New Ferrari F60 'illegal' - report

 New Ferrari F60 illegal - report
New Ferrari F60 - Felipe Massa

Ferrari's newly launched 2009 single seater, the F60, has been declared "illegal" by a specialist German motoring publication.

Auto Motor und Sport said the car, revealed last week at the Mugello circuit in Italy, features rear exhaust outlets that contravene the sweeping new technical regulations.

The magazine said some of the Italian team's rivals have noted that because of the new rules cracking down on bodywork appendages like aerodynamic winglets, exposing the exhausts in the way the F60 is designed is not allowed.

A glance at the other new cars revealed so far - the Renault, Williams, McLaren and Toyota - shows that their exhausts have all been mounted in-board.

Auto Motor und Sport said it should not be too much of a problem for Ferrari to redesign the exhaust housing, but it may help to explain the team's retreat from the Portimao group test this week to Mugello.

Officially, Ferrari decamped to Mugello because of adverse weather forecasts for this week, but the magazine said the F60 also showed a significant problem with its front wing when tested last week.

It is suggested that, in light of these challenges, Ferrari concluded that it should be conducting the car's first major test as close as possible to its Maranello base.

 

Source: GMM

Add a Comment

Comments (10)

Subscribe to comments
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
I said when it first debuted that I thought the external mirror mountings also acted as aerodynamic appendages, so it woulf not surprise me to see Ferrari dragged up over those items too.
January 19, 2009 10:23 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Even though i am not a very big fan of Ferrari F1 i have to call out flamers on this one. This was done solely for going back to an oldschool look, i mean any douchebag can tell that these actually are bad for the aerodynamics because of their weird shape in relation to the body, they would cause turbulence. Covering them up would be simple and in fact would be more aerodynamic. Also ferrari has been pushing the regulations of F1 to the limits since the start of it, im sure they used every loophole and were very meticulous at it. Wouldnt get caught for something that obvious, like the exhaust pipes are the only thing that differentiate this car from the rest, so everyone would notice them.
January 19, 2009 10:56 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Im with Bristol here. Ferrari knows how to stretch the absolute limits of the rules or have FIA overlook them when they've gone past them. It doesn't matter though, we know this car will still hit the track is even if the exhaust mounting is technically illegal.
January 19, 2009 11:22 pm
 Kalos Kalos
Last time i checked 'Auto Motor und Sport' was not the FIA. If you take a close look at all the cars thus launched - they all seem to have one thing in common and that is a raised front nose. Then how come MacLarens nose looks to be set lower than the rest. Like i said this is just an opinion and we'd rather wait for the FIA to summon teams that are 'surfing' beyound the set rule boundaries.
January 20, 2009 3:14 am
 phobos phobos
yes raidmeister..actually exhaust pipes creates turbulence and more drag...but perhaps ferrari has something in their sleaves..as usual
January 20, 2009 9:24 am
 Get_real Get_real
yeah they have something up their sleeves... FIA rulemakers :-P
January 20, 2009 3:58 pm
 ivanadrive ivanadrive
No no, this ferrari isn't illegal, it's merely ahead of the new rules change :)
January 20, 2009 4:08 pm
 saripsr20 saripsr20
just remember...... the F1 wants Ferrari to join. =)
January 21, 2009 2:18 am
Firstly I am, and always have been, a fan of Ferrari so this might be baised. All team look to get the most of the rules, thats just F1 and why we all love it. I am not sure about the exhaust (maybe a solution to last years exhaust problem?) but i believe the mirror stands are legal, the rules state no aero devices OUTSITE the dimensions specified. All Ferrari have done is reduce the width ove the side pods and to make space for the stands..... nothing in the rules about aero INSIDE the dimensions specified?
January 22, 2009 3:09 pm