BMW Release Official X5 M Spy Video
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (45)
Is nothing sacred anymore??
"M" used to stand for high-revving engines, RWD, and a manual tranny
Now "M" stands for Marketing
December 23, 2008 2:09 pm
That is a good point because BMW hardly needs any marketing. Their cars have always spoken for themselves,
M or otherwise.
December 23, 2008 3:14 pm
i just CANNNNT WAIT for this beauty to hit the market!!! i'm driving BMW X5 4.8iS 2006 model...which is Way Waaay much better performance and power than the 2008 model!! but when i heard that this beauty is coming to the market i'll just wait for it ... crossing fingers
December 23, 2008 4:11 pm
GRAVE...sorry to say this but i have driven the ML63 AMG... the Merc is not what i expected at all!! the performance is amazing but the driving handling was the worst i have ever experienced!!
December 23, 2008 4:17 pm
what's the point? why not buy a boxster for when you're in the mood for a thrill and spend the change on an X5 3.0d for when you wanna look like a pillock
December 23, 2008 5:07 pm
Right ,or a Camaro and an Infinity FX , this car is pointless, people get so excited by an suv....Yawn
December 24, 2008 12:18 pm
just cuz they decided to make an X5 M makes it the best SUV ever. 2nd best would still be the Porsche Turbo S not a Merc.
December 23, 2008 5:08 pm
LOL... X5 M over a Cayenne Turbo S ??? lololololo...are you nuts?
December 26, 2008 2:51 am
it is interesting (always) how people who praises so much over the BMW are never older than 17yrs and never have money in life!!!! Always
Think about that those who have money for that kind of car doesn`t go to the track in the powerful SUV, and so there is worthless to say that this one handles better than other one...and there goes bad sales of M-cars again :)
Believe me...M powered BMW sales are way under AMG`s and Porsches, because when someone gives 150 000? for a SUV don`t want to drive just BMW...it is too low clas!!!
Have a nice day
(and also I would never give more than 80 000? for a BMW)
for a +100 000? range I want at least Merc or Porsche
...again have a nice day
December 23, 2008 7:05 pm
interesting how you can guess someone's age from about ten words they write on the internet. you must have quite the library, sir, all those books you must have read merely by looking at the cover!
perhaps you should think about this: most people can't just throw 150k at a porsche badge, they will actually test drive each of the competitors first, and if this turns out to be a more enjoyable drive then only a true fool would choose the porsche merely for the badge. and bmw low class? i'm interested to know where you've been for the past few years, bmw and merc are one of the few really even competitors in the luxury levels.
i'll give you amg outsold m, but a roughly (i think) 15% difference in sales is hardly enough to categorically determine that amg makes better cars than m.
if you were paying over 100k you'd only go for a porsche or a merc? well, fair enough, you're entitled to buy a badge instead of a good car.
=)
December 23, 2008 11:40 pm
now all the mums can get their kids to football practise in no time =D
December 23, 2008 7:42 pm
BMW RULE SUCKERS!!!!!! ARE YOU UPSET SWIFTHEAD BECAUSE YOU ARE OLD AND WASHED UP.......... POOR THING LOL.......... AMG CANNOT EVEN COMPARE TO M MODELS HANDLING ETC. DONT GET ME WRONG I LIKE AMG'S AND HAVE OWNED MORE THAN ONE..... THEY ARE MERCEDES WITH A FAST ENGINE, UNDER-MODIFIED SUSPENSION AND CANNOT HANDLE THE HP! I JUST BOUGHT AN M5 AND VERY HAPPY WITH IT!!!! FYI NO NO BMW COSTS 150,000 USD....... NEITHER WILL THE XM5 IF THEY MAKE IT.
December 23, 2008 11:20 pm
Another hog, with with pig snout to boot. For the grace of the new 7, this just looks like a waste of time. On the flip-side at least it gives the design team some bumpers to redesign. LOL!
December 23, 2008 11:39 pm
100% of the times u will see this x5 there will be a woman driving it and kids in the back seat
December 24, 2008 12:03 am
that is at once utterly sexist and very true. still, most tossers who do 120 on a suburban street can't, either
December 24, 2008 8:40 pm
No, it's not sexist really. I think men just tend to push the limits a bit too much when it comes to driving and they f up. More a matter of experience than skill I'd say. And being a dumba5s ofcourse.
December 25, 2008 8:16 pm
i love the rogue front fascia, that is the real deal for the death match version of the car...
