BMW 760Li & 760i Revealed with Newly Developed 6-Liter V12 Twin Turbo Engine

Features 400 kW (544 hp) and 750 Nm (553 lb-ft) of torque

Add a Comment

Comments (66)

 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
Is a version of this engine going into the RR4?
April 9, 2009 10:21 am
 caraddicted caraddicted
performance is perfect : 4.6 0-60,544 hp also efficient : 155km\20liter with a V12 6.0:D
April 9, 2009 10:48 am
 BENZian BENZian
...they only thing is that the Benz V12s have owned this segment since...well forever...but most importantly since the introduction of the twin turbo V12s beginning in the 90s...BMW is rather late to the game...
April 9, 2009 11:10 am
 M M
Don?t worry BENZian they'll manage to exceed and excel, I guess they already have done that with this model!
April 9, 2009 11:21 am
 mmr66 mmr66
2nd only to the S600
April 9, 2009 11:22 am
 dbehmoaras dbehmoaras
No it isn't.
April 16, 2009 2:57 am
 Lutzie Lutzie
Yes... big Beemers have never quite cut it against the peerless S-Class.
May 10, 2009 4:28 am
 ubercool ubercool
Oh my god, that front end looks worse every time i see it, i've seen farm animals which are prettier than this fat sow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 9, 2009 11:40 am
 ubercool ubercool
The stitching on the roof lining is poor, a blind person could do a better quality job than bmw!
April 9, 2009 11:45 am
 benz_man benz_man
This must be a pre-production photog car. I can't imagine BMW letting its interior supplier(s) get away with something so obviously flawed.
April 9, 2009 1:39 pm
 ubercool ubercool
The steering wheel is ugly aswell, looks like it's from a another era.
April 9, 2009 11:47 am
 kimbo kimbo
have you ridden 7-series? I did and I love the interior. Steering wheel is perfect, quite small, but it gives some sporty feeling. The interior really is amazing, so classy and modern with high, lexus like quality feeling.
April 9, 2009 11:55 am
 Windtalker01 Windtalker01
Huh..... the steering wheel is ugly.... Then I must say the new S-Class and E-Class steering wheels are 10 times more uglier than BMW!!!
April 9, 2009 3:27 pm
 500lbman 500lbman
All this new technology designing a brand new 6.0L V12 and it basically matches the 5.5L S600's performance. Oh, but it gets a couple of more miles/gallon. If you can find me a V12 owner that cares about fuel economy I'll give you my life savings :)
April 9, 2009 11:49 am
 isaacu isaacu
Until now, BMW were very brave not to offer a "500 bhp" flagship despite obvious pressure from competitors. Finally, they've "bitten the bullet" and their rivals will "rest less easy". This is a fine flagship. isaacu
April 9, 2009 12:34 pm
 Samuel_spektor Samuel_spektor
Let's not forget that although the S600 and 760 compete in the same segment the BMW is using a 6.0 liter twin-turbo V12 while the car from daimler uses a 5.5 liter twin-turbo V12. However, there is an S class that uses a six liter twin-turbo V12 and that is the S65. The 6 liter monster in that developes 604 BHP and 738 ft-lbs of torque. Merc really does rule the twin-turbo V12.
April 9, 2009 1:07 pm
 AG4 AG4
Yes, but the S65 AMG does not compete with this. Another way to look at it... It takes a more expensive AMG performance model to beat the "regular" V12 7-series model.
April 10, 2009 12:45 am
 Zero Zero
Well, there's another way of looking at it; BMW needs to do more to try and smash the S600's foothold in this market. BMW has come to late in the game to make any real difference, and whilst these vehicles will be good, they will probably not tempt people away from the S-class, and will have a harder time tempting those who own or are going to purchase an S600. The engine in the BMW is good, but the 5.5 litre engine Mercedes still uses, produces the same power but alot more torque (830 as opposed to 750 Nm). That extra torque is a major advantage to the S600. And remember, this engine has been around for years, and uses "old technology" such as SOHC and 3 valves per cylinder. The BMW engine, which is new, full of technology can only manage to equal the Mercedes' V12 on power alone. This is particularly poor for BMW, whose engine also has a 0.5 litre displacement increase.
