2010 Corvette Grand Sport Revealed

2010 Corvette Grand Sport
2010 Corvette Grand Sport

Add a Comment

Comments (43)

 nedaznir nedaznir
looks like a 550 barchetta from the side
April 24, 2009 9:32 am
 nederina nederina
looks like a ferrari 550 barchetta from the side
April 24, 2009 9:33 am
 GRAVE GRAVE
Why they can't get more than 436 from the 6.2L?
April 24, 2009 9:47 am
 hata0101 hata0101
er...because they just can't! all kinds of technology are out there, GM just can't get any of them into their cars...their engineers are too damn lazy maybe...
April 24, 2009 11:17 am
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
Because it isn't a Honda lawn mower !!! Sarcasm apart, it would loose its Musclecarness if it had an M3-like engine. I prefer high-revving / high output engines but I can understand why some people like a burbling and torquey V8.
April 24, 2009 11:35 am
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
Well there is a 6.2L V8 with more horsepower. In fact 200 more. It's called the LS9, or more commonly referred to as the ZR1. In fact, it's in the top 10 in Nordschleife lap times. Also, you can find the 6.2 V8 in the CTS-V, the fastest production sedan in the world.
April 24, 2009 10:19 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
And the funny thing is, the CTS-V manages a ring time under 8 minutes! Something that the more fuel consuming R8 can't even manage.
April 25, 2009 1:47 am
 mnovakowski mnovakowski
Very nice. I'm happy to see GM make some moves like this. The Corvette's biggest problem is its image.
April 24, 2009 11:01 am
 hata0101 hata0101
well, no matter how hard it try, Corvette image won't change...it'll always the poor man's Farrari/ Porsche. a cheap american sport car with big block V8. it can't even "earn" (or i love to say "deserve")the same status of BMW M3 or Nissan GTR. no matter how hard it try...
April 24, 2009 1:52 pm
 FOXHOUND FOXHOUND
at least you live up to your name hata...
April 24, 2009 7:47 pm
 BabyMilo BabyMilo
I think its time for a new model
April 24, 2009 11:17 am
 Vlad Vlad
Those Silver Strips on the Front Fender Look Silly..... New model in the near future seems highly unlikely given the current scenario.
April 24, 2009 1:45 pm
 hata0101 hata0101
i lost count...how many models & packages available for Corvette?? 6.2L engine pumps out 430 hp? sounds like dinosaur to me. what's the displacement for M3? how about GTR?
April 24, 2009 1:56 pm
 FOXHOUND FOXHOUND
lol, you never fail to disappoint hata...
April 24, 2009 7:51 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
@hata: You really are ignorant. A Corvette is not a poor man's Ferrari. It's a Corvette. It's fast, good looking, and the fact is there really is no reason to buy three times the price for a Ferrari other than sheer preference. You're the perfect example of someone who perpetuates this poor image. Simply accept the fact that the Corvette is a very good car, a great car once you factor in the price.
April 24, 2009 10:33 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
Yet it still gets better fuel economy then anything else in it's power range. Weird no?
April 25, 2009 1:48 am
 hata0101 hata0101
@dbehmoaras - are u kidding me? have u ever take a claser look or even sit in side a farrari, porsche, or even a BMW? try compare the build quality & materials between them with the corvette, u know why i called it a poor-man's farrari. it may be a good cheap sport car, but not great, not even earn a title "world class". face it, back to reality, would ya? compare corvette with exotics? don't make me laugh...
April 25, 2009 2:45 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
First of all, yes I have sat in all of them. I have a BMW, I've driven a Porsche, and I have ridden in a Ferrari. Have you ever sat in a Corvette? The fact is, while all of those things are very nice in the Germans, they're ornamental. I'm talking about performance and engineering: 0-60 in 4.1s, top speed 190mph, all the while managing double the fuel economy that its German counterparts can manage? The Corvette stands out. With the same performance as a F430, twice the fuel economy, a third of the price, and looks very good, the Corvette is truly remarkable. The fact is that you don't need all of that fancy technology in a car if you're a good driver. And the interior in the Corvette is simple and very comfortable. You keep forgetting that it's not a Lacetti.
April 25, 2009 9:33 pm
 Renegade Renegade
Hey, not all the people have over 200.000$ to spend it on a Ferrari, and in my opinion BMW interiors are really ugly and boring.
