Aston Martin V12 Vantage Revealed

0-62 mph in 4.2 seconds and a 190 mph top speed

Add a Comment

Comments (12)

 lucifa lucifa
aston just doesn't do speed any more.. with a 1.3L and 4 cylinder increase translating to less than 100bhp.. not so great, to be blunt. and a 6.0L V12 producing 510? that's hardly monumental these days, methinks aston needs a new engine.. does look good, though
February 4, 2009 5:28 am
 AG4 AG4
True, and 0-62 mph in 4.2 seconds? The similar sized 911 GT3 can match that with a much smaller naturally aspirated 3.8 liter flat-6 engine! Isn't the Vantage supposed to be Aston Martin's true 2-seater sportscar model which is lighter and more compact than the rest of the Aston Martins? I guess its not light enough.
February 4, 2009 7:34 am
 BabyMilo BabyMilo
I think that Aston should get some new designers, its all well and good they make a nice looking cars but they all pretty much look the same, its getting abit boring.
February 4, 2009 5:47 am
 Beetle Beetle
They are getting as bad as porsche , "small minor changes"
February 4, 2009 6:28 am
Me thinks they need to borrow some AMG muscle....
February 4, 2009 8:53 am
 carcrazy1234 carcrazy1234
astons were about speed? since when.... its more like they were about class, style and definitely the SOUND produced by that BEAUTIFUL engine :)!!! you don't buy aston's for speed. not that i know of at least.
February 4, 2009 9:34 am
 lucifa lucifa
Beautiful engine? How about OUT-classed, OUT-gunned and OUT-matched in every dimension.
February 4, 2009 9:46 am
 jagervw jagervw
Hmmm, this car would go well with a trophy wife mentality...otherwise it is outclassed by the aforementioned 997 GT3.
February 4, 2009 2:27 pm
 Lemonsqweezer3000 Lemonsqweezer3000
Porsche runs circles around this with 6 cylinders
February 4, 2009 2:29 pm
 911fnatic 911fnatic
Hmm, looks like a crappy tuner got his mits on a pencil and attacked the gorgeous Aston lines. Those wheels look particularly cheap and aftermarket. Much rather the DBS than this if you're playing in this league of money.
February 4, 2009 4:32 pm