Approved Auto Bailout Details: $17.4 billion

GM Chrysler logos bailout approved

$13.4 billion now, $4 billion later, and a big problem handed off to the next President

By Zack Newmark
December 19, 2008 5:32 PM
Filed Under: American, Chrysler, Corporate/Financial, General Motors, Industry

President George W. Bush today introduced a $17.4 billion rescue plan aimed at rescuing the American automotive industry. The move is meant to give Chrysler LLC and General Motors the opportunity to continue payroll, continue supplier relations, and dodge bankruptcy.

In a statement, the president indicated that it is his responsibility to, "shield the American people from a harsh economic blow at a vulnerable time."

The bailout is split into two payments of $13.4 billion now with $4 billion available in February, if necessary. All of the money will come from the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), a $700 billion fund set up to assist financial institutions crippled by the ongoing economic crisis.

Included in the package are provisions to allow the government to block any transaction over $100 million, giving the government the ability to block a merger and to prevent the transfer of jobs overseas. A provision limiting executive compensation and barring the use of corporate jets is also written into the terms. The government also receives the right to acquire non-voting stock at a premium price from any company taking a loan.

Although the president acknowledged this as a move he would never make under normal circumstances, Bush said the addition of over a half-million new unemployment cases and a current recession in the U.S. made this a particularly tumultuous time. He previously indicated that he did not believe the economy could stand another major blow at this time.

"If we were to allow the free market to take its course now it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers,” he said. “These are not ordinary circumstances.”

A conservative politician who has never had the support of major labor unions, President Bush said the laborers, management, executives, and all other stakeholders must make the necessary "concessions" to keep the operations running. Chrysler and GM could still file for bankruptcy after March 31 if they are not on the road to recovery.

This squarely places the automotive industry's problems in the hands of President-elect Barack Obama should the quick-fix not take hold. Obama takes office on January 20, and it will be his administration which will decide if Chrysler and GM are viable.

Under terms of the loan agreement, if the next administration does not believe the companies are viable they can call for the immediate repayment of any outstanding Treasury loans. As the government's loans must be taken at a priority above any current debt, calling in the loans would likely force either of the companies into bankruptcy.

Thus, it will be President-elect Obama's duty to convince the public, which is not in favor of an auto industry bailout, that Chrysler and GM will become profitable in the immediate future. However, if his team believes the industry to still be tailspinning, then they will have to deal with the fallout of nearly 2 million lost jobs. Obama had the support of most unions going into the November election, but now he may be faced with convincing those workers to give back gains they have received through contract negotiations.

Bush's bailout is not that much different than the package the Senate refused to pass last week. The White House deal also requires companies to have a "positive net present value" (NPV) by March 31, as well as proof of their return to stability. Chrysler and GM should also write down at least two-thirds of their debt, and unions should accept wage cuts, but the next administration could decide to dismiss those clauses.

NPV is the difference between cash coming in and cash going out, with all figures adjusted for inflation.

Chrysler LLC head Bob Nardelli said, “These requirements will require consideration from all constituents, requiring commitment first in principal, leading to implementation this coming year. Chrysler is committed to meeting these requirements.”

The full terms of the loan can be seen after the jump.

Source: freep.com

Press Release (Click to expand)

White House statement outlining the terms required for General Motors and Chrysler bridge loans as follows:

Purpose: The terms and conditions of the financing provided by the Treasury Department will facilitate restructuring of our domestic auto industry, prevent disorderly bankruptcies during a time of economic difficulty, and protect the taxpayer by ensuring that only financially viable firms receive financing.

Amount: Auto manufacturers will be provided with $13.4 B in short-term financing from the TARP, with an additional $4 B available in February, contingent upon drawing down the second tranche of TARP funds.

Viability Requirement: The firms must use these funds to become financially viable. Taxpayers will not be asked to provide financing for firms that do not become viable. If the firms have not attained viability by March 31, 2009, the loan will be called and all funds returned to the Treasury.

