Official 2010 Mercedes E-Class Photos Leaked

2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan leaked press photos

By Thami Masemola
December 9, 2008 10:15 PM
Filed Under: German, Leaks, Mercedes-Benz

Here it is ladies and gentlemen. No more spy photos and speculation. These are the OFFICIAL pictures of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class, leaked Internet style (thank you www) for the world to enjoy. Mercedes had originally planned on a January 2009 release of the pics but a clever insider has provided them weeks early, a good holiday present for Mercedes enthusiasts and world car fans alike.

The E-Class has grown in size, length and width for more comfort and interior space. Safety has been a paramount consideration of course and we see that in the new impact absorbing bonnet that pops up 5cm to lessen injury to cyclists or pedestrians in a low speed collision. There's also a system that recognises potential collisions and warns through the driver's pedal that it's time to brake .

Existing technologies for Mercedes like Night Vision are to be found, and new ones such as blind spot and lane departure warning. New generation diesels 200 CDI, 220 CDI and 250 CDI give the frugal potential owners plenty of choice while the 300 CDI and 350 BlueTec come into play higher up. We know there are petrol variants too including the formidable E-Class AMG which should touch the 600bhp/ 450kW mark.

A live reveal of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class is happening at the 2009 Geneva International Motor Show along with the E-Class Coupe. The E-Class Cabriolet appears live at Frankfurt later.

 

Source: autoscoops.eu

Comments

Tuner_Mad
December 9, 2008 10:19 PM
Oh this design sucks hard. Bye!

Lutzie
December 14, 2008 2:19 AM
Nearly all the posters here are so full of it. The E-Class is often conservative, it has a broad function, as a basic saloon, as a taxi, and as a luxury car and a powerful sports model. This is a nice evolution and a return to more consistent Mercedes values after about 10 years of the brand being cheapened by the previous general S, C and E classes.

nendor
December 9, 2008 10:23 PM
the front is perfect but the back isn't clear yet

kimbo
December 9, 2008 10:25 PM
instant classic!

ohhh, maybe not this time...

mroctober
December 9, 2008 10:52 PM
how exciting...*yawn*

daviepops
December 10, 2008 1:48 PM
I'm with you 100% ... Zzzzzzzzzz ... wake me up if Mercedes ever present a sedan with some style

Scuderia-Paul
December 9, 2008 10:59 PM
Looks exactly how we expected it to. The front is somewhat appealing but as with most Mercedes I only become interested with the AMG models. I do not like the back of this from the picture but perhaps its the colour. Give me an XF, A6, GS or 5-Series. Particularly the 5-Series render on the main page on this site. Im looking forward to seeing the Coupe version.

AUDINICK
December 9, 2008 11:00 PM
I had the same comment about the new 7-series BMW ; Nice front - Ugly rear / especially the rear lights /

wjaprep
December 9, 2008 11:16 PM
I like it alright, the back is ok... and I find the foglights odd, but other than that I see nothing wrong with it, cant wait for the coupe.

zizo90
December 9, 2008 11:18 PM
i doubt that the picture of the rear is the final design of the car...maybe the front is true but the rear isnt because the rear light is much smaller than this..check the spyshots and ull see what i mean.. this is too big rear light to be real..

BabyMilo
December 9, 2008 11:20 PM
the front is ok, but the rear what went wrong! come on mercedes it looks chinese!

politz
December 9, 2008 11:22 PM
I know I shouldn't, but I really liked it. Looks more expensive and relevant than the current generation... seems to be more aimed to the chauffer-driven executives around the world than to the german cab drivers who have been buying the E-class for years now.

And yes, it looks chunkier and heavier, but if you look for sex appeal on a Merc sedan for an E-class budget, you might try a fully loaded C-class (maybe an AMG) or a base model CLS.

zizo90
December 9, 2008 11:23 PM
even if the rear light looks to big to me but overall the car isnt bad at all but we shall wait for the official photos to judge on the car... i think it wont be bad..the coupe though will look much better in my opinion...

spamme
December 9, 2008 11:26 PM
the rear looks like with an old corolla, damn

machida
December 9, 2008 11:36 PM
I miss the days when MBs were timeless. The overdone styling of this (plunging front bumper trying to emulate everyone else's "big grille" look, needless swage in rear door and fender) will age very quickly.

It's actually a pleasant shape and has nice stance,a low cowl and good proportions. Just all the bling that dampens my affection for it... That and the unfortunate coincidence of inadvertently cloning the Mitsubishi Galant's taillamps.

