Congress puts forth bailout plan with strict demands

GM Ford Chrysler logo

Congressional leaders are willing to provide 25 billion dollars to the automakers, but not without strings attached

By Alex Ricciuti
November 18, 2008 4:05 PM
Filed Under: American, Chrysler, Corporate/Financial, Ford, General Motors, Industry

GM, Ford, Chrysler and their suppliers are unassuringly counting on a lame-duck Congress and a lame-duck president for help. Republicans in Congress, as well as the Bush administration, remain skeptical of a bailout. And Congressional leaders are aiming to impose serious conditions on any loan guarantees provided to the automakers.

There are currently two competing aid packages being put together, one from each chamber of the US Congress. A Senate proposal by Michigan Democratic Senator Carl Levin calls for the automakers to submit detailed restructuring plans and make commitments to building more fuel-efficient vehicles.

But the House version (House of Representatives) stipulates far stricter conditions. The plan, backed by Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi of California, calls for the government to hold veto power over any major business decisions by automaker who receive aid. It also requires the Big 3 to submit a "plan for long-term viability and international competitiveness" by the end of March next year.

And there is more. The government would be first in line amongst the companies' creditors and the US Treasury will take stock in each company worth a minimum of 20 percent of the loans provided.

But still, the Bush administration expressed skepticism at providing any additional aid beyond the 25 billion in loans approved in September for automakers to use for plant re-tooling and investment in future products.

Automakers are seeking an additional 25 billion on top of that to secure their liquidity through 2009. GM, Ford and Chrysler are burning cash at unsustainable rates. GM says it will run out of money by mid-2009 if it does not secure a government bailout.

Democrats would need a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress to override a presidential veto of any bill they pass, which is very unlikely.

 

Source: freep.com

Comments

Wickedated
November 18, 2008 9:03 PM
"Automakers are seeking an additional 25 billion on top of that to secure their liquidity through 2009." And then what happens after 09? Another $25B? I like Pelosis' approach. You want a loan? Sure, we'll come first in line for every payment and will hold veto power over any decisions. Just like any loanshark would.

lucifa
November 19, 2008 1:23 AM
if they used those veto and credit powers properly instead of as a government revenue raising method, we might actually see some good cars come out of detroit

Drag
November 19, 2008 1:55 AM
Nancy pelosis can take a long walk off of a cliff for all i care.. hunt with a c is the only word i can think of to describe her

dbehmoaras
November 19, 2008 4:10 AM
the labor unions are very much to blame for strife in the american automotive industry because they ask for too much and therefore the companies can't spend the money necessary on R&D and many other things, which is the superficial reason for why they are in a trench right now. It's understandable that the labor unions want higher wages, better healthcare...but what they don't realize is that the more they ask for and receive the more money it costs for the corporation, money that could be well spent in keeping with the competition. That is why Toyota, among others, has been doing so much better, because they don't allow themselves to be taken advantage of by the workforce, saving massive amounts of cash. In any case, the big 3 need the bailout, and from now on, the government should be far more lenient on immigration, and allow the union to be replaced by people willing to work at all if they continue to ask for more. There is only so much you can ask for and so much you can give before it starts to impede on the financial well-being of a company, especially in an industry as competitive as the automotive industry. Enough said.

dbehmoaras
November 19, 2008 4:12 AM
and feel free to attack me for my point of view

flyerbry
November 19, 2008 5:35 AM
The sad part is voting all these idiots out of office won't even begin to make up for the world of hurt our economy will be in if the US auto manufacturers go under. Non-US governments have boosted the earnings of their companies for many years while the US government has sat back and allowed jobs to slip away. This happens not only in the auto industry but the steel industry and others as well. The UAW shares a lot of the blame for our non-competitive US auto manufacturers while the bigwigs running the companies are also to blame for giving in to the UAW repeatedly up until last year when the UAW finally figured out it is better to have some jobs than no jobs. Too bad the damage is already done. It's time for the politicians to step up and figure out a workable solution and quit pointing fingers. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were essentially created by the Democratic party and the push to allow anyone to purchase their own home that started when Clinton was running for office (the liberal press always seems to forget about that) gave us a banking system that made it so easy for everyone to get a home loan that some began using adjustable rate mortgages to buy homes that are well beyond their means. All these problems have been perpetuated by a larger evil... Greed. As usual, Bush has his head in the sand. As I said, it's time for the politicians to stop pointing fingers and become part of the solution.

dbehmoaras
November 19, 2008 7:36 AM
i agree with you; i feel that the best way would be for the politicians to pass a bill to open the borders and allow for immigrant labor because it is far cheaper; both the union and the top-dogs are to blame; in the meantime, the big salaries should be reinvested back into the company thereby reducing the necessary bailout money, even if only by a little, and congress should make that a strong point and condition for the bailout among many other things

View Comment Rules

Add Comment

You are modifying your comment

Exisiting User

Username
Password
remember me

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment

Your account

username
password

Other links