Definition of Viability: A firm will only be deemed viable if it has a positive net present value, taking into account all current and future costs, and can fully repay the government loan.

Binding Terms and Conditions: The binding terms and conditions established by the Treasury will mirror those that were voted favorably by a majority of both Houses of Congress, including:

# Firms must provide warrants for non-voting stock.

# Firms must accept limits on executive compensation and eliminate perks such as corporate jets.

# Debt owed to the government would be senior to other debts, to the extent permitted by law.

# Firms must allow the government to examine their books and records.

# Firms must report and the government has the power to block any large transactions (> $100 M).

# Firms must comply with applicable Federal fuel efficiency and emissions requirements.

# Firms must not issue new dividends while they owe government debt.

Targets: The terms and conditions established by Treasury will include additional targets that were the subject of Congressional negotiations but did not come to a vote, including:

# Reduce debts by 2/3 via a debt for equity exchange.

# Make one-half of VEBA payments in the form of stock.

# Eliminate the jobs bank.

# Work rules that are competitive with transplant auto manufacturers by 12/31/09.

# Wages that are competitive with those of transplant auto manufacturers by 12/31/09.

These terms and conditions would be non-binding in the sense that negotiations can deviate from the quantitative targets above, providing that the firm reports the reasons for these deviations and makes the business case to achieve long-term viability in spite of the deviations.

In addition, the firm will be required to conclude new agreements with its other major stakeholders, including dealers and suppliers, by March 31, 2009.

 

Comments

joelynn
December 19, 2008 5:54 PM
state ownership.... bail it out if the government can have control and profits go back to the country... thats the answer

howe2002
December 21, 2008 2:35 AM
Yeah, that's actually a bad idea. The U.S. Gov't is corupt enough, they shouldn't get control of the auto industry at all. Nothing would ever get done. It would take longer to bring out new models and technology because of lengthy red tape processes. The U.S. is owned by large profit corporations, they can do nothing but ruin it worse than it already is. Check out 'Zeitgeist', it may shed some light on U.S. Gov't policies.

genie
December 19, 2008 6:11 PM
Ford haven't asked for any of the funds, given their current cash position, they can survive at least another 1 - 2 years on their current cash burn rate and so don't need a bailout. However, no doubt they will be pine-ing for the same concessions that the UAW will have to give GM and Chrysler.

dmanero
December 19, 2008 6:37 PM
well it looks like the unions bulling payoff yet again

Nurchus
December 19, 2008 7:26 PM
Bloody bollux on all of it.

Maybe I should make a Yank car company, give in to labor unions, have poor marketing strategy, make horrid cars, and probably I could get money too.

BAH!! Not the America of yesteryears. For shame, America, for shame.

500lbman
December 19, 2008 7:30 PM
Hey Union Employees - Wake up! Your Union Boss is making a living off of your hard earned salary. If you are getting paid a similar wage to the Foreign auto makers employees, but it is costing the company you work for far more than it costs the foreign company, where do you think the money is going??? INTO YOUR UNION BOSS' BANK ACCOUNT! They are not fighting for your future, they are fightinG for THEIR futures.

WAKE UP. GET OUT OF THE 1930'S AND INTO THE MODERN WORKFORCE.

Joe_Limon
December 19, 2008 7:39 PM
I didn't know that european auto employees averaged $73 an hour after bonuses... average includes/included janitors since the unions forced the companies not to farm out those jobs.

gmfan09
December 21, 2008 4:08 AM
Anybody who did not know this was going to happen is either completely naive, completely biased (most who post here fit this category), or just completely ignorant as to how the US Government operates and what kinds of decisions they make. Any person educated about the US government would know that they are not going to just let and entire industry like the auto industry go away.

buozgs00
December 23, 2008 1:21 AM
I have lost my job (twice) at Ford (@ Europe). They say they'll call me back as soon as something comes up, but who knows? :(

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links