Capo77
December 9, 2008 11:36 PM
Hahahaha I really laugh at people that like this design. Everyone makes fun of BMW's design but Mercedes is so damn boring! Plus this thing looks like a Hyundai. Crap!

daviepops
December 10, 2008 1:54 PM
Compared with recent Hyundai design this is way behind ... it's more on a par with the likes of Daewoo ... or even worse, a cheap Chinese version of a Daewoo ... OMG :(

TSLi
December 10, 2008 12:15 AM
I think they've inadvertently made it look more premium than the S-Class. Never have I seen a gradual design change with the E-Class. They're always using the E-Class to pioneer Merc's new design philosophy. This is why every E looks dated after about 3 years. I see the same outcome for this model.

Overstyled to the point it looks like a Cadillac.

afterace2
December 10, 2008 1:20 AM
it's actually the other way round, they first pioneer the design language with S, then they make a similar but much smaller C and after this goes the E. W140+W201+W210, W220+W202+W211, and now W221+W203+W212.

TSLi
December 10, 2008 2:00 AM
Hmmm, if you look at the latest Merc concept shown in that MyComand vid. That is the new design. The more sharply cut headlamps and front spoiler is mimicked in this design.

The first break away from the 'rectangle lights' mercedes' came with the E Class W210 (1995). Then the S class W220 (1999), then the C class W203 (2000) Same with the current models. First the E class 2003, S Class 2006, C Class 2007. Depends what you think of as a radical change in design.

ck314
December 10, 2008 8:13 PM
Wrong. First MB with plastic bumpers? S-class (W126); first new wave design in the 80s? 190.

H34DL1N3R
December 10, 2008 12:16 AM
"These are the OFFICIAL pictures of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class..." 2009!?!? it's going to be presented march 2009!

machida
December 10, 2008 4:23 AM
In the US you can call a car a 2010 model year as long as its retail release date comes on or after January 2, 2009. You just can't have more than two Jan 1's in a model year.

There are various regulatory and marketing reasons to go with one year versus the next (meeting CAFE standards, certain safety regulations, how long a model year you want to have, and the effect on residual value, to name a few). Considering there have been 2009 models on the US market since summer of '08, March of '09 would be pretty late to introduce an '09 model. (But I think Honda is doing just that with the Insight, presumably mostly for the CAFE credits.)

Audi_fan
December 10, 2008 12:23 AM
this will be the first time in my entire life (16 years) that i'll say that a bimmer looks better than a merc...although i don't really like the 5 series i find it better looking than this .. i'm very happy that my father bought the current generation E-class instead of this! that would be a good excuse not to buy the merc and go for the A6 instead... anyway i don't like it,you can do better than that mercedes-benz

cemi
December 10, 2008 12:26 AM
Ugly, boring and forgettable

Uptohere
December 10, 2008 12:55 AM
I think this car will have much more presence than the current model, but the back-end really does look chinese. M-B certainly weren't going for a sporting look with this design. Very diplomatic looking.

nendor
December 10, 2008 12:55 AM
i said the same thing when i saw the S class pictures, but when i saw it with my own eyes i totally changed my mind, because it looks different from the back in real life

Indykat
December 10, 2008 1:09 AM
Well now that Mercedez has built a car for all the senior citizens, what Lexus going to do?

kevoluetion
December 10, 2008 2:12 AM
Is it me or the car looks very japanese? I see they are bringing in LED lights hmm...

stillthewhizz
December 10, 2008 3:10 AM
Looks like a Korean knock-off with shades of Maybach. Not an ideal combo but I'm sure it looks better in certain colours/spec. I'll wait until I see it in the flesh.

RS5
December 10, 2008 3:16 AM
LED DRLS...copying Audi.

Otherwise, the problem with this car is that it looks way too classy, I'd say much more than an S-Class. The design seems to rival that of a Maybach in terms of elegance. The S-Class seems to be in danger of having stolen sales.

afterace2
December 10, 2008 12:08 PM
the S-class will recieve a facelift soon, so stand by for it

ck314
December 10, 2008 8:20 PM
How are they copying Audi for mounting LED's as standard? That's like saying Audi's copying Mercedes for equipping seatbelts.

RS5
December 10, 2008 9:44 PM
Because Audi was the first car company that equipped its cars with LED DRLs as standard equipment on its S6 a couple of years ago. LEDs are like an accessory, not a safety necessity like seatbelts. Up to this point, LED DRL's have been unique as a trademark mostly to Audi and I would've preferred to have kept it that way. I guess it's sort of how Mercedes had the rearview mirror mounted signal lights, but now every other manufacturer has that. Think about it.

ck314
December 10, 2008 10:16 PM
You make no sense, LED's are not a trend or an Audi copyright, it's the logical evolution and replacement of bulbs and halogen lamps since they are more powerful and last a lot more. Aston Martin has been using them for a cpl of years now, and in the near future practically all cars will equip them as standard.

ck314
December 10, 2008 10:25 PM
And BTW, MB was mounting rear LED's (W220 S-class) way before Audi did.

