Jaguar XF-R Revealed

2010 Jaguar XFR

By Thami Masemola
January 10, 2009 12:40 AM
Filed Under: Detroit Auto Show, European, Jaguar

Official pictures and details of the new 2010 Jaguar XF-R have finally emerged. The executive British cat was designed to take on cars like the Audi RS6, BMW M5 and Mercedes-Benz E63/ CLS 63 AMG.

In order to play at this level Jaguar has provided a potent engine for the XF-R in the form of a 5.0-litre V8 with a whirling supercharger plugged into it plus an uprated 6-speed automatic gearbox. The engine produces 510hp (380kW) and 625Nm. In comparison the previous generation S Type R, the XF-R's spiritual predecessor, made 399hp (298kW) from its 4.2-litre supercharged motor. For this power the XF-R gives back a 0 - 60mph time of 4.7 seconds. Jaguar also did a 0 - 100km/h (62 mph) run which came back as 4.9 seconds on the clock. A combined fuel economy of 12.5l/100km (18.8mpg US) is stated by Jaguar.

In terms of specification Jaguar did not skimp on features for their new top-of-the-range XF. Wheels are 20-inch alloys coupled with larger ventilated disc brakes. A new body kit featuring wider side skirts and a bonnet with louvers gives the car a more purposeful stance even when standing still. There's a new front end with a shiny upper mesh grille and a black lower mesh grille. The XF-R also has a new rear spoiler and four round tailpipes. The "R" moniker placed on the four brake calipers as well as the rear end makes it clear where this car stands in the Jaguar hierarchy.

Interior comes with soft grain leather as standard, adjustable sports seats and a dark chequered aluminium trim on the dash. The "R" is also seen just above the glove box and at the bottom of the steering wheel. The XF-R will come with a choice of eight exterior colours including one called Salsa.

More of the Jaguar XF-R will be on display at the North American International Motor Show in Detroit.

 

Source: carscoop.blogspot.com

Comments

Tuner_Mad
January 10, 2009 12:48 AM
This new appearance steps up highly from the stock edition. Hope it drives as good as it looks.

eddie
January 10, 2009 1:09 AM
Most germans seem to make at least 100 horsepower/liter with normal aspiration. Why does a 5 liter motor need a supercharger to make 510 horsepower. It is like the new corvette zr1 it should make 600 horsepower without a supercharger for a 6 liter motor.

GmBHcarfanatic
January 10, 2009 10:20 AM
i dont understand your concern

AG4
January 10, 2009 4:33 PM
Unlike high reving naturally aspirated engines, the XFR's supercharged V8 can deliver 625Nm (461 lb.ft) of torque starting at a low 2,500rpm.

Among its competitors, only the BMW M5 uses a smaller displacement naturally aspirated high-reving engine. The E63 AMG uses a larger displacement naturally aspirated 6.2 liter V8 to get over 500hp, while the Audi RS6 uses twin-turbochargers.

cameroun
January 10, 2009 1:17 AM
the last picture is crazy nice o;

joshg_5
January 10, 2009 1:24 AM
If this car competes, it will be a tremendous vehicle.

I really hope Jaguar is able to do what it was unable to do under Ford management.

_M7_
January 10, 2009 1:48 AM
yep it should have at least 600 hp for that masive engine, it looks good but let see it on the track

swifthead
January 10, 2009 2:02 AM
huh i thought that this will at least beat the Caddy CTS-V and Germans but as it look now that won`t be possible

Bristol411S3
January 10, 2009 5:20 PM
Why not? You talk as if the only metric used by people who buy these cars is power. You forget that these people grew out of Top Trumps a long time before they could efford to blow £70K on a car.

Maestro
January 10, 2009 2:07 AM
AWESOME!!! Just one question though...why just 2010?? I don't think I can wait all year long...

BabyMilo
January 10, 2009 2:14 AM
nice, i like it... You probably wont be seeing too many in the street though *sigh*

khd
January 10, 2009 3:52 AM
nice car (but id still rather have an M5) i wonder if they'll do a XFR-S like they did with the current XK?

schnell
January 10, 2009 4:19 AM
yeah id rather have an M5 too but would buy this one for the mrs. That black looks sick! those wheels dont tho; that car with black wheels and tint would look amazing

michelin901
January 10, 2009 5:11 AM
sounds good but somehow the car doesnt look "R" enough. black paint tends to hide all the details and those wheels are terrible, look like hubcaps. an all white or dark gray with five spoke wheels would have been more presentable.

GmBHcarfanatic
January 10, 2009 10:21 AM
juguar is not a german car...... and is definitely NOT to be compared to a corvette.

lucifa
January 10, 2009 10:36 AM
if it's going to compete with the german power wars, 510 probably won't be much unless it's REALLY light.. rather an M5 too, but still, it looks nice

adottkiddy
January 10, 2009 11:45 AM
I thought it would have more power. At least 550bhp

adottkiddy
January 10, 2009 11:48 AM
And this car wont beat the new CTS-V, especially to 60 mph. The CTS-V does 0-60 in 3.9 seconds while the Jag does it in 4.7 seconds. Cadillac has improved on the new CTS-V, it can now rival the european high performers too.

lucifa
January 10, 2009 12:45 PM
yeah but the euro high performers are built to last and have nice interiors. that's where the price difference comes from

schnell
January 10, 2009 2:41 PM
yeah and if history repeats itself, jag (like bmw, benz etc) will be conservative in their 0-60 #'s (probably less that 4.7 secs) whereas chevy wont

radmeister
January 10, 2009 9:55 PM
Yeah like the SL-65 Black, they say around 3.9, if i had to throw a guess it would be closer to 3.1. I remember the brabus SL said 3.9 and it was 3.1 when they tested it. The audi RS6 should be around 3.5 if not lower. But this car is a combination for the stylish performance enthusiast. The german cars are for the techy performance enthusiast, winning over their customers with fancy technology that this jag cannot touch. But the jag has something the germans dont, an unbelievable style. Two completely different markets, no point in comparing them.

