2010 Chevrolet Camaro Launched - Fuel Economy and Performance Figures Finally Released

Preliminary figures show the Camaro to be a contender

Add a Comment

Comments (15)

 Renegade Renegade
Finally......I bet that it's cold in hell right now.
March 17, 2009 12:06 pm
 4u2p 4u2p
The exterior looks badass, but the interior looks just bad.
March 17, 2009 12:56 pm
 Siawa Siawa
With you on that. It's just... wierd.
March 17, 2009 4:13 pm
 scratchy996 scratchy996
it's supposed to be retro and have a 70' style. just put a disco ball in there, listen to some funk music and get in the mood :)
March 18, 2009 2:56 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
Nice, the city mileage on the SS camaro it's almost as good as the R8's highway mileage... and it has 1hp more :P
March 17, 2009 12:59 pm
 MattAAron MattAAron
Mustang has been outselling the Camaro for decades... hence why they stopped production of the Camaro/FIrebird... wonder if this will turn that around? Would be great if it did (Own a 99 mustang myself!)
March 17, 2009 1:52 pm
 Moko Moko
not too bad of a car but i wish the interior were a bit more intricate
March 17, 2009 2:30 pm
 alessandro alessandro
Who was driving that like car, was it Starsky, Hutch or that other guy?
March 17, 2009 3:26 pm
 WildMaverick1200 WildMaverick1200
Oh yeah, now we can finally forget about the other fat and unsporty muscle cars. Finally muscle cars become again something to be proud of. Now, don't be a wimp, and order a manual tranny if you're buying it ;-)
March 17, 2009 8:43 pm
 Aesthetics Aesthetics
Fuel Economy and Performance Figures Finally Released why not Fuel Consumption and Performance Figures Finally Released
March 17, 2009 10:36 pm
 Aesthetics Aesthetics
E46 M3 fuel consumption; Test best/city 25.7 / 15.8 mpg compare to the v6 camaro, both 6 cylinders, only 400cc between each other. old m3 has 330hp, how much does the camaro has? weight should not be much difference between the two since the m3 is 1500+kg. i took the m3 as an example beause it was famous for high outputs yet had good fuel consumption for being a high performance car.
March 17, 2009 10:51 pm
 Aesthetics Aesthetics
if you really want to go high tech, porsche engineering. same 3.6, 6 cylinder, direct injection, although i am sure the 911 is lighter than a camaro, Combined/urban 29.4 / 20.3 mpg from 341bhp. the 3.8 911 has 385bhp, not far off the 6.2 v version of the camaro which is 400hp.
March 17, 2009 11:05 pm
 astroturf777 astroturf777
the only problem with this car is that it's so good it's coming to australia - and the stunning holden coupe 60 will never be built... for those who dont know, the camaro is on the same global rwd platform developed in australia for our commodore (imported by america as the pontiac g8). in the past, holden have sported a coupe model called the monaro (america again bought this as the pontiac GTO). the latest and most stunning concept was called the coupe 60 - but instead we'll get the camaro (no complaints really - just wish i could have both)
March 18, 2009 1:56 am
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
What you are saying is believable, but I haven't seen any proof that it is true. Could you link me off to a source? Nevermind, found a link. It's a shame that the GTO/G8 aren't selling well. This could very well be the first profitable "Commodore" in the states.
March 18, 2009 2:55 am
 DeRay DeRay
I love that Coupe 60 concept I wish it did go into production. It would've made the perfect GTO here in the states in my opinion.
March 18, 2009 10:50 am