April 26, 2009 9:14 am
 hata0101 hata0101
@dbehmoaras - don't fool me please, i don't even believe u ever sit & drive in a BMW, don't tell me u did & drove porsche or ferrari b4. i'm sure 99% of people will "amazed" by those cars after they have "experienced" them. i believe u don't even drive & sit in a corvette ever. don't tell me those "performance figures" i can get from car magazine. u sounds like a kid still living in mom's basement. wake up kid, what i've said was, corvette will never "earn/ deserve" a same status of those exotics from germany & italy, not ever have a same status like M3 & GTR. period. & please come out from mom's basement & back to reality from your wet dream with corvette.
April 27, 2009 1:07 am
 N20_Purge N20_Purge
I was thinking it was an American-ized Ferrari by the looks of the side profile.
April 24, 2009 2:18 pm
 harshreality harshreality
Seriously.. they even needed a supercharger to get over 600 hp for the ZR1..
April 24, 2009 8:06 pm
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
So? Who cares if it has a supercharger to get a 638bhp? Did you know that the 6.0 V12 in the oh so glorious, oh so overrated, Benz --65 engines requires not one, but two turbochargers? In a V12?
April 24, 2009 10:23 pm
 harshreality harshreality
So by your logic in 10 or so years the Corvette will have a 28 liter engine pushing out 550 naturally aspirated horses? Yeah sign me up for that! Who cares about a Merc V12? Mercedes was never a leader in engine technology. Give Ferrari 6.2 liters and Im sure they will come up with alot more than 638 hp without forced induction. No wonder GM is about to go under..
April 24, 2009 10:42 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
That same ferrari engine will consume twice as much fuel, cost 10 times as much and be 10% as reliable as the ls engine.
April 25, 2009 1:50 am
 harshreality harshreality
People who buy these kind of cars dont care about fuel consumption, nor do they care about getting 200,000 miles out of them. As far as cost goes? Do you know why Ferrari, Porsche, Lamborghini charge what they do for their cars? BECAUSE THEY CAN. Porsche and Ferrari make huge profit margins on every car they sell(particularly Porsche) Just because a Ferrari sells for 200K doesnt mean it cost 200K to make.
April 25, 2009 6:59 am
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
So are you saying that Ferrari is better because they charge you much more for a car that is much more expensive to fix? What I was saying was that even though the Vette may not have super awesome hp/liter ratio, it more then makes up for it in having a super lightweight large displacement engine that gets the fuel economy of a much smaller engine. There really is no reason why a smaller engine is better if it just rev's higher, brakes down more is more expensive to fix and sucks more fuel then a larger displacement equally powered engine.
April 25, 2009 7:21 am
 harshreality harshreality
Joe Limon you really must think the world is running out of gas soon with your extreme concern over fuel consumption. My point about the price is that Porsche and Ferrari will only sell for what they think people will pay for their cars. Your statements that high tech, small engines making high specific hp are unreliable is such an ignorant statement.. Honda have been making these for years..
April 25, 2009 10:47 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
My concern over fuel economy is based on the fact that the main concern people have with larger displacement engines is that they consume more fuel. The HP/Liter ratio is so useless, it doesn't tell you how high tech an engine is, it merely tells you if it can rev high or that they are using lots of boost. And in general most people that use the HP/Liter ratio, conclude that the smaller "more high tech" engines give you the biggest bang for the least amount of fuel, which is what I am stating is a fallacy. The LS engine is far from barbaric, and the day that everyone laughs at the HP/L ratio will be a very informed day indeed.
April 26, 2009 9:39 pm
 harshreality harshreality
So you are telling me that an engine that makes the same power as an engine twice its size is not a sign of technology or engineering? Do you really think people who buy Corvettes(much less Ferraris or Porsches) really worry about the gas mileage they would get? Seriously answer these questions Im asking.. I really dont care how big the engine is, but seriously.. if you need 6.2 liters to get only 430 hp and you wonder why people are not buying your cars then maybe you should go bankrupt.
May 5, 2009 11:07 pm
 AMGBrabusMercTuners AMGBrabusMercTuners
to all of you who are puting the corvette down for needing so much displacement for is power output the corvette's engine is a push rod desighn (ohv), this is a very old desighn that most car makers ditched when ohc & dohc came along. Is is harder to make power from an ohv engine than a similarly sized ohc engine. thats why ferraris and such which use ohc engines make so much more power for there displacement
April 24, 2009 11:19 pm
 davethepetrolhead davethepetrolhead
Just thought i would point out that OHC is not exactly shiny new technogly OHC been around since pre 1920s.
