Saab 10 days from bankruptcy

 Saab 10 days from bankruptcy
New Saab 9-3 SportCombi

Board of Directors in secret talks

Saab may be less than two weeks away from going belly up, according to parent company General Motors. GM asked the Swedish government for financial assistance to the tune of $568 million.

But getting the money from the Swedes will probably not happen. Swedish Industry Minister Maud Olofsson said neither she, nor the Swedish government, would bailout the company.

4,500 people work at the Saab Trollhaettan factory in the south of Sweden. Going bust would mean the loss of those jobs, and thousands more who work for suppliers that rely on the company.

GM requested the money to keep Saab above water long enough to seal a sale of the brand. Olofsson responded to this by saying, "The Swedish state and taxpayers in Sweden will not own car factories."

Olofsson puts the blame squarely on GM for Saab's current problems, saying GM concentrated on products people don't really want. She also said that if GM had been more innovative, and developed more fuel efficient vehicles sooner, they would not be in this mess. GM took a majority stake in Saab in 1990, and acquired the rest of the company ten years later.

Olofsson continued to say that Saab "has been running at a loss for so many years it would be irresponsible for me to stand here and say, sure, we are going to use taxpayer money in this way."

Saab's Board of Directors is reportedly in secret talks this week to discuss what to do with the company. They have the opportunity to file for reorganization, which allows them protection from creditors as they attempt to create a plan to make them profitable. As opposed to bankruptcy, creditors have to be convinced that a writedown of the debts they are owed is in their best interest. If they agree, they cannot attempt to force a liquidation. If they disagree, the reorganization process will halt.

Should they proceed with reorganization, they may sever legal ties to GM, and continue to press the Swedish government for assistance.

Source: upi.com

Add a Comment

Comments (13)

Subscribe to comments
 pzigly pzigly
It took a woman to finally say no to GM. The outcome may be bad, but sometimes tuff love is the way to go.
February 19, 2009 4:27 pm
 jandrews90 jandrews90
In one way i'm glad someone is finally letting GM suffer for it's own mistakes, on the other hand I hope SAAB will somehow come out of this and pull through, maybe from some random Indian investor even? lol
February 19, 2009 4:51 pm
 zdenda20 zdenda20
This is sad...SAAB make quality cars...I dont understand why the US cars (that - lets face it - suck) get the money, while a prospective branch of their company has to suffer:( Plus their new concepts were pretty cool and inovative!
February 19, 2009 5:11 pm
 saab99 saab99
This is truly a sad end to a company which at various points has offered a very attractive alternative to the major German car makers. The high point in design terms was the development of the 99 back in the late 1960's. This car was way ahead of its time, combining as it did the flair and innovation of Citroen with the strength and engineering integrity of the German makes. As a company they never lacked flair and a determined sense of difference which make them very appealing, which is why I have been buying them since 1975, or at least until the present model which is just too conservative to attract me. The central problem for SAAB has been their lack of profitability which has inhibited their ability to update and replace the models on a shorter time frame and introduce 4WD which would have been a logical introduction to the Scandinavian market. This core problem was only aggravated by the GM take over which tried to orient the maker to the conservative buying preferences of the North American market. Making their offerings bland had the effect of alienated their core following in other markets (look at the clamor for the return of a hatchback!). Since the public increasingly understood that many of the core components were GM they were also increasingly reluctant to pay a premium price for SAAB products, the more so since their very conservatism inhibited the innovations which would have enabled them to charge a premium price. I feel very sorry that this is the end of SAAB but the lesson is clear. You have to be innovative, appealing, profitable and offer a high level of perceived value to survive in an industry which is changing so fast and requires massive financing. I for one will greatly miss their passing. A quick read back through their truly great "Form and Function" books which explained the philosophy and innovation behind the 99, 900 and 9000 will give some idea of the quality of thought and design which went into these great cars. GM bought SAAB an extra decade, but never understood what was necessary in order to make it a profitable and innovative European brand. I wish all those associated with SAAB well and thank them for their contribution to automotive history. I have always been proud to be associated with the name and grateful for the pleasure you have given so many motorists. Thank you.
February 19, 2009 6:27 pm
 Iconic Iconic
God I hate GM. I can't they let such a coveted brand just rot away. Wagoner should be put in jail for this atrocity.
February 19, 2009 6:36 pm
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
Maude is spot on though. Gm has, for the main, brought this on themselves. Why should anyone not associated with the company have to pay for their mistakes?
February 19, 2009 6:46 pm
 Viking79 Viking79
My first car was a (pre-GM)Saab. Sure it was in the garage alot (Saab being an acronym for Stop At A Bank), but it also had a tremendous amount of character. I would be extremely sad to see this brand go under. Especially when it seems that the trade off is that GM duplicated many of it's craptacular vehicles (cavalier/cobalt, Suburban, etc) into identical vehicles with a different badge (sunfire/G5, GMC Suburban, etc).
February 19, 2009 7:37 pm
 DieselDog DieselDog
Way to go, Maud! I do not want to see my tax dollars (good money) being thrown to those who CONSISTENTLY MISMANGAGE their finances (GM, Chrysler, CitiBank, etc.) What a stupid idea! I agree that the companies should either shape up on their own and proove their mettle, or go cease to exist in current fashion. Soome savvy investor may take over. If so, great for SAAB.
February 19, 2009 9:14 pm
 wjaprep wjaprep
See what happens when American companies buy Europeans ones? I'm glad Mercedes escaped when they did, No American company should be allowed to any European car company. (someone save Volvo please)
February 20, 2009 1:14 am
 tbrodie tbrodie
It's easy (and popular) to blame GM. Opel seems to have done fine with GM and Saab borrows from their parts bin. I doubt Saab would have made it this far on their own. When GM aquired them, they only had two dated models. Their reliability was not stellar then either. The turbo was what saved them from the grave in the 80's. Front wheel drive is not a novelty and their price points, along with Volvos are not competitive with other European brands. These cars appeal to those who specifically don't want to buy German. I wonder what the Prime Minister had in mind. Saab's products are not less fuel efficient than its competitors. Maybe she thinks it should have been reinvented down market.
February 20, 2009 10:25 am
 GoneWithTheWind GoneWithTheWind
Saab designs are in still in the 80s, I agree with the minister, it was not about the money, it is about ending the shame in car industry. The following cars should be the only car supplyers for the human race for ever: Bentley Mercedes - Benz Porsche Nissan Jeep Lamborghini And if these are the only companies that supply automobiles, we will never see any losses, even these companies will be always busy and more jobs will be opened. regards,
February 20, 2009 3:43 am
 BabyMilo BabyMilo
NO not SAAB, i love SAAB this suks =(
February 20, 2009 4:31 am
 trekkerbin trekkerbin
If GM is doing such a bad job for SAAB, then SAAB should had gone long ago, instead, they statyed on the market for more than 15 year after GM acquire them. What I am try to say is that, SAAB has its own design ques, and they should have make the best use of it, not just blame everything to their mother company. I think that GM give them enough control for themselves. What is most important now is how to save SAAB from bankrupcy, and how to re-establish such legendary Sweden car company.
February 20, 2009 7:55 am