Mini Crossover: Insiders Reveal New Details & Frankfurt Unveiling Plans
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (9)
Yeah its a crossover allright. Between Skoda Fabia and something out of Scion, with a hint of Fiat Panda on the c-pillar.
January 29, 2009 6:51 pm
Yeah, I mean I dont blame them, they are just trying to capitalize a good idea, but do it with style, not like this.
January 29, 2009 7:04 pm
i think it looks abit london taxi-ish, but my overall opinion is bad, the clubman was fine that is a cool car but this just doesnt look like it.
January 29, 2009 9:05 pm
I think it's a great idea. Small Mini-branded SUVs have existed before. Even if they hadn't, a compact vehicle capable of taking on just about any road surface while getting around 30-33mpg highway makes a great deal of sense - plenty of outdoorsy people (bikers, hikers, kayakers, campers) need allroad capability but also don't want or need a large SUV. Few options exist if you need/want ground clearance but find high fuel consumption unacceptable. Not a single compact SUV sold in the US gets 30mpg highway without a hybrid system.
MINI has always been about providing a car that's smaller and lighter than its competition while providing exactly what its owners need, so I don't see any branding problem with this either. It's also smaller than a Golf in every dimension but height, so it'll be pretty tidy.
January 29, 2009 9:07 pm
"Small Mini-branded SUVs have existed before"
Really? What were they then?
I am not sure the Mini Moke counts as an SUV...
The BMW MINI has even less in common with the original Mini now.
January 29, 2009 10:32 pm
The Moke, of course - which doesn't count as an SUV, just as this lifted C-segment hatch doesn't.
As for having something in common with the original Mini - what exactly do you propose bringing back that the original MINI had but the current ones don't? These are small, fun to drive, and efficient without being a penalty box. They use space well and are good for urbanites. What else was the old Mini? What else do you really want to bring back - the tin-can structural soundness, shitty engine, or the ride that makes your kidneys hurt. Of course MINIs aren't as small as the original - if that bothers you so much, wait two years and buy the Smart-class MINI that's coming out then.
January 29, 2009 10:38 pm
I had a MINI Cooper S for 5 years and loved it. It was, of course, very different to the original Mini, but in many ways just the same, especially with its agility and kart-like handling. I can't see either of these attributes being easy to take into a SUV.
Whatever the original Mini was, it did its job very well. It was VERY fit for purpose. Arguably, the new MINI is very fit for purpose too in the modern climate. I just can't see the SUV fitting the same bill.
January 30, 2009 6:56 am
That's probably because you're not one of the people I was talking about in my first post.
"plenty of outdoorsy people (bikers, hikers, kayakers, campers) need allroad capability but also don't want or need a large SUV. Few options exist if you need/want ground clearance but find high fuel consumption unacceptable. Not a single compact SUV sold in the US gets 30mpg highway without a hybrid system."
There are a lot of folks for whom a very compact vehicle with good gas mileage and ground clearance, that's still very fun to drive for its class, is fit for purpose far more than a two-door hatch. It's not like this is a Suburban, it's the size of a Golf - still a size class that's very easy to make agile. And these days, even proper SUVs can handle well.
January 30, 2009 2:24 pm









