BMW Release Official X5 M Spy Video

By Clinton Deacon
December 23, 2008 6:00 PM
Filed Under: BMW, German, Spy Photos

BMW have long denied the M version of its X5 SUV, but these denial days are well and truly over. BMW WebTV has just released this video of an X5 M prototype undergoing product testing. The video features BMW exec Bernd Limmer describing the characteristics all 'M' models must possess. "M means precision, M means true character, that should remain equal in every situation" he explains.

Unfortunately the video stops short of stating the true performance stats many are eager to hear. We can however, speculate that it will be higher than 500HP/373kW since this is roughly the power currently produced by the most potent lot at this level.

The release of this video enhances the possibility the X5 M's unveiling is imminent, and with the Detroit show less than three weeks away, it doesn't take a brain box to work out where it could be.

 

Comments

Mike.F1
December 23, 2008 6:09 PM
Is nothing sacred anymore??

"M" used to stand for high-revving engines, RWD, and a manual tranny

Now "M" stands for Marketing

Iconic
December 23, 2008 7:14 PM
That is a good point because BMW hardly needs any marketing. Their cars have always spoken for themselves, M or otherwise.

GuillaumeS
December 23, 2008 7:33 PM
Couldn't agree more :(

jsiucho
December 24, 2008 6:02 AM
I remember that quote too, guess competition got to tough.

GRAVE
December 23, 2008 8:07 PM
So it's ML63 AMG rival.

Still the ML is better than the X5

Moharb-Saudi
December 23, 2008 8:11 PM
i just CANNNNT WAIT for this beauty to hit the market!!! i'm driving BMW X5 4.8iS 2006 model...which is Way Waaay much better performance and power than the 2008 model!! but when i heard that this beauty is coming to the market i'll just wait for it ... crossing fingers

Moharb-Saudi
December 23, 2008 8:17 PM
GRAVE...sorry to say this but i have driven the ML63 AMG... the Merc is not what i expected at all!! the performance is amazing but the driving handling was the worst i have ever experienced!!

sub39h
December 23, 2008 9:07 PM
what's the point? why not buy a boxster for when you're in the mood for a thrill and spend the change on an X5 3.0d for when you wanna look like a pillock

Motor_Yakuza
December 24, 2008 4:18 PM
Right ,or a Camaro and an Infinity FX , this car is pointless, people get so excited by an suv....Yawn

BavarianMS
December 23, 2008 9:08 PM
just cuz they decided to make an X5 M makes it the best SUV ever. 2nd best would still be the Porsche Turbo S not a Merc.

Audi_lover
December 26, 2008 6:51 AM
LOL... X5 M over a Cayenne Turbo S ??? lololololo...are you nuts?

swifthead
December 23, 2008 11:05 PM
it is interesting (always) how people who praises so much over the BMW are never older than 17yrs and never have money in life!!!! Always

Think about that those who have money for that kind of car doesn`t go to the track in the powerful SUV, and so there is worthless to say that this one handles better than other one...and there goes bad sales of M-cars again :)

Believe me...M powered BMW sales are way under AMG`s and Porsches, because when someone gives 150 000€ for a SUV don`t want to drive just BMW...it is too low clas!!!

Have a nice day

(and also I would never give more than 80 000€ for a BMW) for a +100 000€ range I want at least Merc or Porsche

...again have a nice day

lucifa
December 24, 2008 3:40 AM
interesting how you can guess someone's age from about ten words they write on the internet. you must have quite the library, sir, all those books you must have read merely by looking at the cover!

perhaps you should think about this: most people can't just throw 150k at a porsche badge, they will actually test drive each of the competitors first, and if this turns out to be a more enjoyable drive then only a true fool would choose the porsche merely for the badge. and bmw low class? i'm interested to know where you've been for the past few years, bmw and merc are one of the few really even competitors in the luxury levels.

i'll give you amg outsold m, but a roughly (i think) 15% difference in sales is hardly enough to categorically determine that amg makes better cars than m.

if you were paying over 100k you'd only go for a porsche or a merc? well, fair enough, you're entitled to buy a badge instead of a good car.

=)

Tuner_Mad
December 23, 2008 11:06 PM
Oh no, that big grill ate a white car!

