Auto Bailout Rejected After Senate Vote
Only Bush can save them now
By Thami Masemola
December 12, 2008 12:15 PM
Filed Under: American, Chrysler, Corporate/Financial, Ford, General Motors, Industry
The US Senate has rejected a compromise deal that would see Detroit's Big Three get $14 billion in bailout money.
GM and Chrysler desperately need bailout funds to make it past the New Year, or at least until President-elect Barack Obama comes into office under the hopes his administration would save them. GM and Chrysler's survival, and to a certain extent Ford's, doesn't just affect the US but the whole world where these companies trade, have factories, dealers, workers and other peripheral suppliers.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said of the collapse in talks: "I dread looking at Wall Street tomorrow. It's not going to be a pleasant sight. This is going to be a very bad Christmas for many people."
The key issue for the bailout failure was the United Auto Workers (UAW) to meet Republican senators demands of benefit rollbacks on par with those of foreign manufacturers' factories by 2009. The UAW said it was willing to do this when the current contracts expire in the late summer of 2011 but not sooner. Another idea, touted by Democrats but rejected by Republicans, involved UAW to agree to accepting company stock in exchange for US$10 billion owed in retiree health care.
Now it looks as though only President George Bush can save the deal by accessing what's left of the $700 billion financial bailout fund, half of which is being made available. Previously Bush did not consider this option, but a White House aide says he is now looking at all the available options.
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell commented: "We simply cannot ask the American taxpayer to subsidize failure... Even if we grant that these companies would fail without taxpayer help, we would still have to ask ourselves whether the proposal before us achieves the goal that everyone claims to embrace -- namely, the long-term viability of ailing car companies -- and, in my view, it does not."
Related Articles
Comments
It is a simple fix. And the Yanks are capable of making wonderful designs as their history has proven, alongside the Challenger, Corvette, and Camaro. That "new" Mustang is just more of the bloody same and boring design. And that effort alone just proves that Ford is not ready to make changes. They love having more of the same. And that is exactly why I believe not one of these Yank automakers deserve a single penny of tax dollars. If they were making beautiful cars or had a future lineup of new and revolutionary, yet beautiful and functional cars, then I would reconsider. But that "new" Mustang proved otherwise from Ford's standpoint.
Let them suffer. Better yet, let the UAW suffer alongside them. Greed is the biggest killer for any company. And Greed is the main enemy here again. If they can bolster their passion for creating wonderful cars, that alone will be a step in the right direction.
Agree with me or disagree. No one can deny the fact that if the Yanks can't get their automakers to produce better products, then they deserve the fate coming to them.
Thats because its a mid-cycle refresh/facelift. Did you know the Mustang and the C6 Corvette were both launched in 2004 for the 2005MY? At least Ford updated the Mustang styling, the C6 Corvette still looks the same as it did 4 years ago.
Similarly, look at Porsche. Still the same design philosophy for over 40 years. They add wonderful cars like the Cayman to their model lineup and do that much better since it still has the same overall design philosophy.
Add Comment
- 2010 BMW F10 5-Series Leaked
- Audi A7 Spied Undisguised
- Race Prepared Fiat 500 by Romeo Ferraris Packs 360hp
- 9ff Speed9 Based on Porsche 997 Turbo Revealed
- New Porsche Boxster Spyder Photos Released
- Hyundai Kia Announces New 2.4 Theta II GDI Engine
- Abt Golf VI GTD Tuning Program Announced
- Opel Corsa Gets Mid-Cycle Refresh Without Facelift
Latest F1 News
Argentine signs conditional USF1 race deal
Nov 21, 09 1:33 PM
Williams sells team share to Toto Wolff
Nov 20, 09 8:30 PM
De la Rosa, Villeneuve, Summerton linked to USF1
Nov 20, 09 8:00 PM
WRC options emerge for Raikkonen
Nov 20, 09 7:30 PM
Sauber waits while FIA considers Toyota penalty
Nov 20, 09 7:00 PM
Still no deal for 2010 British GP - Ecclestone
Nov 20, 09 6:30 PM
Neel Jani to test Force India at Jerez
Nov 20, 09 6:00 PM
Persistent Schu/Merc rumours played down again
Nov 20, 09 5:30 PM
Mercedes GP in no hurry to replace Button
Nov 20, 09 5:00 PM
Button switched for less money and 'new challenge'
Nov 20, 09 4:30 PM