April 12, 2009 10:49 am
 HEMI426 HEMI426
This could be the best car in the world, better than an s class. But I don't see the piont of the 2 turbos, and I think that the old 6.0 v12 could easely make more hp for example bmw has a 3.0 six inline that can make without turbos 272 hp, so dubble that and you allso have 544 hp
April 9, 2009 1:19 pm
 hell666 hell666
Benz will always rule the TTV12 segment, the BMW may make 20kw more, but to get to those extra KW you have to rev to 5000 rpm. Benz's torque however, is full on from 1800-4000, therefore can use it's 80nm more earlier. Not to mention the design of this 5.5 V12 is very old now, using a relatively simple SOHC fuel injected 3 valve design without VVT, compared to the direct injected DOHC 4 valve "infinite double-VANOS camshaft adjustment" super high tech BMW. The problem is, this engine will never be at home, as BMW builds engines that love to rev and wring every last HP out at a high redline. Hardly a 7 Series driver. I'll take an S600 over this, and an S65 over that.
April 9, 2009 1:31 pm
 ShinyG ShinyG
How do you know how the 760 behaves as a result of its torque curve? Are you an insider? :p I'm pretty sure the engineers who designed this engine were aware of the target audience and made sure the car delivers smoothly throughout the rev range. Remember BMWs N/A engines are famous for their smooth torque delivery on the big saloons so my guess is the turbo version will be even better. They would have a tough time making the engine have as much torque as the MB V12, but I thrust BMW's engine department. They are pretty much the best in the world!
April 9, 2009 2:18 pm
 lucifa lucifa
Lol at how ShinyG would thrust BMW's engine department. Brand loyalty taken too far? ;)
April 9, 2009 2:52 pm
 ShinyG ShinyG
Maybe you can give me a reason why NOT to thrust BMW's engine dep. In other words: name one bad contemporary BMW engine in terms of performance and describe how that affects this discussion.
May 7, 2009 12:32 pm
 khd khd
great engine, great g-box (if it works), great car luv the interior too... looks good in white (suprisingly). this shoud definetly stir up the luxuary V12 segment. just think in 5-10 years time this thing will be around 10k or less second hand (if previous trends follow)...
April 9, 2009 1:32 pm
 Siawa Siawa
For me, it fails to deliever business look from exterior... I mean look at it's core competitors: S-Class n Audi A8 Interior is finally decent and not boring like rest of BMWs.
April 9, 2009 1:36 pm
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
Probably a very good car and an excellent & smooth engine but... WHAT AN UGLY PIG !!! I'm missing the E38 from 94 to 01, it was a bit anonymous yet very classy, like most BMW of that time
April 9, 2009 1:38 pm
 benz_man benz_man
I'm obviously a Mercedes fan, but I'd definitely take this 760 over the updated S600. This is just the better product.
April 9, 2009 2:03 pm
 DSC_OFF DSC_OFF
Yeah all that extra hp and torque on the S65 gets it from 0-60 faster by 0.1 seconds. The five speed transmission isn't helping. I bet the bimmer would run circles around it in the handling department, all for 50K less.
April 9, 2009 3:35 pm
 GermanCarsRule GermanCarsRule
6000 ccm 554 hp 750 NM 0 - 100 km/h: 4.6 sec 12,9 l / 100 km ? ENGINE OF THE...WOLRD!!!
April 9, 2009 4:18 pm
 Swifty Swifty
Mercedes-Benz S65 AMG: V12, 6000ccm, 612hp, 1000Nm, 0-100: 4.4s 13,6L/100km God among engines
April 9, 2009 5:47 pm
view more comments