2010 Mercedes E63 AMG Sedan Spied with Exposed Rear End
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (20)
My god!
Audi is just a volkswagen with a different badge...
Audi will never beat Merc or BMW....
March 19, 2009 10:51 am
While Audi makes great cars (I had a flawless, yet kind of boring 2006 A6), with incerdible build quality and engineering...I don't think in my lifetime that Audi will be seen as "above" Mercedes or BMW. I think their quality on many of their models is higher than Mercedes or BMW, but the Audi name (especially in the USA) is not esteemed or looked up to.
March 19, 2009 11:13 am
Please, what's all this badge vanity? An Audi by any other name would drive just as sweet.
March 19, 2009 11:54 am
front looks a bit like the new 2009 accord, which i happen to own, lol.
but seriously i hope we're talking 560hp and up, cause lets face it the current e63 fell short of the e55 in torque and performance unless you were hitting triple digits and even then the m5 would reel it in
March 19, 2009 12:46 pm
European horse power race... any thing to make the world a hotter place, while the sea level rises and we will all have to move to the mountains in 20 years from now....
March 19, 2009 1:28 pm
Funny part is 570Hors RS6 is still slower then current E63 AMG. Audis are heavy very HEAVY.
March 19, 2009 1:54 pm
Funny part is 580Hors RS6 is still slower then current E63 AMG. Audis are heavy very HEAVY.
March 19, 2009 1:55 pm
"Way faster" is not exactly accurate. The 0-100 km/h times for both cars are exactly the same at 4.5. But, notice the large disparity in the maximum output of both vehicles; he RS6 has 580 PS, whereas the E63 has 514 PS. Reason for the same time? Weight. The RS6 weighs 200 kgs more than the E63. Because of that, they end having almost exactly the same power to weight ratio; E63 being 281 PS/tonne and the RS6 with 286. Small difference between the two, which has no overall effect.
The top speeds are also the same at 155 mph, but this isn;t reflective of the actual top speed. Without limiters, both cars would probably crack 200 mph. So, on paper the cars look pretty similar in the performance stats.
Out on the track, its probably a wholly different issue though. That weight in the Audi certainly won't help it.
March 20, 2009 3:41 pm
In my opinion i think Audi will have a better name then bmw in the next 10 years, mercedes still has its class but thats not going to last, audi is on a rise, and just like their add said "progress is beautiful" ive worked with a lot of cars, every bmw audi and mercedes and ive owned a audi a6 a bmw 335i cabrio and an m3 and a merc cls, which were all great cars but wen you look at audi they always improve to a better car which is the right thing to do.
March 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Jaguar's XFR is way hotter than this bland Mercedes, everything about the Jag is cool...
March 19, 2009 2:48 pm
everything?...how about technical gadgets? the merc is way better. this merc would be defenitly my dreamcar!!
March 19, 2009 4:26 pm
I seriously think that this 63, (if it only has 525bhp) is an interim car prior to the 'actual' twin turbo 63 due later, which is what Merc did in similar fashion to the 55' amgs when it first came out.
March 20, 2009 12:13 am
performance is not about horsepower..it's about the complete package...but hell..we still love to hear big horse power number !!
March 20, 2009 4:11 am
Imagine such a long engine sitting in front of the front axle in your RS6, hoping the next generation with v8turbo will compete this.
March 20, 2009 6:07 am
those wheels are amg they probobly just trew those wheels on for testing . they look similer to the 03 sl55 but it seems the rear end isnt soo agresive maby going for a more elagant look in imo. I love the e550 and and this car. Wouldnt expect for the horse power to be above the sl63 s63 cl63 not imposible but still wouldnt expect that
March 20, 2009 2:25 pm
Just saw one of these on my drive home in SoCal. Still had the tape marks on it from the hide panels. I have pics, including some of it running side by side with a current C Class . . .
First glance I thought it was a new STS!
March 19, 2010 4:36 pm