April 26, 2009 4:03 am
 scratchy996 scratchy996
Americans like to look at a car's quarter mile times , for that you need Torque over Horsepower. big V8s are cheap and provide a lot of torque , so it's the obvious choice for a car like the Corvette.
April 25, 2009 8:14 am
 radmeister radmeister
Regardless of how great this car may be, it is still over priced. The interior is a joke, up until 2005 it had the same dash as a Sierra Pick-up truck...It's a sweet ride, better than a viper. But it is what it is a GM, with GM quality. And it's not cheap either. So at the end of the day just like 99% of the world id spend my $ on a porsche or a M3 convertible. It's not just about performance, at the end of the day the ride is uncomfortable, the build and materials are low quality. Joe im sure if u had the $$ to buy a vette you wouldn't. People that buy these cars buy them for fun, and if you have enough $ to drop 70gs on a car for fun i'm sure you dont care about fuel economy and you have another 30gs to get a proper sports car. At the end of the day anyone that buys a vette settled for it, they still have a poster of a ferrari or porsche in their garage. Ask any vette owner if they got offered an F430 for their vette would they trade? All of them will say yes..so which is the better car?
April 26, 2009 4:15 am
 davethepetrolhead davethepetrolhead
If i use your same lame theory i'm guessing anyone who's buys an Audi R8 settled for it offer them the same F430 you mentioned or a Gallardo they would jump @ the chance.
April 28, 2009 3:51 am
 radmeister radmeister
Oh also to add, you can get a nice Aston Martin V8 Vantage for 100k...There is just soo much out there to settle for a vette. Only way id buy a vette would be in the hypothetical situation someone was holding a gun to my head and said you HAVE to get a 2 seater sports car, has to be new, and you only have 80k. Which never happens in real life.
April 26, 2009 4:19 am
 AC AC
Corvette has always been about performance, not the stitching on the seats (why don’t you get a Bentley?). The ’69 Corvette was as fast as a Testarossa that came years later. Funny that the car that's whole image is ultimate sport scar (the Ferrari Enzo) gets thrashed by an old pushrod V8 around the Nurburgring just to add insult to injury Corvette whips them year after year in the GT1 class at Le Mans with the same old engine. You think technology is the important thing, but you are actually mistaken with development (example Porsche flat six). Technology is what you brag to your friends about, development is what wins races and develops a proud history like Corvette has build over the years.
April 26, 2009 4:41 pm
 radmeister radmeister
If it's only about performance then the Ariel Atom is the best, faster than anything out there, and at 60k US it can't be touched...Everyone uses this excuse oh its about performance, but i argue that it's about an entire package and driving pleasure. If you want pure performance there are MUCH faster road legal cars for less $$ than the Vette.
April 26, 2009 10:40 pm
 harshreality harshreality
Wow what an ignorant comment. Do you really want to compare Ferraris racing history with Chevy? Hahahaha! So a 7 liter engine barely beating a 4.3 liter engine is something to be proud of? Its like a 10 year old fighting a 5 year old and barely winning but then goes and brags about it to everyone. Why doesnt GM/Chevy ever compete in racing series where they limit engine displacement? For instance Formula 1?
May 5, 2009 11:16 pm
 Prince_Ash Prince_Ash
hmmmmm honestly its like dbehmoaras said, the corvette is a corvette. accept it for what it is. but! i still think the corvettes body should change to fit the presents sleek sporty feel and style.
April 27, 2009 11:40 am
 AC AC
Harshreality you are the one that’s showing your ignorance and the fact that you are uninformed. Chevy dominated Indycar with its 2.65l engine. So I can live with the fact that Corvette is like a 10 year old and F430 like a 5 year old (after all it is at least 12 seconds a lap faster around the Nurburgring). The relation is fitting. Also see: jalopnik.com/5149839/this-1963-corvette-is-the-fastest-street+legal-car-ever -
June 13, 2009 7:05 pm
 AC AC
You don't care about the fuel consumption, the reliability, how much it costs, why do you care about the displacement. 2006: "this week in Germany, the heart of the C6.R, it's LS7.R motor, was recognized as Global Motorsport Engine of the Year by a jury of 50 race engine engineers". You must be a genius, to know more than 50 race engineers.
June 14, 2009 8:54 am
 sc6 sc6
Ummmm I smell jealousy!!! I for one know what its like to own, drive, and work on corvettes. Lambo, maserati, ferrari, porsche all crap!! Save your money if you can even afford one and buy a life. my Vette pushes over 700 hp with heads, supercharger, and custom cam. SMOKE all those crap cars with fuel and cash to spare.
July 23, 2009 2:08 am