Spyker D12 Peking to Paris SUV Heading for Production
0-60 mph in 5 seconds
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (36)
Why does it look uglier than 5 months ago!
It looks ugly on the main picture?
why is that?
November 3, 2008 6:28 pm
I think it looks amazing from certain angles and others not so much. Spyker is a showcase of art in stainless steel. Just simply gorgeous workmanship.
November 3, 2008 6:43 pm
Its not fugly as hell it just looks fatter than before i thought that it was sleeker
November 3, 2008 6:45 pm
This is very very very very UGLY, they should remain at sports cars
November 3, 2008 6:53 pm
Ok i agree its ugly and
THEY are nobody because the laviolette looks ugly too
November 3, 2008 7:11 pm
What a fatass. If I was wanted to show the picture of ugliness, I would show that spyker.
November 3, 2008 7:53 pm
Who gives a damn that it doesnt follow the usual lines of your RR Sport or X5.
I would give all that up for the exclusivity of it! Its so different and fresh!
Just look at that INTERIOR!!! Thats what your're gonna be looking at when you drive it, right!?
Good job Spyker!
November 3, 2008 8:11 pm
Probably the ultimate attention getter du jour though you'd have to say, imagine pulling up at a Greenpeace & Habitat for humanity fundraiser in that. You'd certainly be able to make use of the 0-60 time!
November 3, 2008 8:16 pm
Holly crap even Porsche designers are not that lazy! They simply got a regular Spyker and squished it to an SUV.
November 3, 2008 8:32 pm
my respect has just been crushed for this car manufacturer.... **sob** i really liked the spyker roadster :(
this is an abomination to this company and the world. also, it looks like a bubble on wheels...
November 3, 2008 8:40 pm
"Spyker says demand remains high for the ?186,000 D12"
who are they kidding? it looks like a... a... i dont even know!? in fact, i really dont want to know... bloody hell its making me cringe!
November 3, 2008 9:10 pm
What the hell, Spyker! Epic fail.
This is, quite simply, an abomination. It is not just speaking the same design language as the elegant C8, it is also wearing the C8's lingerie and gowns, dressing up and dancing in front of the mirror while alone in its room. It is pathetic! Regulars to WCF know I am strongly anti-SUV, but, more importantly, I'm anti-stupidity... which is what this is.
The interior isn't worth all the acclaim it is about to get, either. There is (quite literally) scaffolding in the middle, and the centre console is done in a similar fashion to the metal-topped counters you would find in my garage, with screws as inconspicuous as a slap in the face. Same goes for the panels covering the sides of the front seats; noticeable fasteners. There is nothing refined about being able to see fasteners. Completely unacceptable.
I love the detail Spyker put into their vehicles. They are exceptional in the automotive world, maybe not necessarily for their craftsmanship, but for the discernible feeling of craftsmanship their vehicles imbue. This fits that ticket, but fails hard, nonetheless.
November 3, 2008 10:22 pm
HAHAHHA I just wanted to see how everybody would react on my comment!
I drive an A5 2.0 TFSI-VALVETRONIC QUATTRO!
And in stock form it really is about 250 BHP!
I changed the whole exhaust system!
I changed the MOTRONIC cpu!
I changed the WHEELS!
NOW I have this:
250 BHP at the wheels: 18 inch magnesium OZ wheels and
digitpower ecu!
November 3, 2008 10:29 pm
THIS car is out of this world !
the torque and horsepower overlap each other!
So you are never left in the HOLE!
November 3, 2008 10:30 pm
AND LAST : I am from BULGARIA!
SO I over tuned the A5 to have JAMEX suspension!
November 3, 2008 10:32 pm









