McLaren Tuned Dodge Viper Diamondback for Sale

Add a Comment

Comments (21)

 dmanero dmanero
sorry not interested, apart from being uglier than my sisters baby, but who the hell still wants to drive around a viper. Plus if Chrysler goes belly up, there goes you warranty whenthat engine gives up after a few high rev launches, and chrsyler is not know to have reliable cars, with is no waonder they are in trouble.
January 5, 2009 1:16 pm
 ShinyG ShinyG
Do you think anyone with the cash to buy this thing would be even remotely interested in warranty? Whoever buys this car will keep it in the garage until the "crisis" passes and then sells it for a nice profit! I'd say it's quite a good investment actually!
January 5, 2009 1:37 pm
 xLumino xLumino
Thank you dmanero, what a constructive and informative commention! Hm, I think, like Shiny said, it gives alot of profit when you are an intelligent businessman. But it will be also a beast to drive this car. And Viper are known for their wildness :)
January 5, 2009 1:46 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
actually ive talked to a man whose driven a wide variety of sports cars and then the track use ACR. he said around town while its not too soft on bums, it is very complacent for everyday use. 23mpg highway mileage doesn't hurt.
January 6, 2009 1:07 am
 Tuner_Mad Tuner_Mad
Wow, 615 horses in an American muscle. whoever thought this was a good idea is loco!
January 5, 2009 2:51 pm
 gmfan09 gmfan09
The Viper is not a muscle car
January 6, 2009 2:22 am
 _M7_ _M7_
looks nice and you can buy like 1000 Vipers whit development cost but I prefere a Murcielago than an american car
January 5, 2009 3:30 pm
 RobERob RobERob
The black on white scheme looks like it came from a bad episode of Pimp My Ride. This is perhaps the ugliest Dodge Viper I've ever seen. And trying to cheat that much power out of a low tech engine is a gamble I wouldn't be willing to take, McLaren or not. I'm mean Viper's aren't exactly known well for their reliability. And could someone at Chrysler learn how to design a sports car interior that doesn't look like it belongs in a less than 20k econo box? That where they should've put some of that $750k.
January 5, 2009 4:22 pm
 RobERob RobERob
Do you even know what you're talking about? Supercharged Gen III Vipers are getting over 700hp with stock internals. The new Gen IV engine is rated at 600hp stock. Tuners are getting upwards of 630hp with headers, high flow filters and cats. The Gen IV Viper engine is the first powerplant that feature variable valve timing with an in-block cam. Also, that same engine averages 22mpg highway. Everyone raves how efficient the European and Japanese engines are, but none of them make 600hp N/A horsepower and get that type of mileage. Finally, if you look real close you will see the car is not painted black and white. The black sections are actually unpainted carbon fiber.
January 6, 2009 12:49 am
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Haters, some are pathetic, you know who you are. The stock Viper is a gorgeous refined american sports car, almost a super car that beats cars that cost 3 times as much. This is even faster and better in all regards. How can the paint combo be ugly when the pieces in question only serve to make it faster. This is the car of my dreams. Don't forget that with all this performance the car is capable of at least 23mpg on the highway which is untouched by any of its europeans rival that have any performance that comes close to matching this. Your hate for this car is totally unfounded save for your personal bias against a true american sports car.
January 6, 2009 1:06 am
 RobERob RobERob
Sorry, but I'm going to have personal bias against any car that has to resort to using a ridiculously large 8.3 liter V-10 and with that capacity, only manages to produce 500 hp. That's embarrassing and talking about refinement in any Viper review is nonsense. It's uncomfortable, rough, and is visually disappointing especially when compared to its predecessor. 13/22 mpg may be a motivating factor for some when purchasing a "supercar" but it's not in my book. I want engineering, not old tech push-rods that can't rev. .
January 6, 2009 4:00 am
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
The Viper despite using old technology is mechanically refined. Why use an 8.3L V10 ? because it creates GOBS of torque and the engine is very under-stressed. It makes 600hp easy and is capable of doing so for extended hours on end as long as its cooled properly. The Viper could probably have a higher redline with todays advancements. It doesn't need it though. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Also rob....the ACR is COMPLETELY sold out. So buyers like you who want to spend extra money on cars that are actually slower are a minority. The Viper does everything well, from the track to the street. You just hate on it because its just a "Push-rod that doesn't rev". Even though its engine is what makes it so great in every single regard, fuel economy, horsepower, torque, durability etc etc etc etc.
January 7, 2009 12:06 am
 MTC MTC
