Obama administration sets 35.5-mpg standard for 2016

Average fleet economy rating of 39 mpg for passenger cars and 30 mpg for light trucks

Well, it's been a while coming, and now the Obama administration has done it; imposing tougher fuel economy standards for vehicles sold in the US.

The new standards call for automakers to have an average fleet economy rating of 35.5 miles per gallon (6.63 liters/100 km) by 2016. For passenger cars the average must be 39 mpg (6 liters/100 km) and 30 mpg (7.84 liters/100 km) for light trucks.

The Obama administration estimates the new standards would increase the average price of a vehicle by about 1,300 US dollars.

But this is good news for the competitiveness of the industry, and for California. Now the entire US market will have a single standard, as the new mileage regulations fit those of California that were traditionally stricter. And US automakers will be forced to make models that are, at least on fuel economy, competitive with their Japanese counterparts, who continue to grow their share in the passenger car market.

The new standards may be arriving too late to save GM and Chrysler, who for too long indulged in building large, inefficient vehicles for (in fairness) a fickle public that demanded them and whose products now are generally uncompetitive. But the standards are necessary to address global warming and will ultimately be a plus for the consumer as well.

Source: detnews.com

Add a Comment

Comments (32)

Subscribe to comments
 Honest1 Honest1
Not Bad If This Can Be Achieved. But I Just Feel The Cars Of The Future Are Going to Be So Boring. I Think The Demands For Older Cars Will Increase. Especially the Ones Made in 1960-1980. When The Designs Were True. Not Based On Pedestrian Safety.
May 19, 2009 10:00 am
 p2c p2c
+1
May 19, 2009 10:22 am
 Lateknight Lateknight
Not necessarily. Compare cars of today with 7 / 8 years ago. They are more more efficient now than they were back then. Are they any less fun? (well, some are - but...) Efficiencies will come through lightness and weight savings, putting the grin factor back into a lot of cars. They will just be powered by smaller boosted engines instead of N/A V6 and V8 engines of today. Its all good still.
May 19, 2009 11:58 am
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
Lateknight, 7-8 years ago you could buy affordable lightweight sports cars, such like the Ford Puma, the Peugeot 206 S16/GTI, the PSA Saxo VTS & 106 S16. Currently the corresponding market gives us cars which are 50% more expensive, 25% heavier, and have boring handling.
May 19, 2009 2:19 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
They will be. It's unfortunate that stupidity reigns in such a big country.
May 19, 2009 4:38 pm
 Racketeer Racketeer
Not a challenge. A standard 911 Carrera PDK already achieves 6.7 l/100km (35 mpg US).
May 19, 2009 10:24 am
 AG4 AG4
911 Carrera PDK: 19 mpg city/ 27 mpg highway.
May 19, 2009 11:40 am
 scratchy996 scratchy996
true , it's no problem for a 911 Carrera to average 35mpg US , so by 2016 almost any car should be able to achive that. http://www.worldcarfans.com/9081217.019/porsche-911-carrera-achieves-42-mpg-with-pdk-trans
May 19, 2009 1:55 pm
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
AG4 is probably right, fuel consumption measures are tougher in US than in UE.
May 19, 2009 2:12 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
what does that mean , "fuel consumption measures are tougher in US than in UE" ? a car consumes what it consumes, with the same fuel it consumes the same in the EU or US. but i guess that's the problem , the fuel is not the same.
May 19, 2009 5:13 pm
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
scratchy996 please read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_automobiles#EPA_testing_procedure_through_2007 You'll clearly see that "legal" fuel consumption may highly vary depending on testing conditions & procedure, which are even different in US between 2007 & 2008. Fuel consumption testing does not consist in running a car on a rolling road at stabilized speed!
May 19, 2009 7:04 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
Targa_Florio , i was talking about fuel consumption itself , not the procedures used for measuring it, that's why i asked what do you mean.
May 20, 2009 9:29 am
 mnovakowski mnovakowski
Imagine "GM and Chrysler, who for too long indulged in building large, inefficient vehicles for (in fairness) a fickle public that demanded them" So it was a bad thing to build cars the public demanded? Are you kidding me?! Well don't worry Obama will make sure that will not happen again.
May 19, 2009 11:11 am
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
