Porsche Test Driver Fatality Follow Up

 Porsche Test Driver Fatality Follow Up
Porsche 911 prototype crash with fatality

Investigators have determined the cause of the Porsche prototype accident that killed the driver and destroyed the car was due to driver error. The Darmstaadt, Germany, prosecutor's office excluded excessive speed and technical defect as possible factors in the accident.

The 51-year-old engineer died from extensive bodily injuries after he lost control of the Porsche 911 cabriolet test car, and smashed into the barrier. The vehicle wedged halfway under the guard rail, and continued to slide for a considerable distance before coming to rest.

Darmstaadt's investigation concluded the convertible was traveling at a rate of 110 to 120 km/h, confirming a previous statement by Porsche indicating that the vehicle was not involved in a high speed test. At the time, witnesses had said the car was being driven at a rate of speed that was too fast for conditions. There is no speed limit for the stretch of road where the crash took place.

Porsche previously indicated that the deceased employee "was one of the most experienced test drivers." He had worked for Porsche for 25 years. The accident, which took place between Frankfurt and Heidelbarg on the A5 Autobahn, caused extensive damage to the Porsche 991 prototype. The cost of the crash is said to be in the "tens of thousands of Euro."

 

Source: swr.de

Add a Comment

Comments (10)

Subscribe to comments
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
This doesn't make sense. 120kph is hardly "excessive speed" unless there was thick fog or ice. But the road looks dry and conditions clear. And why no mention of what the technical defect was that also contributed?
March 18, 2009 1:20 pm
 skychao skychao
it says too fast for conditions. it might have been pouring rain or something, maybe foggy as you said? who knows what the conditions were. but the road looks dry but its hard to tell from pictures.
March 18, 2009 5:39 pm
 BrianWCF BrianWCF
bristol411s3, thanks for pointing this out. There was a translation discrepancy from the swr.de source. The story has been edited. Sorry for the confusion.
March 18, 2009 8:13 pm
 mlporsche mlporsche
yup..yr right no mention of tec fault....i was driving a 911 at a decent speed in india the road had a little puddle of water..i lost control..and there was no one around or no baricade so managed to get into control later
March 18, 2009 1:43 pm
 kimbo kimbo
the fact that 911's handle badly during controled(sort of) power slide isn't new. Sure enginners managed to make car handle better, but this first 911's genesis is still there. If you get serious traction problems in your 911 just escape the car as you probably wouldn't make it.
March 18, 2009 1:50 pm
 chris25 chris25
I still can't understand at that speed of 120 kph? unless the car had rear wheel drive or the TC is off or the brakes fail or something else....
March 18, 2009 4:23 pm
 kmayb kmayb
Ejector seats ! That's the answer. Get as far away from the "widowmaker" as you can when control is (too easily) lost. I still want one however.
March 18, 2009 6:19 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
the Japanese tried ejector seats for cars. not so good idea when you're in a tunnel.
March 18, 2009 9:13 pm
 Mol02468 Mol02468
Lol trust the japs to test stuff out in a tunnel
March 19, 2009 2:40 am
 Indian Autos Blog Indian Autos Blog
Loss of pressure in the brake lines? Driver fatigue? Steering system failure? You can rule those basic factors out when assessing an accident
March 19, 2009 1:38 pm