RS5
December 11, 2008 12:49 AM
Can you not read? 'Copying' implies that someone, in this case, Audi, did something first and someone else (Mercedes), taking the original as an example did it again after the original. Technically, it could be said that all the other companies copied Mercedes for its seatbelts. But Audi has been at the forefront of the use of LEDs in automobiles. Read the FULL article:

http://www.worldcarfans.com/2070813.004/audi-pioneers-all-led-headlamp-with-r8-model

LED taillamps were increasingly used in automobiles because they took milliseconds less than conventional bulbs to light, and were much brighter. LED DRLs seem to be more of a design element, like BMW's 'Corona' rings. Whether LED DRLs are the 'logical evolution' that's a matter of opinion, not something for you to decide.

Andres2007
December 11, 2008 2:30 AM
I'm with ck314. You say copy as if it were a bad, illegal thing. Get a clue, if adopting technologies that were developed by other manufactures were called copying, the whole automotive industry has copied everything Mercedes has pioneered.

ck314
December 11, 2008 5:51 PM
You are now mixing everything up to get away with your erroneous theory. It's true Audi was the first to come up with low and high beam LED's in a production car, but LED daytime running lights were standard on the AM Vantage V8 from 2004-2005. And it is an inevitable choice in the future since it has too many advangages over conventional bulbs (aesthetics, both more dramatic design and blueish color matching xenon/LED low & high beam, cost, durability, and so on...) If this weren't the case, why are they appearing in nearly every competent manufacturer's new models?

RS5
December 12, 2008 5:45 AM
I'm not mixing anything up to support whatever erroneous theory you're talking about. If you can't properly understand my comments and what 'copying' means in context, I'm not going to make it my problem. I'm done bitching with you for now.

Mike.F1
December 10, 2008 3:58 AM
A step backwards IMO... like all current MB's over their predecessors

car-o-bar
December 10, 2008 4:08 AM
Front is kind of OKAY (read boring), but the moment I see the back, the first word that came out was UGLY, and then Japanese (Yawn). Both are not good for MB. New BMW 5 series will eat it alive.

Pentium
December 10, 2008 4:12 AM
I will wait to see high res photos before I say anything, but I think it's something good..

hofmeyer
December 10, 2008 7:22 AM
did mercedes hire someone from cadillac's art and science dept?

reyngel
December 10, 2008 9:21 AM
Coming from a long, long time E-Class fan and supporter,

...wow did they ever screw up the design. It looks terrible.

catchmyshadow
December 10, 2008 9:52 AM
i think we all wil get used to it, but it does look old , which means it looks like most of the e-class buyers, cause most of them are grandpas.

wisp
December 10, 2008 9:53 AM
Polo rear lights.

omardarwish55
December 10, 2008 9:56 AM
I believe The current E class looks better than the current 5 series. The previous 5 series looked better than the previous ugly E class .... so I think it's BMW's turn now to have the better next gen. 5 series :) I know this doesnt make much sense but i strongly think it's true .... it keeps going around between the E class and 5 series .

arqlavidalie
December 10, 2008 9:56 AM
I'm very sorry ! Mercedes has always designed maintaining their own identity , their cars have always looked as a Mercedes-Benz ! but now , it's obvious that there's a new design chief , cause he absolutely no idea of what design rules are !!! The back looks like taken from a VW Pheaton , and the front lights from a Cadillac , and the total height of the car is way way way to tall ! , not to mention the height of the hood is like a mile above the wheel arch line on the fenders , and if like that wasn't enough ! , the "fall" of the line of the back windows is more vertical than the one of the front windows ( A pillar ) !?!?, this is something that should never be !!! , they are making the same mistake Jaguar made with the new XJ , except that at least it has 0k looking front and back !!! ( not as good as the previous one , but 0k ! ). Mercedes ! you should do better ! way better !!! I've alway loved Mercedes-Benz , and the E class , but now... it's been killed... I sure now BMW most be very happy !!!

giga_games
December 10, 2008 10:40 AM
I'm also sure, the coupe will look much better/perfect! can't wait...

giga_games
December 10, 2008 10:57 AM
I think there's something wrong with the rear lights cos' there it some kind different than in the spy photos! In the spy photos looks more agressive(sport car) and here too chinese!

MTC
December 10, 2008 10:57 AM
Are Germans running out of ideas when designing new cars?

928GTS
December 10, 2008 11:24 AM
Exciting and thrilling design! Why don´t use asian design aspects. These are the growing markets!