December 24, 2008 12:37 am
Still Infiniti FX50 much better. RWD or AWD. Performance better and use less gas and much faster, safer, good looking and cheaper of course Infiniti's quality much better than bmw x5 m
December 24, 2008 1:18 am
There's clearly something wrong with BMW, they keep on making ugly and pointless cars. When will they stop?
December 24, 2008 1:36 am
@Lucifa
ohh yeah...and top of the range BMW is fairly comparable with best mighty Merc???
I don`t think so...BMW M6 is outruned by many AMG`s (55, 63 and 65) and CLK-DTM-AMG and Black Series...and are driven by those who put more than a 300 000? for a car and drives it proudly, now think of that same person in BMW M6...it would be funny and weird for them to drive in such a cheap car!!!
Because BMW is owned even by our poor neigbour...yes an E46 M3....funny than for someone to have the same badge :P
December 24, 2008 5:37 am
"and top of the range BMW is fairly comparable with best mighty Merc???" aha that's gold, mate! =)
the m6 is overrun by the cl or sl with a 65 engine? so a what, 6.0 litre bi-turbo V12 beats a naturally aspirated 5.0 litre V10? wow, i never would have guessed!! and a ferrari enzo will rip a honda accord to bits, mate. try to compare competitors, it makes you appear more knowledgeable. the m6 and sl/cl aren't competitors.. for example, comparing a cl63 against an m6 is also pointless, as the difference in weights makes it an easy mercedes win.
i want to know just how wealthy you are to call an M6 cheap; i've never heard it called so before. a car's price is not necessarily directly linked to how good it is either - think nissan GT-R.
and just for the record, i happen to know billionaire who drives a bmw x5 4.8is and a holden statesman; and it's not funny and wierd at all - he found two cars he likes and bought them. not all of us need half-million euro cars to make our... anatomy appear larger, sir.
calling your neighbour poor shows you are a snobbish fool. if you've ever been in an E46 m3, you'll know they are superb cars, despite being what you call "cheap". and an interesting point on the badge, i could swear a merc A180 carries an identical badge to that of the S65 - it's like a pointy three-armed star in a circle, and i'm damn sure it's identical!! =)
am i alone in thinking this guy doesn't know the first thing about modern cars?
December 24, 2008 6:28 am
He's just an obvious snob that got rich on a lottery or by his wealthy cousins sudden death. Rarely those kind of people have class. Then again, I'm merely guessing.
December 24, 2008 7:24 am
lucifa - i give you that the CL63 and the M6 aren't natural competitors, but i would say that the M6 and the SL63 are. Yes, the Merc is ?20k more expensive but the on paper stats are very similar and (particularly in the lower engine models) buyers are forced to decide between the SL and the 6-Series as Merc offers no other direct rival.
Having said that, I'm a little puzzled by your comment about the weight difference between the M6 and the CL making the CL an easy winner. The CL is heavier, and it won't actually beat the M6 around corners because that isn't part of it's brief as a big 2 door S-Class.
But don't let me let you think that for a second i agree with any of the sentiment that swifthead has made because I don't. On my street there are 3 DB9s, a couple of 911s, some Bentleys and an SLR - alongside C-Classes, Golfs and even a Ford Focus ST. A "good" badge or a high price doesn't necessarily mean a good car.
December 24, 2008 8:09 am
sub39h - sorry that was meant to be clk63, my bad.
i'm not actually that fussed about any of this, i just don't like swifthead coming in and saying all of that cr** which he obviously doesn't have any idea about.
oh and the sl63 being a competitor - the new one is, but it used to be sl55 and sl65 against the m6, so they never really lined up against eachother
btw, respect for your street!!
December 24, 2008 12:36 pm
GUYS GUYS GUYSSS..... Have u guys drove the Mercedes ML63 AMG and Porsche Cayenne Turbo ? in the city- track- off road ?? im comparing these two because they are the rivals of the new BMW X5 M... from my experience in driving these two cars i found that the Mercedes ML is ridiculous and only good for speeding on an open road!! the Porsche Cayenne Turbo got a better grip and handle on track with a lot of loss of comfort ... but when it came to the BMW X5 4.8iS 2006 model ((im not talking about the new one because it loses the potential to compete these two cars)) it has shown great ability to swerve in corners and better grip on track...and not forgetting a better off road performance which we can experience a lot in our desert environment in Saudi Arabia...
Soo what im expecting from the BMW in their new car ((X5 M)) is something that will blow off the minds of the people who are neglecting about the BMW would never rise up to Mercedes or Porsche
December 24, 2008 11:00 am
@swifthead.... it seems like you're not in favor for the BMW cars...and if so why would you even bother opening this page and looking at it ??
December 24, 2008 11:02 am