Moko
December 23, 2008 11:27 PM
@swifthead, are you serious? lol

BabyMilo
December 23, 2008 11:42 PM
now all the mums can get their kids to football practise in no time =D

ccrispy
December 24, 2008 3:20 AM
BMW RULE SUCKERS!!!!!! ARE YOU UPSET SWIFTHEAD BECAUSE YOU ARE OLD AND WASHED UP.......... POOR THING LOL.......... AMG CANNOT EVEN COMPARE TO M MODELS HANDLING ETC. DONT GET ME WRONG I LIKE AMG'S AND HAVE OWNED MORE THAN ONE..... THEY ARE MERCEDES WITH A FAST ENGINE, UNDER-MODIFIED SUSPENSION AND CANNOT HANDLE THE HP! I JUST BOUGHT AN M5 AND VERY HAPPY WITH IT!!!! FYI NO NO BMW COSTS 150,000 USD....... NEITHER WILL THE XM5 IF THEY MAKE IT.

Alfafox5
December 24, 2008 3:39 AM
Another hog, with with pig snout to boot. For the grace of the new 7, this just looks like a waste of time. On the flip-side at least it gives the design team some bumpers to redesign. LOL!

motorsport13
December 24, 2008 4:03 AM
100% of the times u will see this x5 there will be a woman driving it and kids in the back seat

lucifa
December 24, 2008 5:35 AM
and that's a problem... why?

mps
December 24, 2008 11:17 AM
Women can't drive.

lucifa
December 25, 2008 12:40 AM
that is at once utterly sexist and very true. still, most tossers who do 120 on a suburban street can't, either

mps
December 26, 2008 12:16 AM
No, it's not sexist really. I think men just tend to push the limits a bit too much when it comes to driving and they f up. More a matter of experience than skill I'd say. And being a dumba5s ofcourse.

muellr
December 24, 2008 4:37 AM
i love the rogue front fascia, that is the real deal for the death match version of the car...

ATTESA45
December 24, 2008 5:18 AM
Still Infiniti FX50 much better. RWD or AWD. Performance better and use less gas and much faster, safer, good looking and cheaper of course Infiniti's quality much better than bmw x5 m

MTC
December 24, 2008 5:36 AM
There's clearly something wrong with BMW, they keep on making ugly and pointless cars. When will they stop?

swifthead
December 24, 2008 9:37 AM
@Lucifa ohh yeah...and top of the range BMW is fairly comparable with best mighty Merc???

I don`t think so...BMW M6 is outruned by many AMG`s (55, 63 and 65) and CLK-DTM-AMG and Black Series...and are driven by those who put more than a 300 000€ for a car and drives it proudly, now think of that same person in BMW M6...it would be funny and weird for them to drive in such a cheap car!!!

Because BMW is owned even by our poor neigbour...yes an E46 M3....funny than for someone to have the same badge :P

lucifa
December 24, 2008 10:28 AM
"and top of the range BMW is fairly comparable with best mighty Merc???" aha that's gold, mate! =)

the m6 is overrun by the cl or sl with a 65 engine? so a what, 6.0 litre bi-turbo V12 beats a naturally aspirated 5.0 litre V10? wow, i never would have guessed!! and a ferrari enzo will rip a honda accord to bits, mate. try to compare competitors, it makes you appear more knowledgeable. the m6 and sl/cl aren't competitors.. for example, comparing a cl63 against an m6 is also pointless, as the difference in weights makes it an easy mercedes win.

i want to know just how wealthy you are to call an M6 cheap; i've never heard it called so before. a car's price is not necessarily directly linked to how good it is either - think nissan GT-R. and just for the record, i happen to know billionaire who drives a bmw x5 4.8is and a holden statesman; and it's not funny and wierd at all - he found two cars he likes and bought them. not all of us need half-million euro cars to make our... anatomy appear larger, sir.

calling your neighbour poor shows you are a snobbish fool. if you've ever been in an E46 m3, you'll know they are superb cars, despite being what you call "cheap". and an interesting point on the badge, i could swear a merc A180 carries an identical badge to that of the S65 - it's like a pointy three-armed star in a circle, and i'm damn sure it's identical!! =)

am i alone in thinking this guy doesn't know the first thing about modern cars?

mps
December 24, 2008 11:24 AM
He's just an obvious snob that got rich on a lottery or by his wealthy cousins sudden death. Rarely those kind of people have class. Then again, I'm merely guessing.

sub39h
December 24, 2008 12:09 PM
lucifa - i give you that the CL63 and the M6 aren't natural competitors, but i would say that the M6 and the SL63 are. Yes, the Merc is £20k more expensive but the on paper stats are very similar and (particularly in the lower engine models) buyers are forced to decide between the SL and the 6-Series as Merc offers no other direct rival.

