Mercedes Introduces C 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
More power, improved fuel economy
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (13)
I totally agree on this. Merc is doing good job today with improving fuel efficiency, so does the vw group.
October 23, 2008 4:39 pm
Yes! Waited so long from Mercedes and most others to make something with their gasoline engines.
October 26, 2008 6:30 am
They've been keeping this great little engine to themselves for some time now. They need to drop it in everything that the port-injected 3.5 is in. And, why dont we get the CLS 350 CGI in the states?
October 23, 2008 5:59 pm
im not too sure about the name, CGI BlueEFFICIENCY seems very long and annoying to say... i think mercedes should employ some new name thinkers
October 23, 2008 6:32 pm
I like it, it shows that they are taking steps towards a greener future.
October 23, 2008 11:25 pm
Wasn't done before because was not important to the clients...
October 24, 2008 1:27 am
With regards to the delay in introducing this to the U.S.:
I wonder if M-B was "testing" it in all the other markets before bringing it to the U.S.? It seems that we are last to get all of the goodies due to legal red tape, litigation fears and also quality control concerns. I've observed this several times before over the years. This happened when the euro Benzes had ABS and SRS eons before we did. I'm sure this technology isn't terribly cheap either. Better late than never, I guess.
October 24, 2008 2:52 am
want to be efficient, and still stick to Merc get the C180. Want the best green car get the BMW's 118d - World Green Cra of The year. want performance like the C350, yet green and fuel efficient, yet fun to drive for the young and dynamic, get the BMw123d not this C350 Efficient rubbish
October 24, 2008 8:39 am
Well if you do your research, you will see that there are smaller variants of the CGI engines. The 123 is a smaller car... maybe suggest a 3 series.
January 23, 2009 1:09 am
For those of us not familiar with the European fuel economy figures, I calculated it to be about 28.3 US MPG. Considering that the car's got near 300 HP and weighs as much as it does, that's very impressive. I sincerely hope MB decides to bring this engine over the pond. For comparison, the regular C 350 averages 21 US MPG, weighs 3615 lbs and has 268 HP.
October 26, 2008 11:17 am









