Chrysler 200C EV Concept Unveiled in Detroit

Add a Comment

Comments (22)

 bpab.ua bpab.ua
one more insignia ?
January 11, 2009 6:10 pm
 ivanadrive ivanadrive
That's a very handsome car. The rear is like cross between audi and bmw, but in a good way. The front looks like an insignia indeed, but better IMHO.
January 11, 2009 6:12 pm
 politz politz
WOW Who knew Chrysler could come up with this? Hot!
January 11, 2009 6:13 pm
 Motor_Yakuza Motor_Yakuza
Bring it, trow away the bad Sebring.
January 11, 2009 6:16 pm
 NISMO NISMO
I thought it was a last gen. Acura RL at first glance, but I'm very impressed that this came from Chrysler's stable.
January 11, 2009 6:22 pm
 WildMaverick1200 WildMaverick1200
One of the biggest manufacturer of gas guzzlers now's on EVs? I'm glad, I just hope they actually work.
January 11, 2009 6:23 pm
 Tuner_Mad Tuner_Mad
Looks like the Sebring mixed with the Insignia.
January 11, 2009 6:23 pm
 -Matt- -Matt-
i thought it was a rebadged insignia :O
January 11, 2009 6:30 pm
 paula1105 paula1105
it does look nice but i guess we've already seen it all. insignia.
January 11, 2009 6:31 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
There, this car is pretty nice and should shut up everybody who said Chrysler was going to waste the taxpayers money. They are making moves, this is a very good one.
January 11, 2009 6:55 pm
 tbrodie tbrodie
You mean like taking out quarter-million dollar thank you notes? It's great to see concepts.? I wonder how far behind the Volt this is.
January 11, 2009 7:46 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Before people want to buy american, The big 3 will have to improve their image. Being grateful is the best way to do so. However nothing is free in this world, so to get that word out about thanks, you gotta spend the money on advertising. You would be wise to realise these things.
January 11, 2009 10:28 pm
 Bristol411S3 Bristol411S3
This looks promising. I fear it may have come too late though...
January 11, 2009 7:31 pm
 FOXHOUND FOXHOUND
wow, now this is what chrysler should've been working on a long time ago, lets hope this is a first step for a brighter future for chrysler.
January 11, 2009 7:38 pm
 boyke69 boyke69
Wow, why can't they make the Sebring look like this?
January 12, 2009 1:10 am
 Tp Tp
i thought Sebring was a problem of quality, but this concept should bring the company a bit of hope, i more like its interior which is modern and cozy and more importantly "all organic and natural material" if it is real.
January 12, 2009 7:22 am
 MAB MAB
Given the size of the car when seeing it with a person sitting it, i'm guessing the next gen 300c (2011-2012?) will have a lot of this design in it. And if that can trickle down to the Sebring, even better.
January 12, 2009 5:24 pm
 avanthomme avanthomme
beautiful - i love the rear, reminiscent of the beautifullly sculpted 6-series rear and the awesome side and front, harking back the tasteful bentley continental... sexy
January 13, 2009 3:20 am
No, it is not like the Insignia, it is the design evolution of the Chrysler Nassau concept of the few years ago. Bravo Chrysler...!
January 13, 2009 2:44 pm
 wongnawa wongnawa
ohhhh cool!!! very sleek and modern yet retro at the same time!!! but i thought chrysler was going back to using the penta-star badge already. but i like this logo more, it's more american.
January 17, 2009 10:15 am
 sensei sensei
Definitely does not look Ameircan. FINALLY, Chrysler got rid of its 1970s-1980s hangers on.
January 25, 2009 1:14 am
 Han Solo Han Solo
I am totally in love with this car. Its just simply awesome. and the Technology, its a Plug In Hybrid (Serial Hybrid), but I dont understand one thing. Why is Chrysler using an oversized Internal Combustion Engine (2.0 litre) to power the Generators, when they can use something way smaller?? Correct me if I'm wrong guys, Since the wheels are driven by a 200 Kw (268 Hp) Electric motor powered by the Li-Ion batteries, the torque required to turn the Generators should be fairly small, lets say around 50 to 60 Nm. This can be achieved with a much smaller Internal Combustion Engine (lets say a 500 cc (0.5 litre) Engine or even less instead of the large 2000 cc (2.0 litre) Engine). Why consume more fuel than you really need to...?? I smell something fishy...
April 1, 2009 6:09 am