
 hilalst hilalst
i dont belive 90hp in 800cc
August 8, 2009 8:53 am
 DeleteThisAccount DeleteThisAccount
Smart Roadster 700cc Turbo engines with 85Bhp have been easily chipped to produce 100bhp. That's why a turbo is the cheapest and most efficient way to boost power because it gives you a relative performance increase of 20% or more.
August 9, 2009 7:29 am