Henderson Willing to Take GM into Bankruptcy to Meet Obama Mandate

 Henderson Willing to Take GM into Bankruptcy to Meet Obama Mandate
GM CEO Fritz Henderson

New GM CEO says he understands the demands for restructuring coming from the Obama administration

GM is finally sobering up.

The Obama administration's tough stance on providing more bailout funds for GM has chastened the troubled Detroit automaker and now its new CEO, Fritz Henderson, has conceded that the automaker will have to undergo a drastic restructuring that may include bankruptcy proceedings.

According to reports, the Obama administration foresees a much smaller GM operation than the automaker had been willing to accept under its previous CEO, Rick Wagoner, who was forced out on Monday. On Tuesday, Henderson said GM will abide by the administration's demands for restructuring, even if that involves a bankruptcy declaration. "So, if we can't do it out of court, we'll do it in court," Henderson said in a press conference, his first as CEO.

Bankruptcy would allow GM to expedite its restructuring plans and provide it with the power it needs to renegotiate labor agreements and obligations with bondholders who hold some 27.5 billion US dollars in unsecured GM debt.

But Henderson is hoping just the threat of bankruptcy will give GM leverage with the UAW, the union that represents auto workers, and with its creditors. His primary focus will be on a turnaround that avoids bankruptcy and gets the company back on a track to profitability as quickly as possible.

Henderson said he understands what is being asked of GM by its bailout benefactor, the US government, and is willing to make the tough choices his predecessor wasn't.

"Go deeper, go harder and go faster. We got it. We understand exactly what that means," he said.

Source: Autonews

Add a Comment

Comments (15)

Subscribe to comments
 Renegade Renegade
There you go, GM fans can thanks comrade Obama for this.
April 1, 2009 1:26 pm
 sensei sensei
Typical moronic American statement - blame the guy trying the fix the mess rather than the actual people responsible for the problems. Since think Obama is the problem, there is no sense trying to inform you of the reality of stupid GM incompetent management for the past 30+ years running that company into the ground. You just want to hate Democrats no matter what. Damn the facts.
April 2, 2009 12:07 am
 effington effington
thats what she said! im sorry it had to be said... but this is really quite good news... someone is willing to actually be in charge of the change in that GM nightmare... good things to come?
April 1, 2009 1:27 pm
 effington effington
in relation to the last statement of the article btw..
April 1, 2009 1:28 pm
 AndareVeloce AndareVeloce
I hope Fritz has a better taste for cars than he does neckties.
April 1, 2009 2:20 pm
 Renegade Renegade
Yep, that tie it's probably the ugliest I see.
April 1, 2009 3:47 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
This is a start in the right direction.
April 1, 2009 2:34 pm
 MAB MAB
And yet, the UAW will piss and moan about how this is unfair, how they stand up for the little guy, and all their usual BS. Once they admit to the fact that they are the ones who ruined the U.S.'s Big Three by turning them into health care companies, the better off everyone will be. Bankruptcy is severe, but imo, absolutely necessary.
April 1, 2009 2:47 pm
 500lbman 500lbman
Amen Brother
April 1, 2009 3:22 pm
 captwhizbang captwhizbang
Well, I have to say it atleast sounds like something is going to happen, good or bad , you have to admit there was no chance of them saving themselves when this all started last year, the fact that its been allowed to drag on and on is in itself a joke. President Obama is finally getting tough on companies asking for help, too bad he wasnt this hard on all the banks and mortgage companies, why weren't their CEO's publicly flogged? When is he going just come out and say what needs to be said to the Unions? I bet he lets GM be the Union breaking fall-guy, that way he doesn't have to answer to the "working class Joes" that got him elected.
April 1, 2009 3:00 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
He wants to be re-elected. Coming straight out against the unions will lose him a lot of votes in 4 years.
April 1, 2009 3:53 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Ha, if you think bankruptcy will do much to the union you are mistaken, at the end of the day the union still has the power, and so the bondholders. Ok so they file for bankruptcy and they re-negotiate the wages and benefits, the thing is that that's going forward and not going to change legacy payments and such. Also the union is a separate entity just because GM files for bankruptcy it doesn't mean the union is disbanded, they could very easily go on strike, and right now with the way GM is losing $ they can't afford a strike and the union knows this so they wont bend too much on the contract. On top of that restructuring isn't going to be cheap, all salaried employees will get their pension paid out + severance(about 2 weeks pay for each year worked) the union will get pretty much the same thing with minor differences. The union and bondholders still have the upperhand chapter 11 or no chapter 11. And Obama knows this, and he won't accept a restructuring plan based entirely on screwing over the union and closing plants down. He will force them into Bankruptcy, restructure them, and then force them into a merger with another company. I mean doesn't anyone wonder why nobody has bought GM yet? 52% of the company shares are public with a market value of 1.18Bil, porsche could buy a controlling stake on one month's profits...The way i see it GM is dead, no restructuring and no lower wages is going to save them, to put it simply they owe 177billion $ and have only 91billion in assets, anyone with half a brain can see it's a bad investment.
April 1, 2009 8:05 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
You're a funny one Radmeister, at least I agree with you now that you are blaming the UAW. If gone bankrupt the US government still hasn't confirmed that they will supply GM with any more additional bailouts. What I have interpreted is that the Obama administration is looking for is a sustainable company. If the union doesn't back down then the union will have failed and will lose all of the jobs (this would be a GM non-existent future). As much as my personal dislike for union's in general, I still realize that their bottom line goal is to give their workers the best possible outcome. No jobs or retirement payments is a far greater evil to the union then jobs with no benefits.
April 1, 2009 11:32 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Here is the thing, Obama cannot do or say anything to the union. Seriously what kind of image would that give off, here we will use taxpayer $$ to bail out the banks that screwed us, then use taxpayer $$ to bail out ancient automotive dinosaurs, THEN take the dinosaur's side and force the people that bailed them out to work for less? NO i don't think so. The union realizes this, they also realize they have the right to strike and unless Obama declares martial law he can't force them to go back to work. Don't get me wrong they WILL make some sacrifices to wages and benefits, but they won't be that ground breaking. Not enough to save GM, at this point i don't think their sales cover operating costs excluding labour ie. property tax, water, electricity....How do you get around that?
April 2, 2009 1:33 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
Well if they don't make concession enough then they will all be out of work radmeister, and that is the simple fact you keep neglecting.
April 2, 2009 2:31 pm