Daimler loses - Greek court rules in favor of Chinese smart fortwo clone
Justice is blind
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (27)
If the gearbox of the original Smart didn't suck so hard, I'd consider buying one.
May 27, 2009 2:43 pm
so daimler is the only one that have right to build small 2 passenger car?
May 27, 2009 3:04 pm
It has nothing to do with the fact that it is a Supermini 2 passenger car.
It has to do with the fact that it's a blatant copy. It's not impossible to make a similar car that is distinguishable. Toyata did with the IQ.
May 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Oh WTF?! Come on you dumb-arsed judges, wake up! Isn't it obvious people that those within the Greek court are not in tune with the world of motoring. Obviously they don't mind saving a penny or two for some cheap Chinese crap with human body parts probably hidden within the vehicle ( as I speculated before when we talked about that BYD T6 crap-heap, aka cheap Chinese copy of the Porsche Cayenne ), hence their stupid decision based purely on out-dated economics. Shame, Greek court, shame. Even more shame on the Chinese car manufacturing industry, who are about to penetrate my market ( the Australian market ) with their motorised toilet seats. Cause that's all Chinese-made care are good for, crapping in.
May 27, 2009 3:31 pm
Hey man, cool it. Im greek, i don't agree with the decisions although the reasons they stated make sense. Also unless you're illiterate, the article says that many other European states have already taken the same stance and decision, Greece is just echoing others in tough economic times.
May 27, 2009 8:27 pm
that decision is totally stupid... with this paper in their hands chinese clone crap cars will invade all countries (much like H1N1 flu) and they will feel free now to copy more and more brands... hopefully the buyers will know which is which and will refuse these trash bins on wheels
May 27, 2009 4:44 pm
How the hell do the chinese keep getting away with cloning cars? My Lord! Please just kill it
May 27, 2009 5:26 pm
THese chinese are just lazy or they can't pay any designers. The judge on this case has obviously never seen a smart fortwo
May 27, 2009 5:37 pm
I say "You go China!", because Mercedes is simply a trendy wannabe company, where as most Chinese automakers are just trying to get by in a half communist country.
May 27, 2009 6:51 pm
Screw chinese designers. They probably got away with this since 80% of purchasable items have a 'Made in China' logo on them.
May 27, 2009 7:49 pm
So whats new...they've already copied checkers and fire drills...no telling what else is going on behind that big arse wall they built!
May 27, 2009 9:25 pm
they have the audacity to call it 'noble' and had a marketing slogan which says "smarted than the rest".
May 27, 2009 11:39 pm
Hahaha its ironic everyone is screwing chinese cars over when in all honesty I dare anyone who drives a main-stream car to tell me that in their cars there is no parts made from china....
My view on this is simple. European car manufacturers are now forced to up their game. All the better for us consumers who at times have to put up with over-priced cars.
May 28, 2009 1:52 am
Who will buy this piece of sxxx? After we have all had experiences with fake copies for clothing, electronics and so on .. now they think that we will buy an European Car chinese copy? It.s like suicide planning if you buy, not drunke being, a car like this .. the Smart is THE Smart .. and that's it !
May 28, 2009 7:30 am
Application of European tradition of justice to the Asian mentality never works because of remarkable gap between two worlds. One is based on individuality, onto the law supporting rights of one (any) being, second one is collective farm, based on suppression of individuality under "interest" (no such thing but anyway) of many. That case was lost because of the justice as it is blind and so unable to see its own limits on interpretations of law beyond the interests of individual rights with not to be deliberately confronted to any system which is not based on defense of individual interests in that world.
It is a basic conflict in our planet even in accord with Bible.
May 28, 2009 8:10 am
that's right China . don't follow the dirty ,shameless , double-standard example established by the United States of America who stole Nazi Germany's military technology secrets after the war plus their truckload of scientists in order to jumpstart its archaic war machines . ....it's blatant THIEVERY you know...oh , and did I forget to mention about Roosevelt requiring Britain to transfer wholesale it's wartime technology to the US in exchange for the Yanks helping the Brits during the dark days of WW2 ? now that is qualified IMPERIALIST statecraft plain and simple , you know .
May 28, 2009 12:45 pm