Development of any market and product is part demand fuelled, but also about leading the way and encouraging the uptake of new technologies. Give the market ONLY what it needs and we'd all be driving around in inefficeint death traps. I am not sure the public ever asked for greater efficeincy, safety measures etc.
May 19, 2009 12:43 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
The public largely asks for economic vehicles because society tells them too. You don't honestly think that the average bear is as knowledgeable on cars as us. The general public including Niche car buyers care about one thing, the lower price and what he can get for it. Thats it.
May 19, 2009 1:58 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
The public wants big cars, so they buy big cars. But then they complain because they have to spend so much money, and somehow get away with blaming the companies who make such big cars. Things like this are what lead to political idiocies. Obama is single-handedly destroying the passion of motoring. It makes me sick.
May 19, 2009 4:37 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
It can be done but most automakers are going to have to limit their super sport cars down to just one model, likely, maybe 2 but thats pushing it.
May 19, 2009 1:40 pm
 cbass79 cbass79
I think the European automakers are in advance, for expample the Seat Ibiza Ecomotive achieves 81.11 MPG.. http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090504.010/seat-ibiza-ecomotive-sets-a-world-fuel-saving-record-of-29-l100-km The Seat Leon Ecomotive achieves 62 MPG http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090303.020/seat-present-leon-ecomotive-concept-in-geneva I pry if there is any chance that Seat, Skoda and some other Europan brands will be available in the US in future, especially Seat could be successful in sales because of the hispanic people...
May 19, 2009 4:05 pm
 THERENAISSANCEMAN THERENAISSANCEMAN
that's more like it ! i think that the US can achieve that goal , they've been to the moon and back after all , haven't they ? now go and use your much-vaunted technology and focus it on something that ACTUALLY helps mankind .
May 19, 2009 4:29 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Does this only affect American motor companies or will this affect all cars sold in the US? If so, will firms like Ferrari and Lamborghini be allowed to exist in the US?
May 19, 2009 4:33 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
welcome to hybrid Ferrari and Lamborghini TDI !
May 19, 2009 5:17 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Well then let me be the first to congratulate Obama for ruining the automotive industry.
May 19, 2009 6:18 pm
 HEMI426 HEMI426
It's allways this weird thing that exectly the same cars have al better fuel economie with the EU messures. For example that new lincoln mks get 24 mpg on the highway, that's 10,2l/100KM!, if this was everage OK. With this number you could compare it with a BMW M5, that does also 24 mpg on the highway, according to EU fuel messures. It has 1.5 litres and 4 cylinders more!!!
May 19, 2009 4:55 pm
 HEMI426 HEMI426
What's more, are cars in the usa limited to 130 mph? For example a vw golf gti, in Europe it goes 146/150 mph, and a dodge ram 5.7, I mean with 390 hp, it should go faser
May 19, 2009 5:03 pm
 coopergt coopergt
There are already lots of fun cars that can reach those numbers,not a fun car but amazing to look at the new polo bluemotion, 85mpg! New GTI 38mpg,
May 19, 2009 5:09 pm
 NardoW12 NardoW12
so I guess luxury and high performance cars like Bentley and Ferrari will be facing a huge gas tax if they can't do 35MPG?
May 19, 2009 7:03 pm
 Renegade Renegade
No Automakers Meet Obama's New Fuel Economy Standard.Period. Now I guess we will all use bikes.
May 19, 2009 7:29 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Im with Dbhemhoras, Obama is inadvertently killing the motor industry. Maybe intentionally, i liked him but he's killing what i love. I like all car makes but can you imagine a world without real American sports cars like the Viper, the Corvette and the Camaro as well as the Challengers? They're different from the European and Japanese blends, im not saying better but amazing in their own way. This isn't just about those cars but the point is these standards are going to seriously crush what we love.
May 19, 2009 9:19 pm
 sensei sensei
How large a fleet does this new average apply to? I ask, because if it applies to every company evenly, small manufacturers like Panoz will be dead.
May 19, 2009 9:27 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Maybe they'll be exempted due to small size?
May 20, 2009 2:05 am
 wjaprep wjaprep
no more Escalades, no more Surburbans, no more Tundras, no more F350s...
May 20, 2009 10:05 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Nahh, you'll still see some. The F350s are Turbo diesel at least by option so they're cleaner fuel burning, may be exempt.
May 21, 2009 12:10 pm