Obama Denies GM and Chrysler Extra Funds
GM given 60 days to prove its viability, Chrysler has 30 days to hammer out an alliance deal with Fiat
By Alex Ricciuti
March 30, 2009 4:04 PM
Filed Under: American, Chrysler, Corporate/Financial, General Motors
The Obama administration will be presenting its bailout plans for the US auto industry today, but the Financial Times is already reporting that there will be no new loans for troubled automakers GM and Chrysler - at least, not as of yet.
The Presidential Task Force for the Auto Industry has made its recommendations to the White House and it appears that both GM and Chrysler have failed to meet the administration's requirements for further help. GM will be given 60 days to once again prove its viability and get restructuring concessions from autoworkers and bondholders to reduces their costs and debt. Chrysler will get 30 days to solidify its alliance deal with Fiat and demonstrate that any financial aid given will remain with the company and be invested inside the United States.
The Obama administration is certainly getting tough with Detroit and is living up to its promise of not simply continuing to hand out money to cash burning companies. Although, the FT reports that the US government will continue to provide GM and Chrysler with operating capital, which may end up exceeding the additional 21.6 billion US dollars the automakers have asked for.
One issue that looms large is GM's unsecured debt. GM is being highly pressured to reduced the amount it owes in bonds. Bondholders hold about 27.5 billion in GM debt and are weary of GM's offer to swap that debt for equity in the troubled automaker. A condition of the bailout was that GM reduce that debt to 9 billion.
Sources told the FT that the Obama administration still believes GM can be restructured into a viable company but that Chrysler cannot survive on its own. The administration has been pressuring Chrysler to come up with an alliance deal with Fiat that keeps the company afloat and the bailout money invested in the United States. They have also added a condition, that if Fiat were to acquire more than 50 percent of Chrysler, then the loans would have to be paid back.
Related Articles
- GM to Cancel Some Chevy, Pontiac and Cadillac Models (25 comments
- Chrysler Bankruptcy Announced by Obama - CEO Nardelli to step down (7 comments
- U.S. Gov makes $285-million order for Detroit-made vehicles (11 comments
- Henderson Willing to Take GM into Bankruptcy to Meet Obama Mandate (15 comments
- Wagoner steps down from GM on Obama's insistence (39 comments
Comments
It's a shame for the honest people that work in the factories though
I'm not saying GM is more important than AIG, but a country's industry is at the very heart of its economy. You cannot underestimate what it would do to the US economy if GM, Ford, and Chrysler failed. And that thing you said, that it's only 3 million out of 300 million people... I recommend you don't say that in front of anyone that has lost or will lose their job because of GM's failing. Remember, it'll be 1 in 100 people and they might slap you in the face for saying that. If a company's failing increases a country's unemployment by 2% that's HUGE.
Bankruptcy means the purchaser is NOT saddled with the Debt, making the business viable: the Debt issue will be dealt with, but the Bond holders only get as much as they can sell off the company assets for... End of story.
About labor costs (benefits always mentioned as expensive): National single payer health care is the option to save money. No altruism towards poor people without health-care is necessary. Covering everybody is cheaper. Period. Less HMO beaurocracies, less clinic staff to negotiate between multiple Insurers, WAY more scale to negotiate the same (or better) deals on pharmaceuticals & equipment that impel US consumers to buy drugs from Canada/Mexico. This just implies that owners of Pharma/HMO stock aren't priviledged over the viability of the rest of the economy. Think that over.
And sure, one can say the Financial Derivatives industry had become 'crucial' to the entire economy (even though it's parasitic of the real economy). That doesn't lead to CONTINUUING TO EMPLOY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO CREATED THE PROBLEM, and putting them in charge of how the zillions of Government issued Money will be spent. One would think finding real economists and financial pro's WHO WERE AGAINST THE DERIVATIVE DEREGULATION in the Clinton years would be a good place to start for the new heads of these banks and financial casinos.
V8 Baby.
Add Comment
- JE Design Seat Leon FR Details Released
- Next Generation 2011 BMW M5 F10 Further Details
- Australian Skelta Racer Now Available in Europe
- VW Jetta TDI Cup Street Edition Announced (US)
- Hofele VW Touareg Royster GT 460 Widebody Introduced
- Shelby F-150 Super Snake Concept Unveiled
- Renault to Produce EV based on Twizy Z.E. Concept in Spain
- Ford Introduces First Inflatable Seat Belts [Video]






















