Chrysler Thank You Ads Make America Cringe with Anger

Chrysler Thank You America ad

By Thami Masemola
December 31, 2008 7:14 am
Filed Under: American, Chrysler, Corporate/Financial, Industry

Chrysler's gesture of goodwill appears to have backfired on the US carmaker. For about a week Chrysler took out advertisements in some of America's highest circulating newspapers, thanking Americans for their ‘investment' in the company through the US government's multi-billion-dollar bailout plan.

"On behalf of the 1 million people who depend on Chrysler for their livelihoods, thank you for investing in Chrysler, and America," says the statement, signed by CEO Bob Nardelli on behalf of Chrysler.

Ads were taken out in newspapers like USA Today and The Wall Street Journal where prices for placement of a full-page ad can range between USD $206,000 - $264,000 and $112,000 and $217,000 respectively. Unfortunately a backlash has ensued.

"It's quite ridiculous to be spending that kind of money," says Princella Smith, national spokeswoman for American Solutions, an organisation headed by former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich. "Those ads are just a precise example of the fact that they do not get it ... and it's just in our faces."

Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist told FOXNews.com that the company should return all that money. He said: "Years ago there was a robber who was really polite. He said please and thank you while he was robbing people. At the end of the day, people had their money stolen. Saying thank you doesn't make it OK. They should give the money back."

Some reactions on Chrysler's blog: click here

Source: foxnews.com via autoblog.com

Comments (page 1 of 2)

NISMO
December 31, 2008 12:31 pm
"We're sorry" was probably more in order.

FOXHOUND
December 31, 2008 12:35 pm
maybe they should have taken out a tiny classified ad instead lol.

Motor_Yakuza
December 31, 2008 12:46 pm
Hmmm, not to smart, but it's a nice thing to do.

xLumino
December 31, 2008 1:09 pm
Jeep whould call it "Patriot" I whould call it "bring wood in the forrest"

RS5
December 31, 2008 1:20 pm
I don't understand why this gesture of kindness would make people mad. Just shows how shallow some Americans tend to be.

carcrazy1234
December 31, 2008 1:57 pm
are you serious... here i'll explain it to you. its stupid because that bailout money was given to bring the company back to life by producing efficient models rather than gas guzzling behemoths (did i spell that right?? w/e)... ok. and it WASN'T given to spend on pointless ad's and stuff, that stuff should come later when they actually have money on their own. Also, considering those ad's "range between USD $206,000 - $264,000 and $112,000 and $217,000 respectively.", it's quite stupid. They could spend that kind of money elsewhere and put it to good use.

Bremen_Koenigsegg
December 31, 2008 6:51 pm
I think he was serious, and I agree with him. Thanking the American people for a bailout the majority of them did not want is a good gesture. What is the point of advertising? Ultimately, the goal is to sell a product. Chrysler wants to advertise the fact they are not going about business as usual, sustained as they are by this government bailout -- they want to tell the people how important that money is to them. It doesn't surprise me in the least this story was covered exclusively by Fox News. This is so typical of the ridiculous, ill-conceived fallacies that pass as "news" on that network. What is $500k to a company like Chrysler? A failed model launch could cost ten times that much (a blatantly made up statistic, but plausible) or the difference between an ineffective advertising campaign and a successful one. I do no believe Chrysler overstepped their rights in this case. I also believe people should simply stop watching Fox News for any reason other than mocking how ridiculous that network is.

RobERob
December 31, 2008 7:35 pm
@ Bremen_Koenigsegg Thank you!

I was just about to jump on the angry bandwagon until I read your post. I stand corrected, or at least somewhere in between.

carcrazy1234
December 31, 2008 9:51 pm
hahaha wow. ok there dude. "that stuff should come later when they actually have money on their own"... key point here is, that the money given to them wasn't THEIR money, more like the taxpayers, and governments money. This money was given to bring the company back to life. I'm not saying that this ad is a BAD idea... all i'm saying is that they should put their company ahead, which in the long run helps the economy, and people in the economy. and u said... what's 500,000 dollars to a company like chrysler??? its really like gold for them cuz their on the verge of bankruptcy hahaha wow. yea that's a small amount for "them" considering how large the company is, but seriously, that money can be put to better use. Strange how people think on here.

Ajamin24
January 2, 2009 2:58 pm
A list of other Advertising outlets that could have costed less then an "Thank you Ad in the WSJ": 1: Internet - Thank You Ad on Yahoo and Google. More people go to these sites then read the WSJ. 2: Press Conference Thanking the American people - Low overhead, the PRESS and other Media outlets will print the story in more Newspapers including the WSJ and NY Times. 3: Live American Tribute at the NAIAS in Detroit at the meet the press opener - Again low overhead, they are already planning on attending the event. 4: Added 10sec Thank you on existing TV ads....

All in all, I am more upset that they released this add in Print; in the WSJ and New York Times... Most Americans do not read these 2 media outlets. They should have tried to increase their saturation to the American people.

hata0101
December 31, 2008 2:09 pm
wow...who's shallow? don't thank me, Chryster, i wasn't for the bailout, i believe bankrupt is the correct way to go thou... this is classic, stupid decision by stupid company. the money they spent on this stupid ads could do lots more in productivity & efficiency.

Joe_Limon
December 31, 2008 2:26 pm
could be worse... the money could be going just to the unions... hahaha

Iconic
December 31, 2008 4:09 pm
I just love how the unions are the scape goat in this mess.

Joe_Limon
December 31, 2008 10:52 pm
why? do you beleive that it's the salaries of the employers? is that $1 a year to much? maybe they should cut it down to 50cents. Or wait, could it be the reliable, cheap, nice looking, fuel efficient cars that they make? hmm no that couldn't be it either.

howe2002
December 31, 2008 3:00 pm
It was done to build back brand loyalty. No harm done, but what people don't realize is that the money is owed back to the Federal Reserve Corporation who prints the money. The same group of guys who own the papers and mass media funnel that money right back into their own pockets. Unfortunately it's the public tax payer who always ends up with the bill anyway, designed to keep us all in a circle of debt. The bailout money will not help. Millions of auto workers will be slaves to the government that will own them.

Bremen_Koenigsegg
December 31, 2008 6:32 pm
Does all your understanding of the capitalist economic system come from internet viral videos? Economics does not work like that, no matter how much conspiracy theorists would like it to.

ck314
January 1, 2009 4:17 pm
When someone calls facts "conspiracy theories" you know which side they're on. You are actually saying the Federal Reserve isn't a private corporation owned by a pack of criminal crooks that in turn own the government, or that the latest three economic cracks weren't engineered by those same subjects? Unnecessary complexity is what allows white collar gangsters to get away with crime.

mmr66
December 31, 2008 5:22 pm
i can understand why they are angry if i payed tax and then my government went and gave it to an iresponsible car maker i would be furios.

BabyMilo
December 31, 2008 7:42 pm
i agree with the american public, i think it was stupid of chrysler to spend their BAILOUT money on ads it was given to them to make cars and then when they had made some money from their cars they could then put an ad in the newspaper

carcrazy1234
December 31, 2008 9:52 pm
thanks you!!! someone see's the light... quote: "bailout money".... NOT "advertisement money" hahaha YES!

Page 1 of 2

Add Comment

If you would like to comment, please sign in using the form on the left hand side, or create an account.

Your account

username
password