GmBHcarfanatic
January 11, 2009 2:17 PM
schnell this is for you... jaguar xf-r: a sport, 4 door sedan that can be used as a family car. main rivals: m5, e63 amg, rs6, etc. corvette: a sport, 2 DOOR COPE that is more oriented towards extreme competition of performance, more of a track car. main rivals: sl65 amg black edition, viper, m6....... so u cant compare this to the corvette. THE only car that can lie between the two niches is the cls!

NISMO
January 11, 2009 9:16 PM
The American cars with cheap interiors argument is getting very played out here gentlemen. Anymore it just comes across as a biased last resort when an American car is either a valid competitor or better than it's Euro, Japanese counterparts. Anything is built to last when it has the maintenance bills associated with European cars, whereas anyone with any experience with an LSX motor knows you can take it to a track repeatedly, beat the balls off it for the day, and drive it home like nothing happened. Granted the CTS-V is a bit off topic, but can we relax the over generalizations...after all, we're all adults.

ubercool
January 10, 2009 12:53 PM
Wow, simply awe inspiring car, million times cooler than any German offering. The best luxury sedan in the world for me.

ubercool
January 10, 2009 1:50 PM
Some very impressive technology under that sexy body aswell.

What is important to buyers in this segment is overall performance. Luckily, Jaguar didn't just drop in a new engine and call it quits. The paddle-shift ZF six-speed automatic transmission is beefed up internally to handle the extra grunt. Larger brakes and a quicker steering rack are used as well. More interestingly, the chassis receives some electronic tweaks. First, an active dampening system called Adaptive Dynamics is fitted. This is a more advanced setup compared to simple, two-step dampers in the outgoing XF Supercharged. The second bit of chassis trickery is even more interesting. It's called Active Differential Control (ADC) and is an electronically controlled limited-slip rear end. It utilizes an electric motor with a multi-plate clutch and can actively transmit torque to the wheel with the most grip. Jaguar claims that ADC offers increased traction while avoiding the negatives of a fully mechanical differential such as increased understeer. Jaguar says that in dynamic mode, the dampers are stiffened and with the stability control switched off, ADC allows controllable power oversteer and improved off-throttle stability...

Roger
January 10, 2009 1:53 PM
Too slow to compete with M5 and RS6

ubercool
January 10, 2009 2:46 PM
Roger - the Jag has equal power and more torque than the M5, more torque and the high tech diff will make the Jag pull faster and harder out of the bends than the Beemer etc...

AG4
January 10, 2009 4:37 PM
Yes, more torque available at lower rpm.

625Nm (461 lb.ft) of torque starting at 2,500rpm!

lucifa
January 11, 2009 2:36 PM
i'd say the jag would intially pull away from the M5, but as the bimmer gets into the high rev range it would start to pull it back

swifthead
January 10, 2009 6:02 PM
well E55 AMG and E63 AMG are both faster! Also CLS is faster with AMG engine! M5 it`s hard to say because with 507hp it is lower figure than Jag 510 but anyway the torque is that what makes the difference! if you think this could compare Audi RS6 then your are out of your mind...no way Jag is even near Audi RS6!

pups
January 10, 2009 6:11 PM
it looks alot nicer than germans :)

redshift
January 10, 2009 6:55 PM
would make a nice comparison test of the newest super sedans on the block: Jaguar XF-R vs Cadillac CTS-V

mmr66
January 10, 2009 7:49 PM
not giong t o be beter that the mercs that are mentioned above

ubercool
January 10, 2009 9:19 PM
Expect to see this Jag kick all the competitions arses!!!

BavarianMS
January 10, 2009 11:10 PM
I don't see anything impressive about this car. It certainly doesn't deliver anything by a 2010 release date.

GanSan
January 10, 2009 11:47 PM
The only gripe I have with this car is that the headlights look like Subaru's design. I don't care who had them first, I just think it cheapens the look in my mind.

plasma_cluster
January 11, 2009 12:55 AM
this thing cant even touch the german cars. m5 eats this for breakfast. and the current m5 has been out for years.

schnell
January 11, 2009 1:22 AM
I would rather have the m5, but can see how this thing might win some comparison tests (even though it might not match the M5 dynamically) just how the supercharged XF has beaten the E550, 550i, A6 etc in a few comparison tests and has beaten them out for some top ten wins

ubercool
January 11, 2009 11:28 AM
The Jag is dynamically better than the all of them, it has superior torque and technology over the M5(crap transmission), E63(ancient design) & RS6(nose heavy& 4WD)...

lucifa
January 11, 2009 2:38 PM
M5 has a crap transmission? around town yeah pretty much but if it's being thrashed it's a pretty decent gearbox

Francois
January 11, 2009 1:42 PM
It's better looking than M5 and E63, and maybe it will be faster. Can't wait for that engine in current XJR.

NISMO
January 11, 2009 9:18 PM
A refreshing option from the usual suspects.

wjaprep
January 17, 2009 9:07 AM
It looks alot better than the non "R" model, but it still looks pretty boring compared to the E63, M5, and S6, It's just not very exciting to run in the circle it tuns with.

JAGUAR-XF-R
January 31, 2009 10:16 AM
eddie every HP at jag counts not like the ZR1 and american cars u have to take 30% from they HP to get ur real power

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links