Democrats Propose $25B Cut of the $700B Bail Out Package for Big 3

 Democrats Propose $25B Cut of the $700B Bail Out Package for Big 3
GM Ford Chrysler logo

Democratic Congress friendly to plea for aid from automakers, but the Bush administration still giving the cold shoulder

The CEOs of the Detroit 3 (General Motors, Ford and Chrysler), along with United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger, will be going to Washington next week, hat in hand, and plea for a substantial bailout package.

The leading representatives of the American automotive industry will testify before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee chaired by Democratic House member Barney Frank. Their message will be simple -- help us or calamity awaits.

The Big 3 are asking for a bailout package in the form of 25 billion dollars in emergency loans to keep them afloat through next year, which will likely be one of the worst years the US automotive industry has seen since the Depression. All three Detroit automakers are burning through their cash reserves at an alarming rate as sales collapse in the US market. GM is burning about 2.3 billion a month right now. Ford lost 7.7 billion in the 3rd quarter of this year.

The Democratic Congress is warm to the idea of helping the industry. "A collapse of the American automobile industry would be the worst possible thing that could happen at a time when we are already weakened," Frank told Bloomberg TV, as quoted in a story in the Detroit News.

But the Treasury Secretary of the United States, Henry Paulson, has stuck to the Bush administrations position on the matter, which is that the automotive companies are not eligible for the bailout money since that 700 Billion dollar fund has been earmarked for financial institutions only.

The administration has continued to be skeptical of a bailout package for US automakers and it would be very difficult for the Democratic Congress to pass veto-proof legislation to help the automakers.

It was GM CEO Charles Wilson, who said back in 1955 , "What is good for GM is good for America."

It remains to be seen if the political leadership of the country believe that to be true today.

 

Source: detnews.com

Add a Comment

Comments (13)

Subscribe to comments
 Decypha Decypha
I propose GM get that cut... the whole world suffers when America's finances aren't going to well...
November 13, 2008 2:24 pm
 Decypha Decypha
I mean the Big Three
November 13, 2008 2:25 pm
 m555david m555david
bush needs to be impeached now...and let Obama get the presidency ahead of january 20 inauguration. if idiots in his administration don't get the scope of crisis that they had a hand in creating...then i think they need to be prosecuted in full and thrown in jail for this massive crisis they are responsible for...
November 13, 2008 3:00 pm
burn americans burn!!!
November 13, 2008 3:06 pm
 Iconic Iconic
Bush told Obama earlier this week that the only way he would authorize a Detroit bailout was if the Dems supported the free trade agreement with Colombia. Holding the people of this country at ransom to get what he wants is what Bush does best. Let's see if the Dem's have enough balls to give him the finger by getting enough support to over ride a veto.
November 13, 2008 4:16 pm
 Iconic Iconic
here's the link: http://www.democracynow.org/2008/11/12/white_house_denies_attempt_to_link
November 13, 2008 4:18 pm
 coopergt coopergt
How about we give them $$ but a new board of directors @ GM. they have screwed up for sooo long they need fresh blood now
November 13, 2008 4:22 pm
 Iconic Iconic
Kind of like how Obama promised "change", but is bringing in practically everyone from the clinton admin? ya, good luck...
November 13, 2008 4:53 pm
 allroad allroad
Why give money to a company that screwed up??? My tax dollars to a business that is failing because they can't adapt to market demands or prepare for a future?? I think not. Should the government bail out the corner hardware store then too? It's stupid, if you can't run/manage your company because you have dummies making decisions then you deserve to go down. I vote for capitalism...Bush, Obama, who cares. Government shouldn't be bailing out the airlines, automakers and the like...business is business. We are creating a hand out culture the askes to be rescued when we fail. That's crap. Our greed is our own fault and why the economy is in the crapper.
November 13, 2008 6:53 pm
 Iconic Iconic
I agree with you whole handedly. Bad businesses need to be aloud to fail. This proposed bailout would only be delaying the inevitable unless they truly change their ways.. which is highly unlikely. Just look at the banks, they just got 300 billion a few weeks ago and they're just hoarding money. "Change" will never come, business will be business as usual. Democrats and republicans are the same, they are all in bed with eachother... and big business is their daddy.
November 13, 2008 11:30 pm
 m555david m555david
it is simple...bush is an idiote..and it doesn't take a lot of brain to persuade an idiote in something...but obama on the other hand is a genius among geniuses(simply because he was the top of his Harvard law class) and we all know that it takes a genius to get to that school. so in order to persuade obama in something he has to be surrounded by very very smart people, just like him.... i have nothing against him bringing back people from clinton's administration. because this pack of people got things done before...so i have little doubt that they will get things done again...
November 13, 2008 5:16 pm
 m555david m555david
i had to spell idiote like that, otherwise they wouldn't post it...peace
November 13, 2008 5:17 pm
 Iconic Iconic
Carl rove is also a genius among geniuses. Not that I'm saying Obama is anything like him, but intelligent is not necessarily better. The people that were responsible for all the recklessness were thought to be highly intelligent. As far as persuading Obama, the people he is surrounding himself with don't have a very good track record in making the best decisions for this country or the world. I wouldn't have a problem with him having Clinton people around if they were what we need. Do some research about these people and you'll understand. Obama has a chance here to be great, but it wouldn't serve anyone to have a sense of relief.
November 13, 2008 11:40 pm