It doesn't have the supercar "wow" factor, a Viper isn't as showy as a Lambo, it doesn't stun like a Zonda and it doesn't have the Ferrari magic that makes it special. The reason the Viper is only popular in America because the rest of the world are not really interested in a car like this. Don't mistake me for hating this car though, I love it, because it's vulgar, wild,insane and it got a great big engine, but I just wouldn't recommend others to buy one. The Viper isn't a car that you buy because it's good or bad, it's a car that you buy because you love it, and who could explain love?
January 6, 2009 7:25 am
 radmeister radmeister
22mpg? at what 90km/h in 6th gear with cruise control on, my friend has a SRT-10 viper and it got 2mpg on the race track. In the city not driving like a grandma he gets 6-7mpg. This car is in no way as fuel efficient as they say, you can see the fuel gauge go down when you go full open throttle up a hill. This car is another testament of how lame american car manufacturers are, this is the child of a time when Chrysler owned Lamborghini, and THIS is all they came out with??? Compare this with the R8 and you can see what a real car company can do with Lamborghini, not this peasant carriage with a tractor engine. And who's smart idea was it to not put a clear plastic cover over the intakes, i mean how retarded can you be? I guess in the US there is no such phenomenon as rain.....
January 6, 2009 1:19 pm
 radmeister radmeister
You're not comparing apples to apples. The R8 and the Viper are two different animals. The Viper is a wooly mammoth approaching exinction. 2010 is supposed to be it's last year of production. However, it's a vehicle that appeals to a particular niche. It's dangerous, vulgar and loud. There's nothing P.C. about it. That's why I like it. However, I also like the R8. Pictures don't do it justice, and unfortunately I turned down an opportunity to test-drive one a few months ago. I even appreciate the Nissan GT-R for what it is. Of course the GEN IV Vipers are only getting 22mpg in sixth gear. The only reason I mentioned gas mileage was the Viper's innovative cam-in-cam, variable-valve system. This system was developed by McLaren in the US and it's the first of its kind in any vehicle. Wow! New technology in a Viper. Does your friend own a GEN IV Viper? Also, it's interesting you mention Lamborghini. I read an account in which Lamborghini's test driver stated if it wasn't for Chrysler they wouldn't have survived. At that time Chrysler was run by Lee Iacoca. A real car guy. If it wasn't for Chrysler classic designs like the Diablo wouldn't have seen the light of day. Also, I find it amusing you mentioned tractors and Lamborghini in the same statement. I'm sure you understand what I mean. Also, the "Big Three", especially Chrysler, have made some bad cars. However, it's easy to pile on when times are hard. Perception is as hard to shake as bad quality. I have relatives who will not buy an American car to save their own jobs. It's been proven the quality of US cars has improved. Unfortunately, it's the perception of poor quality that cannot be shaken. Finally, the Viper Diamondback is a concept car. It wasn't intended to be a daily driver, and that's why the throttle bodies are not covered. They took some creative license when designing the car.
January 6, 2009 2:07 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
He's got an 07, also has the SRT-10 ram truck, i've driven both and to tell you the truth i wasn't that impressed with the viper, sure it has good pick up off the line, and if u have a sharp turn and 2 available lanes its fun but thats all it has. I had more fun in a 250cc shifter go-kart than in the viper, same ride, pretty much same interior. I won't even talk about the Ram...what a waste of $$. If my life depended on me choosing an American sports car it would be hands down the vette. If i could choose any sports car for the same amount of $ as a new viper i would get a 1 year old 911 Turbo.
January 7, 2009 4:23 pm
some of you guys need to open your eyes, yes its a 8.3L pushrod v10, that does not mean it cant rev, the old Kent engine designed in the 70's is a pushrod engine and on the racetrack is known to be able to hit 10-11,000 RPM. and was american as well, top fuel engines are still based on the old pushrod 2 valve per cylinder Hemi and push 1000hp per litre so i dont even think the european engines have it sused, also after you guys have gone through a few engines you will appreciate getting 500hp at 3500RPM as opposed to 600hp at 7000RPM HA HA
January 7, 2009 3:10 pm
You must have meant '06. There wasn't an '07 Viper. Chrysler shut down the Connor Ave plant to retool for the '08 (GEN IV) Viper. Also, I too was not impressed with the SRT-10 Ram. My brother was a sales manager at Chrysler so I got to drive a few of their cars. I thought it was cool, but a waste of a good engine. It just wasn't my thing. Plus, with all its torque it was dangerous without something in the bead. Of course a shifter kart would be more fun, but there's no stereo, NAV system...roof etc. Plus, it would get cold during the winter. The GEN IV Vipers have reconfigured suspensions so they are much more hospitable on the road and track.
January 7, 2009 4:40 pm