PotatoEater
December 10, 2008 11:29 AM
rear looks like the hyundai sonata. this is terrible.

AmazingJerry
December 10, 2008 11:40 AM
Considering the target market for the E, Merc did a fantastic job. From an enthusiasts perpspective which is every person who made a comment above, its boring and mainstream. And that's a good thing. But here is the money shot - its still has class. The hippie and baby boomer generations are going to eat this thing up. Well done MB!

JackJack
December 10, 2008 12:29 PM
It always amazes me how official photos always manage to "leak" out of from a manufacturer a few weeks before the official planned launch. And how are they leaked?? Amazing!! Secondly, it's very difficult to judge a car from these small photos and not in the flesh. Let's wait and see when the car arrives how people are gonna react. I for one am looking forward to the new E-class

ShinyG
December 10, 2008 12:45 PM
Of course this will always be the E-Class and the target audience will always buy it, as it makes them look classy and rich! Unfortunately, this has nothing to do with the fact that this car looks like poo compared to the current generation E-Class...

Blackeyes21
December 10, 2008 2:30 PM
This car looks like Toyota Camry.

JT29
December 10, 2008 2:42 PM
Merc is a Merc, I guess but this is a case of over design. well everyone taste is different

U.D
December 10, 2008 6:30 PM
it looks like 1990s design not 2010 from the back but the front is mean and agressive well its still a merc

alessandro
December 10, 2008 6:42 PM
I confused by my own mixed emotions on this car. The E-class is always have been a taxi, a luxury cab for me, not a car to drive, not for show up. Since last model it is not so bad anymore but still look old from any angle exept interior. That relevation feels same.

vin
December 10, 2008 6:54 PM
Front looks like a Lexus GS, the rear looks like a Hyundai Sonata. I hope this is not the start of a disturbing trend of the Germans copying the Japanese and the Koreans.

nendor
December 10, 2008 7:05 PM
JT29 what you said is very true :P

Schizo0223
December 10, 2008 7:11 PM
Our family (starting with my parents) have owned the last 4 generations of the E-Class...and we were so looking forward to this new one. Well...all I can say is..."Huh?" Horror of all horrors! It looks so Camry-like! The rear end looks like it belongs to a Japanese car from the late 90's! I hope the version with the sports-pack looks better than this.

ck314
December 10, 2008 8:36 PM
Looks pretty neat, the kind of design you expect for an E-class, except maybe those weird overdone rear wheel arches, but we'll get used to it over time I guess. Inner design should be cozy and practical. As other ppl said, if you want a sportier or more stylish 4-door approach get a C or CLS.

Penner
December 10, 2008 9:29 PM
I can understand all the criticism, it is absolutely true that it looks like a GS, and somehow strange at the back, but all I can say is that after all, I like it!

Wickedated
December 10, 2008 9:40 PM
it's an 85k Hyundai Sonata

danteskov
December 10, 2008 9:57 PM
Well, I was expecting more from this E-Class, I kind a like the current E-class more than this one. This one looks more like the S-Class

burana800
December 10, 2008 10:00 PM
I agree with all of you guys. Its ugly. Its good looking. Rear is horrible and nice. Front end is nice. I like what merc did. They didnt try to make something cool. Ooor something what is good looking for 5 years. And i think this is Merc going back in time. Thats good. e class is a very traditional mercedes. If you need a good looking merc, take a look at cls and cl. And propably the new E class coupe. Not the prettiest car by any means but thats not what he e class is all about. C class was clearly for the younger buyers whereas this is for the elderies.. But hey, this just me. Dont mind me Im just a curious little rhino.

Moviestar
December 10, 2008 11:45 PM
hahahahaha.......... what a copy!! rip of the lexus GS, if your gona copy at least do a better job!!!

Andres2007
December 11, 2008 2:31 AM
Yeeeeahhh, like Lexux never copies Mercedes.

kevoluetion
December 12, 2008 1:43 AM
I think they did it just to piss lexus off

ve
December 11, 2008 12:12 AM
How sad ! Perhaps M/B's previous Chrysler association has drained them of designers ! A strange amalgam of shapes. Very Asian looking. Could do better.

GRAVE
December 11, 2008 2:47 PM
man, the current model is nicer.

kumbze
December 12, 2008 6:33 AM
makes me wanna puke

boyke69
December 12, 2008 12:32 PM
Okay, so the sedan version doesn't look that appealing, but maybe the estate will look good. Or the coupe. Just wait and see it in person, I also thought the same about the S-Class but now I am a happy owner of one.

deano
January 25, 2009 5:13 AM
me too wanna puke. damn

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links