Having said that, I'm a little puzzled by your comment about the weight difference between the M6 and the CL making the CL an easy winner. The CL is heavier, and it won't actually beat the M6 around corners because that isn't part of it's brief as a big 2 door S-Class.

But don't let me let you think that for a second i agree with any of the sentiment that swifthead has made because I don't. On my street there are 3 DB9s, a couple of 911s, some Bentleys and an SLR - alongside C-Classes, Golfs and even a Ford Focus ST. A "good" badge or a high price doesn't necessarily mean a good car.

lucifa
December 24, 2008 4:36 PM
sub39h - sorry that was meant to be clk63, my bad.

i'm not actually that fussed about any of this, i just don't like swifthead coming in and saying all of that cr** which he obviously doesn't have any idea about.

oh and the sl63 being a competitor - the new one is, but it used to be sl55 and sl65 against the m6, so they never really lined up against eachother

btw, respect for your street!!

Moharb-Saudi
December 24, 2008 3:00 PM
GUYS GUYS GUYSSS..... Have u guys drove the Mercedes ML63 AMG and Porsche Cayenne Turbo ? in the city- track- off road ?? im comparing these two because they are the rivals of the new BMW X5 M... from my experience in driving these two cars i found that the Mercedes ML is ridiculous and only good for speeding on an open road!! the Porsche Cayenne Turbo got a better grip and handle on track with a lot of loss of comfort ... but when it came to the BMW X5 4.8iS 2006 model ((im not talking about the new one because it loses the potential to compete these two cars)) it has shown great ability to swerve in corners and better grip on track...and not forgetting a better off road performance which we can experience a lot in our desert environment in Saudi Arabia...

Soo what im expecting from the BMW in their new car ((X5 M)) is something that will blow off the minds of the people who are neglecting about the BMW would never rise up to Mercedes or Porsche

Moharb-Saudi
December 24, 2008 3:02 PM
@swifthead.... it seems like you're not in favor for the BMW cars...and if so why would you even bother opening this page and looking at it ??

ccrispy
December 24, 2008 6:37 PM
I must say i own an 07' M5 my two friends own 05' E55 04' CL55 and all three cars are pretty much equal in 0-60 time accpet when it comes to handling,performance..... We raced up to 155 mph and overall the M5 out performed the stock AMG's by far.....

Iconic
December 24, 2008 10:28 PM
BMW's are known for their handling prowess and super advanced engine technologies. Kudos to you for owning that beast. M cars will always tear up AMG's on the track.

It's called 'the ultimate driving machine' for a reason.

The only thing awesome about the mercs is that crazy noise they make!

duderino99
December 25, 2008 12:02 AM
I love that new "M" front end of the one on the vid, I think it's Mad Max inspired...

BavarianMS
December 25, 2008 12:59 AM
I remember whatching Top Gear comparing new e92 m3 /c63 amg/ and audi RS 4......Now both cars competing against the Bmw either had 2 more liters in the engine or forced induction....And even giving the advantage to both the audi and the Merc.....and even though merc has like 45 more hp then the Audi they had a 0.4 sec difference and the m3 took both by nearly 6 seconds. Bmw wasnt joking when they said it took them over 600 thousand miles on the ring to tune the M3s suspension to perfection. So every fanboy on here who talks about car build quality/perfection/and inovation think again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaZExdTHHjY

sub39h
December 26, 2008 11:19 AM
none of the 3 cars you've listed have forced induction

miller
December 30, 2008 9:29 PM
Hmm X5M OR Mercedes ML AMG

mercboy123
January 10, 2009 4:17 PM
well well well if it isnt cheap ass bmw. hmm take a look at the m3 sure its a good looking car but also look at the c63 Amg. if you want a cheap plastic interior go for bmw no problem that is why they are cheap. but when someone asks you what do you drive and say mercerdes benz thats a different story. the name holds and it always will. the ml63 amg is alot better than the new x5 m which looks like crap.

BavarianMS
January 20, 2009 11:15 AM
Lol @ bmw bieng plastic ive been around plenty of bmws and i don't seem to remember any plastic....

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links